.....
Sylvia 莲 tries to take advantage of the hawkers’ limited understanding of legal terms and pushes the blame onto them:
NEA is Politically Motivated to Tarnish the Image of AHPETC
http://www.ahpetc.sg/media-release-7-june-2013/
WTF???!!!...........What the hell is Sylvia 莲 trying to smoke?
Again, Sylvia莲, a former law lecturer just like her fellow former law lecturer Tey Tsun Hang, is trying to be as cocky as Tey. And just like Tey, Sylvia 莲 is also desperately trying to muddy the whole case with her bombastic legal slangs.
But, in simple layman term, Sylvia莲 is accusing the hawkers for being greedy and dishonest.
The hawkers, Sylvia莲 alleges, are greedily demanding the Hammerrhoids to provide them more ‘Extra Services’ in addition to the ‘Special Service’ which is supposedly to be performed to them for free.
If the ‘greedy’ hawkers were indeed putting a ‘separate request’ demanding the ‘good office’ of the Hammerrhoid Town Council to give them ‘Extra Services’ that is ‘not pursuant to its contractual obligation with the Town Council to do annual cleaning of the high areas at markets / hawker centres’, then why the hell is the ‘good office’ of the Hammerrhoid contractors giving the hawkers a quotation that is totally ‘in pursuant to its contractual obligation with the Town Council to do annual cleaning of the high areas at markets / hawker centres.’?
“I want your Extra Service and you still ask me to pay for your free Special Service, how can like that?”
Can Sylvia 莲 explain why the ‘good office’ of her contractors gives the hawkers a quotation that is about cleaning of the ceiling when she alleges that the hawkers are asking for something that is totally unrelated?
If Sylvia 莲 continues to insist that hawkers are greedy and dishonest, then she should show and elaborate the ‘separate request’ demanded by the ‘bad hawkers’ to the ‘good office’ of the Hammerrhoid Town Council.
What kind of separate request are the hawkers actually asking? Asking the ‘good office’ of the Hammerrhoid contractors to scratch their backside and kiss their ass?
......
Sylvia 莲 tries to take advantage of the hawkers’ limited understanding of legal terms and pushes the blame onto them:
NEA is Politically Motivated to Tarnish the Image of AHPETC
http://www.ahpetc.sg/media-release-7-june-2013/
….The latest attempt to substantiate this baseless claim was to show a quotation by the cleaning contractor ATL Maintenance Pte Ltd, who has clarified that it was in response to a separate request by the hawker association and not pursuant to its contractual obligation with the Town Council to do annual cleaning of the high areas at markets / hawker centres.
WTF???!!!...........What the hell is Sylvia 莲 trying to smoke?
Again, Sylvia莲, a former law lecturer just like her fellow former law lecturer Tey Tsun Hang, is trying to be as cocky as Tey. And just like Tey, Sylvia 莲 is also desperately trying to muddy the whole case with her bombastic legal slangs.
But, in simple layman term, Sylvia莲 is accusing the hawkers for being greedy and dishonest.
The hawkers, Sylvia莲 alleges, are greedily demanding the Hammerrhoids to provide them more ‘Extra Services’ in addition to the ‘Special Service’ which is supposedly to be performed to them for free.
If the ‘greedy’ hawkers were indeed putting a ‘separate request’ demanding the ‘good office’ of the Hammerrhoid Town Council to give them ‘Extra Services’ that is ‘not pursuant to its contractual obligation with the Town Council to do annual cleaning of the high areas at markets / hawker centres’, then why the hell is the ‘good office’ of the Hammerrhoid contractors giving the hawkers a quotation that is totally ‘in pursuant to its contractual obligation with the Town Council to do annual cleaning of the high areas at markets / hawker centres.’?
“I want your Extra Service and you still ask me to pay for your free Special Service, how can like that?”
Can Sylvia 莲 explain why the ‘good office’ of her contractors gives the hawkers a quotation that is about cleaning of the ceiling when she alleges that the hawkers are asking for something that is totally unrelated?
If Sylvia 莲 continues to insist that hawkers are greedy and dishonest, then she should show and elaborate the ‘separate request’ demanded by the ‘bad hawkers’ to the ‘good office’ of the Hammerrhoid Town Council.
What kind of separate request are the hawkers actually asking? Asking the ‘good office’ of the Hammerrhoid contractors to scratch their backside and kiss their ass?
......