sdp has taken over TOC

leetahbar

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Jul 15, 2008
Messages
15,744
Points
83
b4 that TOC has always been prejudiced against pap and never against sdp which is full of flaws. now that sdp has taken over toc, all the prejudices would be highly aggravated. why does sdp need to do that when they already have their own website?

Bryan Ti
Kumaran Pillai has taken over as Chief Editor of theonlinecitizen, which used to prominently proclaim itself non-partisan.

But I believe that KP is a member of SDP based on his participation in SDP activities (dressed appropriately in red) and his tweets about involvement in SDP's 'comms' committee.

Should the TOC Chief Editor be a member of a political party?
...
To ensure TOC's neutrality (at least in the perceived sense), and in the name of transparency and accountability, KP should now publicly declare his political affiliations if he wants to take over as its Chief Editor.

PS. KP can correct me if I have inadvertently mis-identified or mis-associated him here, and I will withdraw this post if proven wrong.
 
TOC is always very critical against the gov but seldom have i read one that criticise sdp. if sdp were to be so perfect, evidently they would be running sgp now instead of the pap.

as a "citizen's alternative voice", they should always be mindful to be neutral and not prejudice or worst blatantly critical for the sake of being cynical. in this aspect, it fails miserably to live up to their "credibility" issue.

we want to improve the gov and NOT destroy the gov which is the hidden motive of chee exploiting sdp. TOC shouldn't allow themselves to be another instrument in chee's insidious hidden motive. should the gov eventually clamp it down or bestow TOC with another "marxist conspiracy" theory, there'd won't be a lack of sympathy and frankly, if that ever happen, they deserve it.
 
Can someone please do a brief summary of these few webbie for me? Im truly blur over so many similar websites.

TRE, RE, TOC. These 3. I give an example.

Sammyboy Forum:
PRO Opposition. General TCSS. Founder/Owner: Leongsam. Ex Sinkie living in NZ now.
 
Hello Leetokcock,

Have ever asked whether the Editor-in-Chief of Shit Times has never been bi-partisan?

Or Mervyn Singh of TNP is a paid mole?

How about the Chua sisters?

and you?
 
So scroobal, what did I tell ya? Told you the pondan hiao cheebye leopard will never change it's spots. Remember how you removed my thread on THE CROCODILE HELPING THE MOUSEDEER TO CROSS THE RIVER when you were a moderator with considerable powers?
 
do u ve a feeling that the sdppies are getting rabid when their evil motives are being exposed?
 
So scroobal, what did I tell ya? Told you the pondan hiao cheebye leopard will never change it's spots. Remember how you removed my thread on THE CROCODILE HELPING THE MOUSEDEER TO CROSS THE RIVER when you were a moderator with considerable powers?

You have to cut some slack... in the past it took 75% of the forum threads, now only 1 every now and then.
 
You have to cut some slack... in the past it took 75% of the forum threads, now only 1 every now and then.

If not for all the concerted effort made, you think the pondan hiao cheebye will let up? Still no one believes he is actually 3WhiteTiger? Just watch....


Bob Sim Kheng Hwee, are you still masturbating every night over the high IQ beauty who spurned you? Please take a look at your fucking face in the mirror lah!:oIo::D:D:D
 
TOC is representative of another voice instead of the pappies' in the MSM. but that doesn't mean it has to be grossly exploited by the presence of sdppies which already have their own lame highly biased and dud website.

just like SDP itself is already a political party yet they need dud branches parties like SF and USD which are just purely duds that are doing nothing but only to confuse and con voters. did u see them in action in the last erection? they r grossly impotent and frigid which is typically sdp.

TOC is as good a goner pretty soon. i ve given up reading their articles which are usually prejudicially represented and do not represent any factual, rational and logical opinions.
 
Back
Top