• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Smarter women have fewer children, researcher discovers

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
Joined
Jul 10, 2008
Messages
66,328
Points
113
Smarter women have fewer children, researcher discovers

By Amelia Wade
5:30 AM Saturday Aug 10, 2013


Women lose a quarter of their maternal urges for every 15 extra IQ points they have, according to international research and this may contribute to a dumbing down of society over time.

Research by London School of Economics psychologist Satoshi Kanazawa also found more intelligent people were more likely to drink, smoke and take drugs because "they are evolutionarily novel".

Using data from Britain's National Child Development Study, Mr Kanazawa studied the links between intelligence and maternal urges in women. He found more of the former meant less of the latter.

Even after adding controls for economics and education, the results remained the same - the more intelligent the woman, the less likely she was to have children.
Mr Kanazawa published his findings in his book, The Intelligence Paradox, and the research into the number of children compared with IQ was in the chapter titled "Why intelligent people are the ultimate losers in life".

He found that the more intelligent both men and women were in their childhood, the fewer children they wanted when they were older. Those who wanted no offspring when they were young had a mean IQ of 105.5, almost 7 points higher than those who did want children.
But while the level of intelligence affected whether women reproduced later in life, it did not affect men.

Mr Kanazawa, who lived in Christchurch for a year, said: "More intelligent women have fewer children in their lifetimes than less intelligent women. In contrast, more intelligent men, despite having wanted to have fewer children at age 23, do not actually have fewer children by age 47."

And he did not believe that smart women choosing to not have children had anything to do with their desire to pursue academics or a career. The psychologist believed that only childhood intelligence, not educational achievement or earnings, decreased the number of children women had.

This could have a negative impact on how smart society was.

"If more intelligent women have fewer children, and are more likely to have fewer children, and are more likely to remain childless, then one potential consequence is that the average level of general intelligence in society may decline over time."

Mensa New Zealand member and clinical psychologist Dr Aloma Parker said the lowering of society's general intelligence was a possibility, but unlikely because research showed traits tended to drift back to the norm.

Dr Parker has an IQ of above 133 and is in the top 2 percentile. She also has two children.

But she agrees that smarter women do have a tendency to have fewer children, especially since the advancement of birth control.

Successful Kiwis

Helen Clark: Former Prime Minister - no children
"Having children has never been something I've wanted to do because I value my personal space and privacy too highly. I cannot think of the sort of life I would want to have where I would want to give up those things for children.
"I've observed many friends and relatives with children over many years, and nothing that I've seen has led me to change my mind. I don't think it's just this job.
"The other thing is, I spend my whole life working with and on behalf of people. I take my hat off to people who can add families and family concerns on top of that, but I just don't think I could happily do it."
- Making Policy Not Tea, a 1993 book about women MPs

Theresa Gattung: Former chief executive of Telecom - no children
Annette Presley: Co-founder of ISP Slingshot - two children

Intelligent people according to Satoshi Kanazawa

• Liberals
• Atheists
• Night owls
• Homosexuals
• Childless
• Classical music lovers
• Binge drinkers, smokers
 
I don't see any vegans on the intelligent people list :D

Meat eating was an essential part of human evolution.

http://greatist.com/health/eating-meat-build-brain-121112

Researchers think they have finally found out why humans have larger brains than our evolutionary ancestors (even though gorillas, our closest living relatives, grow to three times the size of humans). The answer? Meat.

One study suggests that the high calories found in meat helped fuel the development of the human brain. The researchers believed it would’ve been impossible for early humans to gather enough calories from meat-free foods to feed their growing brains. If early humans had followed a raw diet (like gorillas), they would have had to eat for a total of nine hours every day in order to consume enough calories for proper brain development.

On the flip side, if gorillas were to develop a humanlike brain, they would need to eat 700 additional calories per day — an extra two hours of eating all those greens.
 
Meat eating was an essential part of human evolution.

http://greatist.com/health/eating-meat-build-brain-121112

Researchers think they have finally found out why humans have larger brains than our evolutionary ancestors (even though gorillas, our closest living relatives, grow to three times the size of humans). The answer? Meat.

One study suggests that the high calories found in meat helped fuel the development of the human brain. The researchers believed it would’ve been impossible for early humans to gather enough calories from meat-free foods to feed their growing brains. If early humans had followed a raw diet (like gorillas), they would have had to eat for a total of nine hours every day in order to consume enough calories for proper brain development.

On the flip side, if gorillas were to develop a humanlike brain, they would need to eat 700 additional calories per day — an extra two hours of eating all those greens.



Yes yes yes!!! Absolutely agree that meat eating was essential for our evolution. And is still essential for all aspects of human health including producing healthy and intelligent babies.
 
Meat eating was an essential part of human evolution.

http://greatist.com/health/eating-meat-build-brain-121112

Researchers think they have finally found out why humans have larger brains than our evolutionary ancestors (even though gorillas, our closest living relatives, grow to three times the size of humans). The answer? Meat.

One study suggests that the high calories found in meat helped fuel the development of the human brain. The researchers believed it would’ve been impossible for early humans to gather enough calories from meat-free foods to feed their growing brains. If early humans had followed a raw diet (like gorillas), they would have had to eat for a total of nine hours every day in order to consume enough calories for proper brain development.

On the flip side, if gorillas were to develop a humanlike brain, they would need to eat 700 additional calories per day — an extra two hours of eating all those greens.

What about homosexual vegans ? :D
 
Go and watch the movie Idiocracy. It explains everything.

[video=youtube;icmRCixQrx8]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=icmRCixQrx8[/video]

Breeding is for the dumb, the poor or the religious.
Often, a combination of all three.
 
hi there


1. aiyoh!
2. did such report ever mention that such gals also need sex or what?
3. having children or kosong kids is some personal choice.
 
Have less garbage and if bad genome just do not have any! Good quality genome just one is good enough otherwise bad QC it'll still turn out to be garbage!
 
Now we know why tonychat gets anal-fucked by his Thai ladyboy wife , daily :p
 
The article mentions helen clark. She is 8n the same league as ho ching in looks..only men with no taste will want her..so could it be tat smart women tend to b uglier?
 
Back
Top