SHOCKING - 9/11 Twin Towers Destroyed by Alien Technology ???!!!

GOD IS MY DOG

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Apr 26, 2011
Messages
12,647
Points
113
how 1.2 million tons of concrete (3 buildings in total) turned to powder in 8 seconds ???.

Where is the seismic data of a 500,000 ton pile of steel and concrete falls to the ground at near free fall speeds?

Most engineers know that the study of blowing things up is a mature area of research. There is lots of data. We can calculated the velocities of a shock wave from photos; we can calculate the energy needed to create the kind of event that took place on 911.

The problem is that using conventional physics and trying to fit the known data from that day into these models doesn't work. No one has been able to do it!



some weird facts......................



The Twin Towers were destroyed faster than physics can explain by a free fall speed "collapse."
They underwent mid-air pulverization (dustification) and were turned to dust before they hit the ground.

The seismic impact was minimal, far too small based on a comparison with the Seattle King Dome controlled demolition.

The Twin Towers were destroyed from the top down, not bottom up.

The upper 80 percent, approximately, of each tower was turned into fine dust and did not crash to the earth.

The upper 90 percent, approximately, of the inside of WTC7 was turned into fine dust and did not crash to the earth.

One file cabinet with folder dividers survived. No toilets survived or even recognizable portions of one.

Windows of nearby buildings had circular and other odd-shaped holes in them.

### Evidence of molecular dissociation and transmutation, as demonstrated by the near-instant rusting of affected steel.

Weird fires. The appearance of fire, but without evidence of heating.

### Lack of high heat. Witnesses reported that the initial dust cloud felt cooler than ambient temperatures. No evidence of burned bodies.

Office paper was densely spread throughout lower Manhattan, unburned, often alongside cars that appeared to be burning.

Approximately 1,400 motor vehicles were towed away, toasted in strange ways, during the destruction of the Twin Towers.
 
Timing was way longer than 8 secs for each of them to fall apart. More like 20 sec each for each of WTC towers.

There are also very significant time intervals between fallings of each building. Many minutes.
 
Shoddy jobs on the pillars? "Honeycomb" effect and the pillars become porous and weak? Hahaha...just a wild guess!
 
Early rusting of steel in reinforced concrete is now a recognized fact because of imbedded moisture in the concrete. Should not be too great a surprise that this could lead to a failure of the entire concrete structure itself. The pre-stressed steel in the concrete strengthened the concrete by quite a bit in a well constructed structure. But once that is weakened, a total collapse of the concrete is the result. I am actually doubtful that everything fell down to earth in 8 seconds. It is quite possible that some pieces because of the disintegration or possible explosion from the planes might have been flung downwards, therefore at faster than free fall velocities. Other pieces could have been flung upwards instead. Maybe those moving upwards were not so obvious or were smaller particles. The larger pieces were more likely those pieces that went downwards earlier. If I could remember correctly, the dust took some time to settle down, days in fact.
 
Last edited:
Missile ?

[video=youtube;w-0Ms7mId34]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-0Ms7mId34[/video]


When you apply force downward and move the file outward, the tearing and grinding of a small iron block will become visible. That thing was probably weighing tons. Shifting and sliding will probably pulverize those stuff into dust particles in mid air.

Conspiracy theory again ? Flight 175 has no windows ! It's not a passenger plane, so what was that ? Military ? I can't find the video that speaks of the aircraft nosecone which is too weak to make an impact and much less penetrating right into the building. A missile could have launched to make way for the plane's nosecone penetration.



[video=youtube;jRC4lCQuBmc]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jRC4lCQuBmc&feature=related[/video]
 
Re: Missile ?

[video=youtube;JGW4nXE9LrE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JGW4nXE9LrE[/video]
 
Last edited:
Back
Top