Tan Nam Seng has passed away on 10 Aug 2025

Sialoquent

Stupidman
Loyal
Joined
Aug 20, 2022
Messages
20,917
Points
113
7949a91cccc1fb53d8f179ba8f2539ed.png

In loving memory of

TAN NAM SENG​

passed away on 10 August 2025
Age: 80 passed away peacefully on 10 August 2025, leaving behind loved ones.

Son & Daughter-in-law:
Tan Ban Ban & Regina Ho Rong Ming

Daughters & Sons-in-law:
Shyller Tan Cheng Cheng
Sherry Tan San San & Marcus Ching
Tan Pei Pei
Tan Yingying & Joshua Wan Shu


Grandsons:
Duncan Tan Kai En
Marco Ching Sheng Hang


Granddaughters:
Shyanne Tan Si En
Carmen Tan Jia En


And all relatives & friends.
......
Murder of Spencer Tuppani - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org

On 10 July 2017, 69-year-old Tan Nam Seng (Chinese: 陈南成; pinyin: Chén Nánchéng; born 1948) stabbed his son-in-law, 38-year-old Spencer Sanjay Tuppani Shamlal Tuppani, in broad daylight at Telok Ayer Street, Singapore. Tuppani escaped and Tan gave chase, however Tuppani collapsed along Boon Tat Street and subsequently died from his injuries.
Spencer Tuppani
BornSpencer Sanjay Tuppani Shamlal Tuppani

c. 1979
Singapore
Died10 July 2017 (aged 38)
Boon Tat Street, Singapore
Cause of deathMurdered
NationalitySingaporean
Known forMurder victim
Spouse(s)Felicia Keh Lay Hong (m. 18 February 2000 - d. unknown)
Shyller Tan Cheng Cheng (m. 17 July 2004)
Children3 (with Shyller Tan)
2 (with Joan Yeo)
ParentTham Poh Kwai (mother)
Tan Nam Seng founded a port management services company TNS Shipping in 1974. Over the years, he expanded it into a family-run business with his three daughters working for him. Spencer Tuppani married Tan's eldest daughter, Shyller Tan Cheng Cheng (陈青青 Chén Qīngqīng) in July 2004, and worked for Tan in one of the companies, TNS Ocean Lines. The couple had two daughters and one son between 2007 and 2011. Tuppani had "sold practically everything he owned" to invest in the firm when it was on the brink of bankruptcy during the economic crisis of 2007–2008. The firm reportedly had a turnover of $2 million in 2003 when Tuppani first joined, but by 2014, its turnover had exceeded $100 million.[1][2]
On 10 July 2017 at about 1.20pm, Tuppani was having lunch with three friends at a coffee shop along Telok Ayer Street when he was spotted by Tan who was driving past. Angry that Tuppani had been ignoring and avoiding his attempts to discuss business matters, Tan decided to enter the coffee shop and confront Tuppani. He told Tuppani "you are too much" in Hokkien, pulled out a knife which he had kept in his sling bag, and stabbed him three times in quick succession.[3] One of the stab wounds penetrated his main artery.[4] Tuppani ran towards Boon Tat Street while Tan gave chase, and eventually collapsed in front of a restaurant.
After Tuppani collapsed, Tan calmly put down the knife. He then called his daughter, Shyller Tan, over the phone, saying: "I couldn't sleep at night. I have already stabbed him. Don't cry. I am old already and I am not afraid to go to jail. What is done is done." When employees of the restaurant attempted to help Tuppani, Tan pushed them away, saying: "This is my son-in-law, don't help him, let him die." Tan calmly sat down and remained at the scene until police arrived and arrested him.
Tuppani was taken to Singapore General Hospital, where he was subsequently pronounced dead at 2.13pm.[5]
On 20 August 2020, the trial of Tan began. Tan pleaded guilty to one count of culpable homicide not amounting to murder. According to the prosecution, Tan was suffering from major depressive disorder at the time, which amounted to diminished responsibility. Tan's depression was caused by Tuppani having an affair with another woman, Joan Yeo Gek Lin, as well as worries that Tuppani was cheating him of his family business.
The prosecution asked for 12 years' imprisonment, citing that there should be a deterrent to other people from taking matters into their own hands. The defence asked for 7½ years, as due to Tan's old age, a longer sentence would practically be a life imprisonment.[6]
The company did not perform well between 2012 and 2016. When business improved in 2016, Tuppani suggested selling it to a bigger corporation. Tan, who was contemplating retirement, left the sale to Tuppani. Leading up to the sale, Tuppani persuaded some of the shareholders, including Tan and Shyller Tan, to assign their shares to him to boost his stake in the company, so the buyer of the company would not have control of it, which they agreed. The sale went through, and Tuppani was appointed CEO of the firm in December 2016. However, Tan was unhappy as he received only about S$450,000 from the sale of his shares.
In early 2017, Shyller Tan found out that Tuppani had been having an affair with Joan Yeo and had two children from the affair. They agreed to a divorce, but continued to live in the same household with Tan and frequently quarrelled over issues relating to the divorce. Subsequent events led Tan to believe that Tuppani was planning to cheat him of his business, by divorcing Shyller Tan, after taking control of all the shares.[1]
On 21 September 2020, High Court judge Justice Dedar Singh Gill sentenced Tan to 8½ years' jail, taking into account his major depressive disorder and his fast-deteriorating health. Tan was not caned as he was over 50 years of age. In the three years he spent in custody, Tan has contracted tuberculosis and suffered two heart attacks, requiring a bypass surgery, among other medical issues.[6]
In November 2019, Tuppani's mother, 62-year-old Tham Poh Kwai, sued Tan Nam Seng for damages resulting from the loss of her son. Tham said her loss amounted to $5,050 a month, comprising a monthly allowance of $2,000, rent, utilities and medication.[7]
In 2022, 42-year-old Jason Er Kok Yong (余国荣 Yú Guóróng) and 46-year-old Lawrence Lim Soon Hwa (林顺华 Lín Shùnhuá), two friends of Tuppani, sued the administrators of Tuppani's estate - Shyller Tan, her sister Sherry Tan San San (陈珊珊 Chén Shānshān) and Tuppani's first wife Felicia Keh Lay Hong (郭莉虹 Guō Lìhóng). Er and Lim demanded a share of a $4.6 million Lorong Mambong property that was tenanted to a pub, Wala Wala Cafe Bar, claiming they and Tuppani agreed to each contribute $535,200 in cash towards the purchase of the property. On 29 August 2022, Justice Mavis Chionh dismissed the lawsuit, finding various aspects of Er and Lim's evidence to be "full of gaps", "riddled with inconsistencies" and "highly suspicious".[8][9]
Tan Nam Seng was released from prison since December 2023.[10]
  1. ^ Jump up to: a b "Boon Tat Street death: Man admits to stabbing son-in-law over mistreatment of daughter and business takeover". CNA. Retrieved 4 June 2023.
  2. ^ Lin, Melissa (11 July 2017). "Boon Tat Street stabbing victim a businessman who 'sold everything he owned' to revive dying business". The Straits Times. ISSN 0585-3923. Retrieved 4 June 2023.
  3. ^ "Boon Tat Street death: Man admits to stabbing son-in-law over mistreatment of daughter and business takeover". CNA. Retrieved 4 June 2023.
  4. ^ "Boon Tat Street death: Man admits killing son-in-law who had affair and took over family business". Yahoo News. 20 August 2020. Retrieved 12 December 2023.
  5. ^ Ng, Huiwen (11 July 2017). "Fatal stabbing at Boon Tat Street shocks busy lunchtime crowd". The Straits Times. ISSN 0585-3923. Retrieved 3 August 2023.
  6. ^ Jump up to: a b Lum, Selina (21 September 2020). "Boon Tat Street death: Man jailed 8½ years for killing son-in-law". The Straits Times. ISSN 0585-3923. Retrieved 31 July 2023.
  7. ^ "Stabbing victim Tuppani's mum seeks $500k from killer". The New Paper. 21 October 2021. Retrieved 31 July 2023.
  8. ^ "Boon Tat Street stabbing: Friends of deceased lose lawsuit for a share in $4.6m Holland Village property". AsiaOne. 30 August 2022. Retrieved 31 July 2023.
  9. ^ "[2023] SGHC 58". www.elitigation.sg. Retrieved 3 August 2023.
  10. ^ "Estate of businessman killed by father-in-law loses court tussle for luxury watch". The Straits Times. 14 December 2023.
 
Estate of businessman killed by father-in-law fails in appeal to get back luxury watch
www.straitstimes.com

Published Jul 12, 2024, 03:55 PM
Mr Spencer Tuppani (left) was stabbed by his father-in-law, Mr Tan Nam Seng, on July 10, 2017.
SINGAPORE – The estate of businessman Spencer Tuppani, who was fatally stabbed by his father-in-law in 2017, has failed in an appeal to recover a luxury watch he was wearing when he was killed in Boon Tat Street.

His widow, Ms Shyller Tan Cheng Cheng, together with the two other administrators of his estate, had sued his parents to get them to hand over the Richard Mille watch, or alternatively, a sum of $389,205.13.

The other two administrators are Ms Tan’s sister, Ms Sherry Tan San San, and Mr Tuppani’s first wife, Ms Felicia Keh Lay Hong.

The exact model of the missing watch is disputed.

The blood-stained timepiece was among Mr Tuppani’s belongings collected after his death by his father, Mr Shamlal Tuppani Bisaysar.

Mr Shamlal Tuppani said he left the watch at the Leedon Residence flat where his son lived with his mistress, Ms Joan Yeo.

The estate administrators alleged that Ms Yeo handed the watch to Mr Tuppani’s mother, Madam Tham Poh Kwai. They also alleged that Madam Tham sold the watch and pocketed the proceeds.

But Madam Tham denied ever receiving a watch.

Mr Shamlal Tuppani and Madam Tham – who are divorced – were sued for conversion of the watch.

Ms Yeo, who has two children with Mr Spencer Tuppani, was not sued despite her alleged role.

Conversion is a civil wrongdoing that occurs when an unauthorised person takes the possessions of another person and deals with the goods in a way that interferes with the rights of the possessor.

The administrators had appealed to the High Court after their lawsuit was

dismissed by a district judge in December 2023.



On July 12, High Court Judge Mavis Chionh dismissed the appeal. She upheld the lower court decision that the actions of Mr Shamlal Tuppani and Madam Tham did not amount to conversion.

Mr Spencer Tuppani was stabbed by his father-in-law, Mr Tan Nam Seng, on July 10, 2017.

Mr Tan was upset with Mr Tuppani for the way he had treated Ms Shyller Tan. He also believed his son-in-law had cheated him of his shipping business.

After the 38-year-old

collapsed in Boon Tat Street

, Mr Tan told passers-by not to help his son-in-law. He then waited for the police to arrive.


The following day, Mr Shamlal Tuppani collected his son’s body and was handed a bag containing a wallet, a car key and the watch.

He then went to the apartment that his son shared with Ms Yeo. He left the bag on a table and told her that “these are Spencer’s things”.

He said he forgot about the watch until his son’s first wife, Ms Keh, asked him about it in November 2019.

Mr Shamlal Tuppani then asked Ms Yeo about the watch and was told that Madam Tham had taken it.

He then relayed this information to Ms Keh.

During the trial, Ms Shyller Tan testified about two phone calls where she heard Madam Tham over speakerphone admitting to taking the watch and selling it to someone named “Tony”.

The two calls were said to have taken place in 2020 while Ms Shyller Tan, Ms Yeo and Ms Keh were taking a break from a mediation session.

Ms Tan also sought to rely on WhatsApp messages in which she told her sister that Madam Tham “told everyone on the phone” on the day of the mediation that she sold the watch for $160,000.

Madam Tham insisted that she had never received a watch.

She said it was Ms Yeo who had sold a watch to help her out after Madam Tham expressed concerns about paying rent for a condominium.

Madam Tham said that in late August 2017, a man came to her home and handed her $160,000. She said she had no idea what watch Ms Yeo had sold or how much she had sold it for.

Ms Yeo had made an affidavit stating that the watch had been “passed” to Madam Tham. But she did not take the witness stand during the trial and no reason was given for her absence.

In her judgment, Justice Chionh said Mr Shamlal Tuppani’s act of leaving the watch on the table “simply did not encroach so extensively on the appellants’ rights in respect of the watch as to constitute an act of conversion”.

The judge said the purpose of his act was not to confer on Ms Yeo any property rights over the watch but merely to return the timepiece to his son’s last place of residence.

Justice Chionh also considered the context in which Mr Tuppani had come into possession of the watch.

Mr Shamlal Tuppani had said it fell on him to collect his son’s body and receive his belongings because Ms Tan had “refused to take charge” of the formalities. Ms Tan did not refute this – she said she was in a state of shock at the time.

Justice Chionh stressed that the administrators have the burden of proving that Madam Tham received the watch from Ms Yeo and that she subsequently sold it.

She agreed with the lower court that little weight should be placed on Ms Tan’s testimony regarding the overheard phone calls and the message between Ms Tan and her sister.

“Not only was the evidence brought up belatedly by the appellants, but it was also not corroborated by any evidence from the other participants to the conversations,” said the judge.

Justice Chionh noted that Ms Yeo’s out-of-court statements that the watch had been passed to Madam Tham amounted to hearsay evidence.

In the absence of any testimony from Ms Yeo, there was simply no credible evidence to support the administrators’ case, said the judge.

The administrators were represented by Mr Nichol Yeo, Mr Shamlal Tuppani was represented by Mr Joseph Ignatius, and Madam Tham was represented by Mr David Nayar.

Mr Tan Nam Seng, 76, was sentenced to 8½ years’ jail in September 2020 for a reduced charge of culpable homicide.

The jail term was backdated to his date of arrest and he has been released from prison.
 
Chin chum chum see the family fight big big and si si also lan lan want back the watch chin chin chai chai also $400,000. People die already just peng peng an an let people rest in peace donch kee kee lor lor but tai tai hong hong let matter pass and future generations will huat huat tua tua.
 
where and when the wake ... moi want to go give condolescent and hugs to Shyller Tan Cheng Cheng and Tan Pei Pei .... :inlove:
 
Tan Nam Seng - TNS logistics

However I heard his son in law told his friend that TNS means Tonight No Sex
 
Spencer Sanjay Tuppani Shamlal Tuppani....................what kind of FARK name is that.............no wonder slain by father-in-law............ :biggrin:
 
RIP. He got upset his daughter & his money got cheated by son in law, right? Hope he rest in peace.
 
Back
Top