- Joined
- Feb 20, 2010
- Messages
- 2,818
- Points
- 48
https://tw.news.yahoo.com/國安會急開，前不著村後不著店-060451816.html
國安會急開，前不著村後不著店
美麗島電子報
37 人追蹤
政事觀察站2018年3月31日 下午2:04
作者：林濁水" data-reactid="11">作者：林濁水
檢視相片
（圖片來源：中央社、達志影像）
3月21日總統召集行政院賴清德院長及國安相關首長舉行會議進行討論。
本來過去總統每星期都邀請國安部門首長進行早餐會，對重要情勢交換意見，但是因為近期國際局勢快速變遷，總統府強調，總統指示未來將定期召開國安首長會議，並看狀況適時對外界說明。
台灣國安面臨短期衝擊" data-reactid="34">台灣國安面臨短期衝擊
不到一個月，台灣連續受到兩個重大國安事件的衝擊：
一、2月28日中國國台辦宣布31項《關於促進兩岸經濟文化交流合作的若干措施》。
二、3月22日（台灣時間週五清晨）美國川普總統宣布將依據美國貿易代表署「301條款」，對總值高達600億美元商品課徵懲罰性進口關稅。
中國的對台31項，是北京在經濟民族主義的邏輯下，依據中國製造二○二五計劃的需要推出來吸納台灣高端技術和人才的措施，這措施掀起了台灣社會對中共是惠台還是空台的尖銳爭議，十分焦慮；
川普的懲罰性進口關稅不只是在全球進一步推升貿易戰危機，也因為世界體系中，台灣長期處於半邊陲地位，在製造業上居於產業鏈的中游位置，鑲嵌在中美Chimerica之間，共同形成了Chiwanrica的連結，現在中美貿易戰迅速升溫，如果連結斷裂，台灣受到的衝擊，非同小可，如果處理不好，台灣受到傷害甚至可能比中美雙方更嚴重。
台灣國安面臨長期衝擊" data-reactid="40">台灣國安面臨長期衝擊
就長期來說，這兩個衝擊是中美和兩岸關係長期緊張的進一步惡化，並不是孤立、突發事件，緊張目前看不出緩和的跡象，台灣不能沒有面對緊張持續升級，衝擊長期的打算。
面對不同的「非常態情境」要有兩種不同因應策略" data-reactid="42">面對不同的「非常態情境」要有兩種不同因應策略
長期趨勢和短期衝擊互相交織，一時之間，台灣的國安被推進入了遠比過去嚴峻的「非常態情境」。
面對這樣的「非常態情境」，國安體系比過去進一步緊繃神經，嚴肅面對，那當然應該，這就是3月21日國安會議的基礎。
會議後，總統府新聞稿第一句這樣開頭：「今（21）日上午七點半」—這樣的開頭，看來是要向大家做個開宗明義的提醒：由於情境非常態嚴重，所以這會開得不常規，有緊急性，必須很當一回事地不依常態上班時間召開。
只是當前「非常態情境」雖然嚴峻，但是國安會卻不一定非要非常規地打破正常上班時間召開不可。
如果針對的「非常態情境」是一個長期性的狀態，國家需要一個用來長期因應的戰略，那麼做好充分準備，國安會不應該開得太緊急，反而才可能有最好的討論品質，得到更好的結論，擬定出最恰當的因應戰略；
如果針對明確的突發特定緊急事項，國家的需要是迅速地做危機處理，那麼就必需覺悟，必須在資訊還不夠充分的條件下劍及履及馬上緊急開會緊急處理，沒有太多可以猶豫的時間。
有了這樣的認識，再回頭看這次緊急國安會，就會發現開得似乎蠻無釐頭。
緊急會議不宜開在不緊急的時刻" data-reactid="50">緊急會議不宜開在不緊急的時刻
如果這次會議是要因應中國31項措施或美國宣布對中國課600億懲罰關稅，那麼開緊急會是當然。
只是中國31項措施早在2月28日就宣布了，行院至少在3月2日前就已經成立專案因應小組，並在3月13的跨部會會議完成因應方案，16日公布了，那麼到了一個星期後國安會除非對行政院的方案非常不滿意，否則緊急會議不會召開有那麼一點無釐頭嗎？
如果這次會是為了因應美國川普的貿易懲罰方案，那麼縱然知道方案22日就要公布，但是在具體内容還不明確的21日召開緊急會議，會有什麼犀利的因應態度嗎？
所以21日這個緊急會議開在並不緊急的時刻，和前後兩個突發衝擊事件的關係簡直是前不著村後不著店，蠻無釐頭的。
因應長期戰略不宜匆促開會，大肆宣傳的會議不宜立場策略都留白" data-reactid="55">因應長期戰略不宜匆促開會，大肆宣傳的會議不宜立場策略都留白
假使這次會議召開，為的是長期戰略的需要，那麼忙忙亂亂開緊急會議就更奇怪了。
這一次開完了後被刻意突出的國安會，怪的地方還不只是上面說的而已。
例如，假使是危機處理，那麼會議開完，具體的方案就必須提出，但是這個鄭重其事的會議之後，並沒有什麼麽具體政策；假如開會是為的長期戰略，也同樣沒有什麼戰略結論，甚至連戰略釐定前置條件如核心價值立場的設定、戰略環境的評估都是空白。
這次會議唯一清楚要表示的似乎只有批評習近平的修憲廢除國家主席的任期制，並說台灣相信民主，和北京不同這一件。
問題是，這一件難道是大家都不明白，所以需要鄭重其事地把所有的國安高層都找來開會才能做成可以廣為宣傳的寶貴結論嗎？
也許，總統鄭重其事地召開緊急會議，目的並不在形成立場和對策，而在於展現總統站穩有效掌握國安機器的位置，而達到安頓民眾對總統領導的信心的效果，所以不提出任何因應方向和措施，只大張旗鼓地對外發表的會議過程的細節？
只是這樣一來，一般焦慮而生性現實的民眾看不到具體政策，並不容易安心；而行家又反會看到了國安當局處理國安大事時處處外行，於是效應和總統強化民眾信心的期待適得其反。
畢竟，要讓民眾肯定政府有效地存在的方式並不在向民眾強調，政府多麼鄭重其事地開了什麼樣的高層緊急會議，而是提出明確具體而有效的戰略和政策。
國安竟然是不怎麼強的行政體中最弱的一環" data-reactid="64">國安竟然是不怎麼強的行政體中最弱的一環
事實上，2015年底來，即將上台執政的團隊，國安問題的處理就品質低落，此後縱使秘書長已經換了幾位，但是狀況並沒有改善，像馬習會、南海護漁、飛彈誤射、南海立場、陸戰隊虐狗、馬習會秘使…等等處理起來烏龍層出不窮，如今面對嚴峻的國際、兩岸情勢，國安會又大張旗鼓地開了個烏龍會。
國安體系就居然一直是整個不怎麼強的行政體中最弱的一環了。無論如何，能夠不加油嗎？
The National Security Council is in a hurry to open a shop without a village
Beautiful Island Newsletter
37 people tracking
Political Observatory March 31, 2018 2:04 PM
作者：林濁水 ">Author: Lin Cho-shui "data-reactid =" 11 "> Author: Lin Cho-shui
View photo
(Source: Central News Agency, Dazhi Video)
On March 21st, the President convened the Executive Yuan Lai Qingde Dean and the relevant national security head to hold a meeting for discussion.
In the past, the President invited the head of the national security department to hold a breakfast meeting every week and exchanged opinions on important situations. However, due to the recent rapid changes in the international situation, the presidential office emphasized that the president has indicated that he will hold regular meetings of the National Security Council in the future and that the situation will be properly explained to the outside world.
台灣國安面臨短期衝擊 ">Taiwan Guoan faces short-term impact "data-reactid="34"> Taiwan Guoan faces short-term impact
In less than a month, Taiwan has been continuously hit by two major national security incidents:
1. On February 28th, the State Council's Taiwan Affairs Office announced 31 "Some Measures on Promoting Cross-Strait Economic and Cultural Exchanges and Cooperation."
2. On March 22 (Taiwan time Friday morning), President Trump announced that it will impose punitive import duties on products worth up to US$60 billion according to the US Trade Representative's “Section 301”.
China’s 31 projects with Taiwan are measures that Beijing launched under the logic of economic nationalism to absorb Taiwan’s high-end technologies and talents in accordance with the needs of the China’s manufacturing plan for the 2025 plan. This measure has set off the Taiwan society’s benefits to the Chinese Communist Party. The controversy over the empty platform is very anxious;
Trump’s punitive import tariffs not only push the trade war crisis further in the world, but also because in the world system, Taiwan has long been in a half-edge position, and it is located in the midstream of the industrial chain in the manufacturing industry, and is embedded between Chimerica and China. As a result of the joint formation of Chiwanrica, the trade war between China and the United States is rapidly heating up. If the link breaks down, the impact on Taiwan will be very trivial. If handled badly, Taiwan may even suffer more damage than China and the US.
台灣國安面臨長期衝擊 ">Taiwan Guoan is facing long-term impact "data-reactid="40"> Taiwan Guoan faces long-term impact
In the long run, these two shocks are a further deterioration of the long-term tensions between China and the United States and between the two sides of the strait. They are not isolated and emergencies. Tension does not show signs of easing at present. Taiwan cannot continue to escalate in the face of tension, and it will affect long-term plans. .
面對不同的「非常態情境」要有兩種不同因應策略 ">In the face of different "unconventional situations", there are two different response strategies: "data-reactid="42"> There are two different response strategies to deal with different "exceptional situations".
Long-term trends and short-term shocks are intertwined. Over time, Taiwan’s national security has been pushed into a far more “exceptional situation” than in the past.
In the face of such an “unusual situation,” the national security system has been more tightly and nervously faced than in the past. Of course, this is the basis of the National Security Conference on March 21.
After the meeting, the first sentence of the press release of the presidential office begins with the following statement: “At 7:30 a.m. on (21) today”—this kind of opening seems to be a reminder for everyone to make a clear statement: Because the situation is very serious, it will open. It is not routine, it is urgent, and it must be very much the same as the normal business hours.
It is only that the current "exceptional situation" is severe, but the National Security Council does not necessarily have to break the normal working hours and unconventionally.
If the “unusual situation” targeted is a long-term state, the country needs a strategy for long-term response. If it is to be fully prepared, the National Security Council should not be too urgent, but it may have the best quality of discussion. Get better conclusions and formulate the most appropriate response strategy;
If the country's needs are promptly handled in response to specific emergent emergencies, it must be realized that it is necessary to urgently handle the situation under the condition that the information is still insufficient. time.
With this understanding, looking back at this emergency National Security Council, you will find that it seems to be quite indecisive.
緊急會議不宜開在不緊急的時刻 ">Emergency meetings should not be opened in times of no emergency "data-reactid="50">An emergency meeting should not be held in an emergency
If this meeting is to respond to 31 measures in China or if the United States declares it to impose a penalty of 60 billion in tariffs on China, then it is of course an emergency.
Only 31 measures of China were announced as early as February 28th. The hospital had set up a special case response team at least before March 2 and completed the response plan at the interministerial meeting on March 13. It was announced on the 16th. After a week, unless the National Security Council is very dissatisfied with the Executive Yuan’s plan, is it not a point that the emergency meeting will not be convened?
If this meeting is intended to respond to Trump's trade punishment plan, even if it is known that the plan will be announced on the 22nd, but on the 21st day when the specific contents are not yet clear, will there be any sharp response?
Therefore, the emergency meeting on the 21st was not in an urgent time. The relationship between the two sudden impact incidents before and after was simply not in front of the village and it was not worthwhile.
因應長期戰略不宜匆促開會，大肆宣傳的會議不宜立場策略都留白 ">In response to the long-term strategy, it is not appropriate to hold meetings in a hurry, and it is not appropriate for the publicized conferences to be left blank. “data-reactid="55">It is not appropriate to hold meetings due to long-term strategies.
If this meeting is held in order to meet the needs of a long-term strategy, it is all the more strange that we must rush to open an emergency meeting.
The National Security Council, which was deliberately highlighted after the opening of this time, is not only the above-mentioned place.
For example, if the crisis is dealt with, the specific plan must be put forward after the meeting is completed, but after this solemn meeting, there is no specific policy; if the meeting is a long-term strategy, there is also no strategic conclusion. Even the strategically determined preconditions such as the setting of the core value position and the evaluation of the strategic environment are all blank.
The only thing that this conference clearly indicated was that it seemed to criticize Xi Jinping's amendment to the Constitution and abolish the term system of the chairman of the country, and said that Taiwan believes in democracy and is different from Beijing.
The problem is that this is something that everyone does not understand, so it is important to get all senior national security officials to meet in a meeting to produce valuable conclusions that can be widely publicized.
Perhaps the president solemnly convenes an emergency meeting not for the purpose of forming positions and countermeasures, but for displaying the position of the president in stably and effectively grasping the Guo'an machine and achieving the effect of the confidence of the settlers in the leadership of the president. Therefore, he does not propose any response. And measures, the details of the conference process published only with great fanfare to the outside world?
Only in this way, people with general anxiety and natural reality can't see specific policies and are not easy to feel at ease. Experts will also see that the national security authorities deal with national security issues when they are outsiders. Therefore, the effect and expectations of the president to strengthen people’s confidence are counter-productive.
After all, the way to make sure that the government exists effectively is not to emphasize to the public what kind of high-level emergency meeting the government has opened, but to put forward specific and effective strategies and policies.
國安竟然是不怎麼強的行政體中最弱的一環 ">Guo'an turned out to be the weakest link in the administrative system that is not strong enough. "Data-reactid="64">National Security is actually the weakest link in the administrative system that is not so strong."
In fact, at the end of 2015, the team that was about to come to power and handling the national security issue were of low quality. Since then, even though the Secretary General had already changed several positions, the situation did not improve, like the Ma Xihui, South China Sea fishing, and missed missiles. The position of the South China Sea, the abuse of the dogs by the Marines, the secrets of the Ma Xi Conspirators, and so on have all dealt with the ever-growing oolong. Now facing a grim international and cross-strait situation, the National Security Council has opened a splendid Oolong meeting.
The national security system has always been the weakest link in the overall weak administrative system. Anyway, can you not get it?
國安會急開，前不著村後不著店
美麗島電子報
37 人追蹤
政事觀察站2018年3月31日 下午2:04
作者：林濁水" data-reactid="11">作者：林濁水
檢視相片
（圖片來源：中央社、達志影像）
3月21日總統召集行政院賴清德院長及國安相關首長舉行會議進行討論。
本來過去總統每星期都邀請國安部門首長進行早餐會，對重要情勢交換意見，但是因為近期國際局勢快速變遷，總統府強調，總統指示未來將定期召開國安首長會議，並看狀況適時對外界說明。
台灣國安面臨短期衝擊" data-reactid="34">台灣國安面臨短期衝擊
不到一個月，台灣連續受到兩個重大國安事件的衝擊：
一、2月28日中國國台辦宣布31項《關於促進兩岸經濟文化交流合作的若干措施》。
二、3月22日（台灣時間週五清晨）美國川普總統宣布將依據美國貿易代表署「301條款」，對總值高達600億美元商品課徵懲罰性進口關稅。
中國的對台31項，是北京在經濟民族主義的邏輯下，依據中國製造二○二五計劃的需要推出來吸納台灣高端技術和人才的措施，這措施掀起了台灣社會對中共是惠台還是空台的尖銳爭議，十分焦慮；
川普的懲罰性進口關稅不只是在全球進一步推升貿易戰危機，也因為世界體系中，台灣長期處於半邊陲地位，在製造業上居於產業鏈的中游位置，鑲嵌在中美Chimerica之間，共同形成了Chiwanrica的連結，現在中美貿易戰迅速升溫，如果連結斷裂，台灣受到的衝擊，非同小可，如果處理不好，台灣受到傷害甚至可能比中美雙方更嚴重。
台灣國安面臨長期衝擊" data-reactid="40">台灣國安面臨長期衝擊
就長期來說，這兩個衝擊是中美和兩岸關係長期緊張的進一步惡化，並不是孤立、突發事件，緊張目前看不出緩和的跡象，台灣不能沒有面對緊張持續升級，衝擊長期的打算。
面對不同的「非常態情境」要有兩種不同因應策略" data-reactid="42">面對不同的「非常態情境」要有兩種不同因應策略
長期趨勢和短期衝擊互相交織，一時之間，台灣的國安被推進入了遠比過去嚴峻的「非常態情境」。
面對這樣的「非常態情境」，國安體系比過去進一步緊繃神經，嚴肅面對，那當然應該，這就是3月21日國安會議的基礎。
會議後，總統府新聞稿第一句這樣開頭：「今（21）日上午七點半」—這樣的開頭，看來是要向大家做個開宗明義的提醒：由於情境非常態嚴重，所以這會開得不常規，有緊急性，必須很當一回事地不依常態上班時間召開。
只是當前「非常態情境」雖然嚴峻，但是國安會卻不一定非要非常規地打破正常上班時間召開不可。
如果針對的「非常態情境」是一個長期性的狀態，國家需要一個用來長期因應的戰略，那麼做好充分準備，國安會不應該開得太緊急，反而才可能有最好的討論品質，得到更好的結論，擬定出最恰當的因應戰略；
如果針對明確的突發特定緊急事項，國家的需要是迅速地做危機處理，那麼就必需覺悟，必須在資訊還不夠充分的條件下劍及履及馬上緊急開會緊急處理，沒有太多可以猶豫的時間。
有了這樣的認識，再回頭看這次緊急國安會，就會發現開得似乎蠻無釐頭。
緊急會議不宜開在不緊急的時刻" data-reactid="50">緊急會議不宜開在不緊急的時刻
如果這次會議是要因應中國31項措施或美國宣布對中國課600億懲罰關稅，那麼開緊急會是當然。
只是中國31項措施早在2月28日就宣布了，行院至少在3月2日前就已經成立專案因應小組，並在3月13的跨部會會議完成因應方案，16日公布了，那麼到了一個星期後國安會除非對行政院的方案非常不滿意，否則緊急會議不會召開有那麼一點無釐頭嗎？
如果這次會是為了因應美國川普的貿易懲罰方案，那麼縱然知道方案22日就要公布，但是在具體内容還不明確的21日召開緊急會議，會有什麼犀利的因應態度嗎？
所以21日這個緊急會議開在並不緊急的時刻，和前後兩個突發衝擊事件的關係簡直是前不著村後不著店，蠻無釐頭的。
因應長期戰略不宜匆促開會，大肆宣傳的會議不宜立場策略都留白" data-reactid="55">因應長期戰略不宜匆促開會，大肆宣傳的會議不宜立場策略都留白
假使這次會議召開，為的是長期戰略的需要，那麼忙忙亂亂開緊急會議就更奇怪了。
這一次開完了後被刻意突出的國安會，怪的地方還不只是上面說的而已。
例如，假使是危機處理，那麼會議開完，具體的方案就必須提出，但是這個鄭重其事的會議之後，並沒有什麼麽具體政策；假如開會是為的長期戰略，也同樣沒有什麼戰略結論，甚至連戰略釐定前置條件如核心價值立場的設定、戰略環境的評估都是空白。
這次會議唯一清楚要表示的似乎只有批評習近平的修憲廢除國家主席的任期制，並說台灣相信民主，和北京不同這一件。
問題是，這一件難道是大家都不明白，所以需要鄭重其事地把所有的國安高層都找來開會才能做成可以廣為宣傳的寶貴結論嗎？
也許，總統鄭重其事地召開緊急會議，目的並不在形成立場和對策，而在於展現總統站穩有效掌握國安機器的位置，而達到安頓民眾對總統領導的信心的效果，所以不提出任何因應方向和措施，只大張旗鼓地對外發表的會議過程的細節？
只是這樣一來，一般焦慮而生性現實的民眾看不到具體政策，並不容易安心；而行家又反會看到了國安當局處理國安大事時處處外行，於是效應和總統強化民眾信心的期待適得其反。
畢竟，要讓民眾肯定政府有效地存在的方式並不在向民眾強調，政府多麼鄭重其事地開了什麼樣的高層緊急會議，而是提出明確具體而有效的戰略和政策。
國安竟然是不怎麼強的行政體中最弱的一環" data-reactid="64">國安竟然是不怎麼強的行政體中最弱的一環
事實上，2015年底來，即將上台執政的團隊，國安問題的處理就品質低落，此後縱使秘書長已經換了幾位，但是狀況並沒有改善，像馬習會、南海護漁、飛彈誤射、南海立場、陸戰隊虐狗、馬習會秘使…等等處理起來烏龍層出不窮，如今面對嚴峻的國際、兩岸情勢，國安會又大張旗鼓地開了個烏龍會。
國安體系就居然一直是整個不怎麼強的行政體中最弱的一環了。無論如何，能夠不加油嗎？
The National Security Council is in a hurry to open a shop without a village
Beautiful Island Newsletter
37 people tracking
Political Observatory March 31, 2018 2:04 PM
作者：林濁水 ">Author: Lin Cho-shui "data-reactid =" 11 "> Author: Lin Cho-shui
View photo
(Source: Central News Agency, Dazhi Video)
On March 21st, the President convened the Executive Yuan Lai Qingde Dean and the relevant national security head to hold a meeting for discussion.
In the past, the President invited the head of the national security department to hold a breakfast meeting every week and exchanged opinions on important situations. However, due to the recent rapid changes in the international situation, the presidential office emphasized that the president has indicated that he will hold regular meetings of the National Security Council in the future and that the situation will be properly explained to the outside world.
台灣國安面臨短期衝擊 ">Taiwan Guoan faces short-term impact "data-reactid="34"> Taiwan Guoan faces short-term impact
In less than a month, Taiwan has been continuously hit by two major national security incidents:
1. On February 28th, the State Council's Taiwan Affairs Office announced 31 "Some Measures on Promoting Cross-Strait Economic and Cultural Exchanges and Cooperation."
2. On March 22 (Taiwan time Friday morning), President Trump announced that it will impose punitive import duties on products worth up to US$60 billion according to the US Trade Representative's “Section 301”.
China’s 31 projects with Taiwan are measures that Beijing launched under the logic of economic nationalism to absorb Taiwan’s high-end technologies and talents in accordance with the needs of the China’s manufacturing plan for the 2025 plan. This measure has set off the Taiwan society’s benefits to the Chinese Communist Party. The controversy over the empty platform is very anxious;
Trump’s punitive import tariffs not only push the trade war crisis further in the world, but also because in the world system, Taiwan has long been in a half-edge position, and it is located in the midstream of the industrial chain in the manufacturing industry, and is embedded between Chimerica and China. As a result of the joint formation of Chiwanrica, the trade war between China and the United States is rapidly heating up. If the link breaks down, the impact on Taiwan will be very trivial. If handled badly, Taiwan may even suffer more damage than China and the US.
台灣國安面臨長期衝擊 ">Taiwan Guoan is facing long-term impact "data-reactid="40"> Taiwan Guoan faces long-term impact
In the long run, these two shocks are a further deterioration of the long-term tensions between China and the United States and between the two sides of the strait. They are not isolated and emergencies. Tension does not show signs of easing at present. Taiwan cannot continue to escalate in the face of tension, and it will affect long-term plans. .
面對不同的「非常態情境」要有兩種不同因應策略 ">In the face of different "unconventional situations", there are two different response strategies: "data-reactid="42"> There are two different response strategies to deal with different "exceptional situations".
Long-term trends and short-term shocks are intertwined. Over time, Taiwan’s national security has been pushed into a far more “exceptional situation” than in the past.
In the face of such an “unusual situation,” the national security system has been more tightly and nervously faced than in the past. Of course, this is the basis of the National Security Conference on March 21.
After the meeting, the first sentence of the press release of the presidential office begins with the following statement: “At 7:30 a.m. on (21) today”—this kind of opening seems to be a reminder for everyone to make a clear statement: Because the situation is very serious, it will open. It is not routine, it is urgent, and it must be very much the same as the normal business hours.
It is only that the current "exceptional situation" is severe, but the National Security Council does not necessarily have to break the normal working hours and unconventionally.
If the “unusual situation” targeted is a long-term state, the country needs a strategy for long-term response. If it is to be fully prepared, the National Security Council should not be too urgent, but it may have the best quality of discussion. Get better conclusions and formulate the most appropriate response strategy;
If the country's needs are promptly handled in response to specific emergent emergencies, it must be realized that it is necessary to urgently handle the situation under the condition that the information is still insufficient. time.
With this understanding, looking back at this emergency National Security Council, you will find that it seems to be quite indecisive.
緊急會議不宜開在不緊急的時刻 ">Emergency meetings should not be opened in times of no emergency "data-reactid="50">An emergency meeting should not be held in an emergency
If this meeting is to respond to 31 measures in China or if the United States declares it to impose a penalty of 60 billion in tariffs on China, then it is of course an emergency.
Only 31 measures of China were announced as early as February 28th. The hospital had set up a special case response team at least before March 2 and completed the response plan at the interministerial meeting on March 13. It was announced on the 16th. After a week, unless the National Security Council is very dissatisfied with the Executive Yuan’s plan, is it not a point that the emergency meeting will not be convened?
If this meeting is intended to respond to Trump's trade punishment plan, even if it is known that the plan will be announced on the 22nd, but on the 21st day when the specific contents are not yet clear, will there be any sharp response?
Therefore, the emergency meeting on the 21st was not in an urgent time. The relationship between the two sudden impact incidents before and after was simply not in front of the village and it was not worthwhile.
因應長期戰略不宜匆促開會，大肆宣傳的會議不宜立場策略都留白 ">In response to the long-term strategy, it is not appropriate to hold meetings in a hurry, and it is not appropriate for the publicized conferences to be left blank. “data-reactid="55">It is not appropriate to hold meetings due to long-term strategies.
If this meeting is held in order to meet the needs of a long-term strategy, it is all the more strange that we must rush to open an emergency meeting.
The National Security Council, which was deliberately highlighted after the opening of this time, is not only the above-mentioned place.
For example, if the crisis is dealt with, the specific plan must be put forward after the meeting is completed, but after this solemn meeting, there is no specific policy; if the meeting is a long-term strategy, there is also no strategic conclusion. Even the strategically determined preconditions such as the setting of the core value position and the evaluation of the strategic environment are all blank.
The only thing that this conference clearly indicated was that it seemed to criticize Xi Jinping's amendment to the Constitution and abolish the term system of the chairman of the country, and said that Taiwan believes in democracy and is different from Beijing.
The problem is that this is something that everyone does not understand, so it is important to get all senior national security officials to meet in a meeting to produce valuable conclusions that can be widely publicized.
Perhaps the president solemnly convenes an emergency meeting not for the purpose of forming positions and countermeasures, but for displaying the position of the president in stably and effectively grasping the Guo'an machine and achieving the effect of the confidence of the settlers in the leadership of the president. Therefore, he does not propose any response. And measures, the details of the conference process published only with great fanfare to the outside world?
Only in this way, people with general anxiety and natural reality can't see specific policies and are not easy to feel at ease. Experts will also see that the national security authorities deal with national security issues when they are outsiders. Therefore, the effect and expectations of the president to strengthen people’s confidence are counter-productive.
After all, the way to make sure that the government exists effectively is not to emphasize to the public what kind of high-level emergency meeting the government has opened, but to put forward specific and effective strategies and policies.
國安竟然是不怎麼強的行政體中最弱的一環 ">Guo'an turned out to be the weakest link in the administrative system that is not strong enough. "Data-reactid="64">National Security is actually the weakest link in the administrative system that is not so strong."
In fact, at the end of 2015, the team that was about to come to power and handling the national security issue were of low quality. Since then, even though the Secretary General had already changed several positions, the situation did not improve, like the Ma Xihui, South China Sea fishing, and missed missiles. The position of the South China Sea, the abuse of the dogs by the Marines, the secrets of the Ma Xi Conspirators, and so on have all dealt with the ever-growing oolong. Now facing a grim international and cross-strait situation, the National Security Council has opened a splendid Oolong meeting.
The national security system has always been the weakest link in the overall weak administrative system. Anyway, can you not get it?
