• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Si beh chim..so he is guilty or not guilty?

red amoeba

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Jul 14, 2008
Messages
18,580
Points
113
U mean we find him guilty of 70% of criminal defamation?



No further action against British author Shadrake, says police
By Mustafa Shafawi | Posted: 23 June 2011 1218 hrs


Photos 1 of 1

Alan Shadrake (file)



SINGAPORE: The police said no further action will be taken against British author Alan Shadrake following investigations against him for criminal defamation.

A police statement said the Attorney-General has reviewed the investigation papers and concluded that although the investigation discloses the commission of several counts of criminal defamation, these arise essentially out of the same matrix of facts that had been considered in the recently concluded proceedings brought against Mr Shadrake for contempt of Court.

In view of this, police said the Attorney-General has directed that no further action be taken against Shadrake as there is no public interest in starting a further set of proceedings against him.

The 76-year-old author was sentenced in November last year to six weeks' jail and a fine of S$20,000 for contempt of court.

He was also ordered to fork out another S$55,000 in costs to the Attorney-General's Chambers.

He was found guilty of the offence due to eleven passages in his book, "Once a Jolly Hangman: Singapore Justice in the Dock."

They were found to have undermined the integrity of Singapore's judicial system.
 
Back
Top