-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Should SG golf courses be acquired right away to alleviate current overcrowding?
- Thread starter makapaaa
- Start date
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
- Messages
- 263
- Points
- 0
Go johore and get mugged! Mad suggestion
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2013
- Messages
- 890
- Points
- 0
any businessmen who can't afford a private jet to his favourite golfing place should close shop.
your turnover is not good enough! what gives you the goddam rights play on precious state lands?
your turnover is not good enough! what gives you the goddam rights play on precious state lands?
Last edited:
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2008
- Messages
- 110,944
- Points
- 113
Converting golf courses into residential areas to avoid overcrowding is like urinating to stop a forest fire.
It simply won't work.
More residential areas = more people and vehicles = worse overcrowding. It's simple logic.
Why is everyone fooled by the twisted narrative from the PAP govt?
I don't play golf, but it seems to me that the govt is attempting to grab land for cheap... again.
It simply won't work.
More residential areas = more people and vehicles = worse overcrowding. It's simple logic.
Why is everyone fooled by the twisted narrative from the PAP govt?
I don't play golf, but it seems to me that the govt is attempting to grab land for cheap... again.
Similar threads
