• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Singapore survey shows ruling People's Action Party losing credibility

SNAblog

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Mar 9, 2009
Messages
1,489
Points
0
http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2011/07/08/business-as-singapore-politics_8555164.html


1290987515sg.jpg

"When people say that the members of Parliament are disconnected from the ground, or don't want to engage with the people, I find it hard to believe,.....We do what we think is right and sometimes, people won't be happy." - Vikram Nair, MP for Sembawang GRC


Associated Press
Singapore survey: Ruling party losing credibility
By ALEX KENNEDY , 07.08.11, 08:12 AM EDT

SINGAPORE -- Fewer Singaporeans consider the ruling People's Action Party to be credible after the party's worst election results since independence, a survey showed Friday.

About 73 percent of those polled agreed or strongly agreed that the PAP is a credible party, down from 87 percent in 2006, according to a survey by the Institute of Policy Studies, a think-tank within the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy at the National University of Singapore.

"The political consciousness of Singaporeans has changed very radically," said Chua Beng Huat, a sociology professor at NUS. "The PAP will probably continue to be the dominant party for the next twenty years, but we're moving toward a more normal, democratic culture."

The PAP has dominated Singapore political life since the country split from Malaysia in 1965. It won 60 percent of overall votes in a parliamentary election May 7, the lowest percentage since independence, while the Workers Party won six of 87 parliament seats, the most by an opposition party since the PAP came to power.

Voter discontent has grown in recent years as housing prices soared while wages stagnated amid a surge in foreign workers. Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong pledged after the vote to reconsider PAP policies and governing style, and ordered a review of minister salaries, which are among the highest in the world.

But the government so far hasn't expressed plans to make fundamental changes, such as establishing a minimum salary or easing the city-state's economic dependence on foreign workers.

"The election was a warning to the PAP not to be complacent and to seek new ways to reconnect to a younger and more demanding electorate," said Lam Peng Er, senior research fellow at the East Asian Institute. "But it's unclear whether the PAP will re-examine its economic model of development and be more open and transparent in policymaking to citizens."

The survey showed the most important election issues were the cost of living, efficient government and checks and balances in Parliament.

The telephone survey of 2,080 people aged 21 and above was conducted May 8-20. No margin of error was given. Normally, a poll that size would have an error margin of about 3 percentage points.

During the election campaign some PAP leaders acknowledged the perception that they sometimes govern in an arrogant or high-handed manner. Lee offered a rare public apology for PAP mistakes days before the vote.

However, some PAP leaders reject criticism that they are out of touch with the struggles of ordinary Singaporeans.

"When people say that the members of Parliament are disconnected from the ground, or don't want to engage with the people, I find it hard to believe," PAP Member of Parliament Vikram Nair said in a speech at a conference hosted by IPS. "We do what we think is right and sometimes, people won't be happy."

"Don't focus too much on the 40 percent that didn't vote for you," he said. "We have to remember and keep in mind the interests of the 60 percent that did."

Perhaps the biggest change since the election was the resignation of Lee Kuan Yew from the cabinet. The 87-year-old Lee, who is Lee Hsien Loong's father, was prime minister from 1959 to 1990 and subsequently held senior cabinet positions until May.

The senior Lee is credited with guiding the rise of Singapore from a sleepy port town into one of the richest and safest countries in the world. He also jailed some political rivals for years without trial and sued other opponents into bankruptcy with defamation cases. That helped isolate the opposition, which has just begun to emerge.

"One of the factors that will contribute to Singapore's road to democracy is the retirement of Lee Kuan Yew," Chua said. "A lot of the authoritarian atmosphere is the result of that one man's mentality."

Associated Press writer Heather Tan in Singapore contributed to this story.gl
 
Last edited:
"Don't focus too much on the 40 percent that didn't vote for you," he said. "We have to remember and keep in mind the interests of the 60 percent that did."

this idiot is kidding right? how about just drawing 60% of his salary?
 
"About 73 percent of those polled agreed or strongly agreed that the PAP is a credible party, down from 87 percent in 2006, according to a survey by the Institute of Policy Studies, a think-tank within the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy at the National University of Singapore."


It sounds like a stupid pro-PAP think-tank to me. If 60% (after much threatening and vote buying) voted PAP. How can 73% still think PAP is a credible party. The poll is flawed and baseless. It is reported to give PAP the credibility they don't deserved.
 
Last edited:
It sounds like a stupid pro-PAP think-tank to me. If 60% (after much threatening and vote buying) voted PAP. How can 73% still think PAP is a credible party. The poll is flawed and baseless. It is reported to give PAP the credibility they don't deserved.

this video tells how they get the results they want.

<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Hjh13hxehl4" width="425" height="344"></embed>
 
I doubt any of these 73% support the 12% energy price hike:(

Next election Sporeans must shout louder their opposition to the PAP's get rich quick schemes at the expense of lesser mortals. It's obvious the message hasn't got through.

Looks like it will take at least 51% of the seats to stop them:rolleyes:
 
Who the fuck is this AH NEI MP trying to kid?

40% voted against the MIWs.

There are at least 20-30% more that hates the MIW BUT that voted for the MIWs because of no balls or working Govt jobs.

SO altogether, there are at least 60-70% minimum that hates the MIWs in Singapore currently.
 
A few more Vikram Nairs is absolutely good for Singapore politics.

Please PAP, consider getting more such talents. Seriously!
 
There are at least 20-30% more that hates the MIW BUT that voted for the MIWs because of no balls or working Govt jobs.

SO altogether, there are at least 60-70% minimum that hates the MIWs in Singapore currently.


I too think that the percentage of votes against the PAP is much higher than 40%.

But I do not think that all of it is due to 'hate'. 'Disappointment' with the PAP, 'loss of trust', 'loss of faith' might be more accurate descriptors.

However the fact that they did not garner less votes than they should is not due to the guts of these voters. It is due to the opposition candidates. Some of them are not worth the votes. It is also due to their lack of credibility in delivering or their lack of track record in engaging. It is not a straightforward case of PAP vs the Oppositions. Rather it is a case of PAP vs gay rights, minimum wages, abolishment of death penalty, bad press over fights for territories, family rights over loyal supporters, 'my way or you get loss' type of management, etc.

It obscures the real issue: a vote on the performance of the PAP over the last five years.

In a way, this signifies a growing maturity that views oppositions as unequal in quality and calibre.

One side of the equation is ready. The other side is not.

I doubt the oppositions will ever have such an opportunity again. Especially if the PAP has changed.
 
It obscures the real issue: a vote on the performance of the PAP over the last five years.

In a way, this signifies a growing maturity that views oppositions as unequal in quality and calibre.

One side of the equation is ready. The other side is not.

I doubt the oppositions will ever have such an opportunity again. Especially if the PAP has changed.

People have simply got fed up over the betrayal, incompetence & greed of the PAP. It is the BIG factor :)

Betrayal: Sporeans are being replaced by foreigners with the blessing of the PAP. Gov't MPs talking about dumping our old in Batam, JB


Incompetence: lost of the billions of our CPF, the floods, the packed MRT, packed roads....

Greed: increasing cost of living in Spore when there is a recession going on. Increase in ERP, increase in electricity, increase in water costs,... All this when special groups are being favoured e.g. relatives of elities, FT,..

Somehow I don't expect the PAP to change their policies. The recent electricity rate hike is proof of that:rolleyes:

By the next GE there will be more angry unemployed Sporeans out there , less fear of the threats of an one old man, more foreigners causing unhappiness, more floods,.... You can bet that many will blame the AUTHORITIES for all their problems, the PAP :)

The PAP's worst enemy is themselves :rolleyes:
 
IMO, it is going to be a paradigm shift where people believe in the need for balance and competition to bring about the optimal policies. No more one party rule, it is too risky as evident in the effects especially over the last five years where irreparable damages had been done to the social fabric as one case in point. The solutions to keep us out of recession may not have been optimal. Thus, people may see the need for more expert opinion via opposition channels to enable competition of ideas, solutions,and forecast to tackle future issues.

Rather it is a case of PAP vs gay rights, minimum wages, abolishment of death penalty, bad press over fights for territories, family rights over loyal supporters, 'my way or you get loss' type of management, etc.
 
Back
Top