• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious [ Singapore News ] Singaporean Employers Beware of INDIAN Domestic Helper : Indian Maid Sexual Abuse Your Underage Child

grandtour

Alfrescian
Loyal
https://www.straitstimes.com/singap...who-sexually-exploited-employers-underage-son

18 months' jail for maid who sexually exploited employer's underage son

courtspix190615.jpg


Published
2 hours ago
Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Email
Shaffiq Alkhatib


SINGAPORE - A maid committed obscene and indecent acts with her employer's underage son and told the child that she had recorded a video of them engaging in sexual activities.

The woman, an Indian national, would threaten to show the clip to the minor's parents to silence him whenever they argued, Deputy Public Prosecutor Chee Ee Ling told the court.

At the time of the offences, the boy was only between 11 and 12 years old. Court documents did not state if the maid had actually recorded a video.

Following a five-day trial, District Judge Ng Peng Hong found the 33-year-old woman guilty of four counts of sexual exploitation and one count of causing alarm to the boy.

She was sentenced to one year and six months' jail on Nov 22. One of her defence lawyers, Mr Jonathan Cho from Covenant Chambers, told The Straits Times on Wednesday (Nov 28) that she will be appealing against her conviction and sentence.

The maid, who worked for the family between January 2015 and July 2016, cannot be named due to a gag order to protect the boy's identity.

During the trial, the boy testified that she had sexually exploited him on numerous occasions whenever he was alone at home with her and the offences started in January 2016.

According to court documents, the maid started priming the boy for sexual activities by first making an obscene gesture suggesting sexual intercourse before walking away.

The boy testified that a few days later, she called him to the kitchen and asked him to kiss her lips. The court heard that he then complied out of curiosity.

DPP Chee said: "These inappropriate kisses by the accused occurred about once a week and the duration and intensity of these kisses started to increase."

The DPP added that these kisses progressed to more intense sexual activities.

The boy told the court that, meanwhile, the maid would even refuse to bring him water when he asked for it and they had several arguments.

DPP Chee told Judge Ng: "Then one day, the accused suddenly told the victim that she has recorded a video of them engaging in sexual activities and she would show this video clip to her brother and the victim's parents. This alarmed and scared the victim, and whenever disputes arose between the accused and the victim, she would remind the victim that she has this video clip to silence him."

Matters came to a head on July 11, 2016, when the boy called his father and said the maid was about to hit him.

The man came home but the maid tried to convince him that nothing had happened. She then told the man: "Do you know what your son is doing?"

The agitated boy immediately fell silent and his father, sensing something was wrong, took him to a bedroom for a talk.

The child was in tears when he told his father about his encounters with the maid and the police were alerted five days later.

Mr Cho and two other lawyers from his firm, Mr Ronald JJ Wong and Mr Tedrick Chai, represented the woman pro bono. She did not have a lawyer to represent her through the trial and they came in only during the closing submissions.

Urging the court to acquit the woman, the lawyers said in their submissions that it was the boy who had behaved inappropriately towards their client by performing indecent acts.

The defence lawyers also claimed that the boy cooked up the story against her as he feared his own acts would be uncovered.

The woman is now out on bail. For each count of sexual exploitation, she could have been jailed for up to seven years and fined up to $20,000.


Topics:
 

AhMeng

Alfrescian (Inf- Comp)
Asset
https://www.straitstimes.com/singap...who-sexually-exploited-employers-underage-son

18 months' jail for maid who sexually exploited employer's underage son

courtspix190615.jpg


Published
2 hours ago
Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Email
Shaffiq Alkhatib


SINGAPORE - A maid committed obscene and indecent acts with her employer's underage son and told the child that she had recorded a video of them engaging in sexual activities.

The woman, an Indian national, would threaten to show the clip to the minor's parents to silence him whenever they argued, Deputy Public Prosecutor Chee Ee Ling told the court.

At the time of the offences, the boy was only between 11 and 12 years old. Court documents did not state if the maid had actually recorded a video.

Following a five-day trial, District Judge Ng Peng Hong found the 33-year-old woman guilty of four counts of sexual exploitation and one count of causing alarm to the boy.

She was sentenced to one year and six months' jail on Nov 22. One of her defence lawyers, Mr Jonathan Cho from Covenant Chambers, told The Straits Times on Wednesday (Nov 28) that she will be appealing against her conviction and sentence.

The maid, who worked for the family between January 2015 and July 2016, cannot be named due to a gag order to protect the boy's identity.

During the trial, the boy testified that she had sexually exploited him on numerous occasions whenever he was alone at home with her and the offences started in January 2016.

According to court documents, the maid started priming the boy for sexual activities by first making an obscene gesture suggesting sexual intercourse before walking away.

The boy testified that a few days later, she called him to the kitchen and asked him to kiss her lips. The court heard that he then complied out of curiosity.

DPP Chee said: "These inappropriate kisses by the accused occurred about once a week and the duration and intensity of these kisses started to increase."

The DPP added that these kisses progressed to more intense sexual activities.

The boy told the court that, meanwhile, the maid would even refuse to bring him water when he asked for it and they had several arguments.

DPP Chee told Judge Ng: "Then one day, the accused suddenly told the victim that she has recorded a video of them engaging in sexual activities and she would show this video clip to her brother and the victim's parents. This alarmed and scared the victim, and whenever disputes arose between the accused and the victim, she would remind the victim that she has this video clip to silence him."

Matters came to a head on July 11, 2016, when the boy called his father and said the maid was about to hit him.

The man came home but the maid tried to convince him that nothing had happened. She then told the man: "Do you know what your son is doing?"

The agitated boy immediately fell silent and his father, sensing something was wrong, took him to a bedroom for a talk.

The child was in tears when he told his father about his encounters with the maid and the police were alerted five days later.

Mr Cho and two other lawyers from his firm, Mr Ronald JJ Wong and Mr Tedrick Chai, represented the woman pro bono. She did not have a lawyer to represent her through the trial and they came in only during the closing submissions.

Urging the court to acquit the woman, the lawyers said in their submissions that it was the boy who had behaved inappropriately towards their client by performing indecent acts.

The defence lawyers also claimed that the boy cooked up the story against her as he feared his own acts would be uncovered.

The woman is now out on bail. For each count of sexual exploitation, she could have been jailed for up to seven years and fined up to $20,000.


Topics:
But this case is not as words against maid... It's 50:50 case leh..:biggrin:
 

grandtour

Alfrescian
Loyal
https://sg.news.yahoo.com/maid-sexu...-year-old-son-jailed-18-months-112001944.html

Maid who sexually exploited employer's 11-year-old son jailed 18 months

9416cb80-dc01-11e8-bbff-84df68a7c48d

Staff Writer, Singapore
Editorial Team
Yahoo News Singapore 30 November 2018

5373f4200cb79e3f29d8976736a51fc1

Singapore State Courts (AFP Photo/Mohd Fyrol)


Over four months, the maid sexually groomed her employer’s 11-year-old son and engaged in various sexual acts with him.

The 33-year-old maid later told the boy that she had recorded the acts on video in order to scare him into obeying her.

The maid, an Indian national, was convicted of five charges and jailed for 18 months last Thursday (22 November), following a five-day trial.

Four of these were for committing an indecent act with a child while one charge was for threatening the boy and causing him alarm.

The boy, now 14, and the maid cannot be named due to a gag order.

The maid, who was employed by the family in early 2015, began sexually grooming the boy by showing him an obscene gesture a year into her employment. A few days later, she asked the boy to kiss her on the lips before proceeding to commit an obscene act.

Later, the maid became emboldened and brought the boy to a bed. She carried out various sexual acts with the boy.

During the period, whenever the two had disagreements, the maid would tell the boy that she had recorded videos of them engaging in sexual acts. She threatened to show the videos to her brother and his parents, prompting the boy to obey her out of fear.

The offences came to light in July 2016 after the boy’s father found out his son was distressed.

The son called the father to say the maid was about to hit him. The father returned home but she tried to brush off the matter. The boy was about to complain to his father but kept quiet after the maid remarked, “Do you know what your son is doing?”

Suspecting something was amiss, the father brought the boy to the master bedroom where the boy confided to him about his ordeal.

During the trial, the maid strenuously denied committing the offences, claiming that the boy had only gone to the kitchen to “sayang” her.

The maid also accused a police officer who recorded her statement of raising his hands against her and claimed that she had not eaten for two days before the police interview.

The prosecution sought 24 months’ jail to be imposed on the maid.

“The accused’s offending acts in corrupting the victim and stealing his innocence, was not only selfish, it had also betrayed the trust reposed in her by the parents and would undoubtedly leave an indelible psychological impact on the victim,” said the Deputy Public Prosecutor Chee Ee Ling.

The maid will be appealing her conviction and sentence.
 

grandtour

Alfrescian
Loyal
https://sg.news.yahoo.com/maid-sexu...-year-old-son-jailed-18-months-112001944.html

Maid who sexually exploited employer's 11-year-old son jailed 18 months

9416cb80-dc01-11e8-bbff-84df68a7c48d

Staff Writer, Singapore
Editorial Team
Yahoo News Singapore 30 November 2018

5373f4200cb79e3f29d8976736a51fc1

Singapore State Courts (AFP Photo/Mohd Fyrol)


Over four months, the maid sexually groomed her employer’s 11-year-old son and engaged in various sexual acts with him.

The 33-year-old maid later told the boy that she had recorded the acts on video in order to scare him into obeying her.

The maid, an Indian national, was convicted of five charges and jailed for 18 months last Thursday (22 November), following a five-day trial.

Four of these were for committing an indecent act with a child while one charge was for threatening the boy and causing him alarm.

The boy, now 14, and the maid cannot be named due to a gag order.

The maid, who was employed by the family in early 2015, began sexually grooming the boy by showing him an obscene gesture a year into her employment. A few days later, she asked the boy to kiss her on the lips before proceeding to commit an obscene act.

Later, the maid became emboldened and brought the boy to a bed. She carried out various sexual acts with the boy.

During the period, whenever the two had disagreements, the maid would tell the boy that she had recorded videos of them engaging in sexual acts. She threatened to show the videos to her brother and his parents, prompting the boy to obey her out of fear.

The offences came to light in July 2016 after the boy’s father found out his son was distressed.

The son called the father to say the maid was about to hit him. The father returned home but she tried to brush off the matter. The boy was about to complain to his father but kept quiet after the maid remarked, “Do you know what your son is doing?”

Suspecting something was amiss, the father brought the boy to the master bedroom where the boy confided to him about his ordeal.

During the trial, the maid strenuously denied committing the offences, claiming that the boy had only gone to the kitchen to “sayang” her.

The maid also accused a police officer who recorded her statement of raising his hands against her and claimed that she had not eaten for two days before the police interview.

The prosecution sought 24 months’ jail to be imposed on the maid.

“The accused’s offending acts in corrupting the victim and stealing his innocence, was not only selfish, it had also betrayed the trust reposed in her by the parents and would undoubtedly leave an indelible psychological impact on the victim,” said the Deputy Public Prosecutor Chee Ee Ling.

The maid will be appealing her conviction and sentence.

CLASSIC INDIAN &
THEIR SNAKE MOVE
Indiancobra.jpg

hvVatum.gif

HBu5M5X.jpg
 

halsey02

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Maid must have learnt from kamasutra.:whistling:

She practiced...come and suck auntie position from Kumasutra... ha ha ha....Guess the race of the boy? we assume one iNDAIN as well...one horny Indian, with a insatiable sex appetite...better lock up your females from 1 to 99, when he is around.
 
Top