- Joined
- Jul 24, 2008
- Messages
- 33,627
- Points
- 0
[h=2]Police Force, like PAP, is on AUTO-PILOT too![/h]
June 24th, 2012 |
Author: Contributions
Throughout the discussion of Dr Woof’s lenient sentencing, I believe one fundamental point has been missed out! While there is ongoing debate about how come he was charged under this section and not the other, how come he only received fine and no jail term, etc. . . But how much do we actually know about the case?
We know that even PAP’s own MP has questioned the sentencing, forcing the Law Minister to come out and explain the Prosecution & Judge’s decision. But before we dwell into which section shall the charge go under, I hope everyone can dig deeper into how the case happened.
What I heard was Dr Woof is quite a performance car enthusiast and has a number of cars in his garage. The cheapest of the lot is a Mercedes Convertible. So, my simple question is, with all his cars costing more than $300,000 each, what is the probability that he will hand it over to a 76 year old man?!
Is this man his father-in-law or some relative? Is Dr Woof such a generous man that I can walk up to him and ask to borrow his Ferrari and he will say YES? A 76 year old technician behind expensive wheels, speeding at 91 km/h, you don’t find this hard to believe?
The Traffic Police, like the PAP, has been on AUTO-PILOT for the last 20 years!! They are no longer critical in their thinking and are all going through the motion! When Dr Woof received the Notice for speeding and decided to submit his employee’s name instead, the police should have started the investigations then! Are they that gullible or are they just plain lazy and decided that Dr Woof can’t be lying? It was only until someone told the tale to CPIB YEARS later, then an investigation was carried out!
Moving forward to present time, our Law Minister said that he was charged under the particular section because the Police found NO evidence of reward given by Dr Woof. Not only does the Police not use this opportunity to dig thoroughly to make up for their lapse that happened years ago, they dare to conclude that no reward or bribe took place! You mean to tell me the technician’s salary is not a reward? If I were Dr Woof, I would have told the technician either you take the rap for me, or you can kiss this job good bye! Would the technician then have agreed to my request? Remember this is a 76 year old who definitely will not be able to find any work if he is fired by me!
This case fully illustrates the incompetence of the Police Force nowadays. If it does not, it only shows that they do not DARE ask more questions when the RICH commits a crime. So, my question to our Law Minister and the Minister for Home Affairs is, which is which? What happens to people like you and me when there exists two different sets of rules in our judicial system? One for the rich, when you should anyhow investigate and Two for the poor, when you should investigate as thoroughly as possible?
Only a NEW government can prevent such nonsense in the future!
The winds for CHANGE are blowing strongly once again!!
.
MC Hammer
.
Throughout the discussion of Dr Woof’s lenient sentencing, I believe one fundamental point has been missed out! While there is ongoing debate about how come he was charged under this section and not the other, how come he only received fine and no jail term, etc. . . But how much do we actually know about the case?
We know that even PAP’s own MP has questioned the sentencing, forcing the Law Minister to come out and explain the Prosecution & Judge’s decision. But before we dwell into which section shall the charge go under, I hope everyone can dig deeper into how the case happened.
What I heard was Dr Woof is quite a performance car enthusiast and has a number of cars in his garage. The cheapest of the lot is a Mercedes Convertible. So, my simple question is, with all his cars costing more than $300,000 each, what is the probability that he will hand it over to a 76 year old man?!
Is this man his father-in-law or some relative? Is Dr Woof such a generous man that I can walk up to him and ask to borrow his Ferrari and he will say YES? A 76 year old technician behind expensive wheels, speeding at 91 km/h, you don’t find this hard to believe?
The Traffic Police, like the PAP, has been on AUTO-PILOT for the last 20 years!! They are no longer critical in their thinking and are all going through the motion! When Dr Woof received the Notice for speeding and decided to submit his employee’s name instead, the police should have started the investigations then! Are they that gullible or are they just plain lazy and decided that Dr Woof can’t be lying? It was only until someone told the tale to CPIB YEARS later, then an investigation was carried out!
Moving forward to present time, our Law Minister said that he was charged under the particular section because the Police found NO evidence of reward given by Dr Woof. Not only does the Police not use this opportunity to dig thoroughly to make up for their lapse that happened years ago, they dare to conclude that no reward or bribe took place! You mean to tell me the technician’s salary is not a reward? If I were Dr Woof, I would have told the technician either you take the rap for me, or you can kiss this job good bye! Would the technician then have agreed to my request? Remember this is a 76 year old who definitely will not be able to find any work if he is fired by me!
This case fully illustrates the incompetence of the Police Force nowadays. If it does not, it only shows that they do not DARE ask more questions when the RICH commits a crime. So, my question to our Law Minister and the Minister for Home Affairs is, which is which? What happens to people like you and me when there exists two different sets of rules in our judicial system? One for the rich, when you should anyhow investigate and Two for the poor, when you should investigate as thoroughly as possible?
Only a NEW government can prevent such nonsense in the future!
The winds for CHANGE are blowing strongly once again!!
.
MC Hammer
.
