• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious Sinkie Universities World’s Bestest! Huat Ah!

Pinkieslut

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Apr 14, 2011
Messages
18,093
Points
113
NUS and NTU top university rankings in Asia, 11th in world
Nanyang Technological University (NTU) has joined the National University of Singapore (NUS) in the top spot in Asia in an annual global ranking of universities that is read by educational institutions and governments.
In the Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) World University Rankings released this morning, NTU rose by one position and NUS retained its rank from last year, to share the top spot in Asia and 11th place in the world.
The Singapore Management University (SMU) climbed to 477th position from 500th last year.
The top three institutions worldwide on the list, which is in its 16th edition, are all from the United States: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University and Harvard University.
The QS rankings employ six performance indicators to assess a university's strengths in research, teaching, employability and internationalisation.
Global higher education consultancy QS said the latest result "sees the prospect of a Singaporean university entering the world's top 10 increase with NTU's improvement".
QS research director Ben Sowter said: "Prolonged appearances among the global top 20 have ensured that Singapore's leading universities have earned the right to classify themselves among the world's leading universities, according to our methodology and data set."
NTU received higher scores than NUS in faculty-to-student ratio and citations per faculty, an indicator of institutional research impact. NTU moved up 10 positions to 36th for research citations per faculty, with the highest score of 88.8 out of 100 among the three local institutions.
But NUS is more well-known among academics and employers than NTU, staying at 11th in the world for academic reputation with a score of 99.8, based on responses from over 94,000 academics.
With a score of 99.2, NUS also moved up four places to 14th for employer reputation, which is based on feedback from more than 44,000 employers about the quality of an institution's graduates.
NUS, NTU and SMU scored full marks for international faculty ratio, which measures the proportion of non-local faculty at an institution.
But compared with global faculty count, they received lower scores for international student ratio, which looks at the proportion of foreign students at an institution and provides an indicator of its ability to attract global talent.
NTU and NUS said the QS rankings show their efforts in research and education are being recognised. NUS and NTU have some 39,000 and 32,000 students respectively.
online-190619-worlduniversityrankings_1.jpg

An NTU spokesman said that along with the appointment of Professor Subra Suresh as president in January last year, the new leadership team has overseen the hiring of top talent in the past 1½ years.
For instance, the Presidential Post-doctoral Fellowship programme, started last year, attracted applications from nearly 900 young people from top global institutions for 12 positions this year.
It also set up in March the NTU Institute of Science and Technology for Humanity to study the impact of technology on society.
An NUS spokesman said: "We are honoured that many academics and employers around the world continue to regard NUS as among the best in Asia and globally... The remarkable global standing of our local universities attests to the quality of Singapore's higher education system."
 
SMU ranks low but it's more convenient if you want to go downtown to have fun after class. :wink:
 
How many retrenched PMET drivers are from NUS and NTU. Lol :D
If such rankings are a true reflection, they wouldn't be Grab or Gojek drivers. Lol :D
 
Imo online news nothing real:biggrin:
Today 1 article boast our local U and our airport
Tmrw another article say our local U and airport slide
What is what:biggrin:
Local media vs outside media
 
How do they rank these? Nothing from tokyo, seoul, mumbai or beijing. And these people build ships, planes, rockets, cars( electrics, hybrids, conventional), software, AI, robots......
 
Ranking like this are rubbish and easy for the institutions to game the system.
How they are ranked without any indication of their contribution to their country, society, human welfare or quality of life is a big joke.

The biggest flaw is the so called "Internationalization" criteria, where the proportion of faculty members/ students that are international are considered.
You can stuff your institutions by giving generous scholarships/jobs to all sorts of low quality foreigners to score on this and how does that make the universities better.
I bet the German and Jap universities score lowly on this but does it makes them inferior?
 
NTU and NUS scored high in the ranking because of their diversity, eg. numerous can't-speak-probably China and Indian professors.
 
I am happy that our PAP government's open legs (sorry its doors) policy had attracted a large number of foreign students in NUS and NTU making it great again. More international students please. Long live PAP, huat ahhhhhh!
Screenshot_20190620-143954_Chrome.jpg
20190419_135729.gif
 
Back
Top