- Joined
- Nov 5, 2024
- Messages
- 199
- Points
- 28
In May 2025, Prime Minister Lawrence Wong unveiled his first Cabinet since formally assuming office. While it introduced six new ministers and retained several old hands, the announcement is widely seen not as a bold reset, but as an interim Cabinet — a placeholder, pending a deeper reshuffle expected midterm.
Many observers believe the real political maneuvering will happen in the coming years, once internal succession battles settle and electoral optics become less immediate. But the current lineup has already revealed much about the state of renewal — or the lack thereof — in Singapore’s ruling party.
Continuity in Disguise
The Cabinet features familiar names like Deputy Prime Minister Gan Kim Yong, whose political runway is visibly short. His retention, despite calls for generational change, reflects a cautious, conservative approach. Even with Lee Hsien Loong stepping aside as Prime Minister, the senior leadership structure remains largely intact — signaling a transition in name, not in substance.
The new ministers are plucked from the same system that produces the same leadership. Ex Army Leaders that was once SAF Oversea Scholar, elite civil servants and elites from private sector with strong link to the incumbent. Nothing new.
Ng Chee Meng: A Symbol of PAP’s Lack of Accountability
Nowhere is this more evident than in the case of Ng Chee Meng, a former Minister and NTUC Secretary-General, who was explicitly mentioned by Lawrence Wong during the post-election press conference as someone "still very much part of the team," despite being left out of the Cabinet — for now.
This isn’t a quiet exit or a reflection on performance. It's a strategic pause, hinting at his likely return in the midterm reshuffle.
Ng’s potential reinstatement is alarming for many Singaporeans. He is widely viewed as unpopular, having lost his seat in GE2020, and known for perceived character flaws — arrogance, lack of empathy, and a technocratic tone-deafness that alienated ground support. His leadership at NTUC failed to meaningfully energize the labour movement or regain trust among workers.
His expected return, despite no mandate and no real record of redemption, reflects a deeper institutional rot: a ruling party unwilling to hold its own accountable, even under new leadership. Lawrence Wong’s openness about Ng's temporary absence only underlines that little has changed beneath the surface.
More at urlr.me/sJKRNX
