Scrap GRCs, set aside Parliament seats for minority candidates: MARUAH

Confuseous

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
12,730
Points
113
Return to Singapore’s previous system of electing only one candidate per constituency.

Human rights activist group MARUAH issued this call on Monday as they presented a position paper in which they argued that the current group representation constituency (GRC) system allows "free-riders" to enter politics on the coattails of more established party members.

They pointed out that the GRC system, which was introduced in the late 1980s and enlarged in the mid-1990s, had the stated aim of ensuring minority representation in Parliament, but has since been widely criticised for creating an unlevel playing field between the ruling People’s Action Party and opposition parties.

Trust Singaporean voters to vote on merit, not on ethnic lines and should this fail, beef up ethnic minority representation by installing the closest losers as Members of Parliament (MPs) through the addition of seats, MARUAH said.

Through a return to the single member constituency (SMC) system, it is probable that elections would return a sufficient number of ethnic minority MPs, they said, pointing out that before GRCs were created, ethnic minorities were not under-represented in Parliament.

The group's report is the second of a series of papers on electoral reform in Singapore, the first of which touched on the secrecy of electoral votes.

Why now? MARUAH president Braema Mathi says it's time to take a good, hard look at Singapore’s electoral system while there is still time for change ahead of the next general election in 2016.

"In the current context of Singapore, where the population is becoming more mature in its thinking and approach, more discerning and more questioning, I think it's important that we do an appraisal of our electoral systems and offer suggestions as to what we think needs changing and why," she said in a phone interview with Yahoo! Singapore on Monday.

The paper argues that the GRC system, in Braema's words, "has outlived its purpose".

"We need to revisit this (the effectiveness of the GRC system)," said Braema. "We have tabulated all the arguments in Parliament and find that some of their arguments are very interesting, but nevertheless, it never came as a referendum (factoring in the views of the electorate), and was decided in Parliament. After so many years, it's ready for a review."

In Singapore's May 2011 general election, the People's Action Party (PAP) saw its share of the popular vote drop to a historic low of 60.14 per cent. Yet, PAP candidates won 81 out of 87 seats in parliament.
 
We need proportional representation. Ditch the first past the post system.
 
Asking pap to play fair and abolish GRC system is akin to asking them vile miws to donate their ill gotten money to charity
 
So have Little India for Indian candidates (Vivian not counted) Chinatown for Chinese Candidates urm where for Malay Candiates?

Eurasian? Don't tell me Punggol East. Too many Laura Ongs
 
again minority representation when we have so many kelings, malays and eurasians in parliment? WTF.
 
We need proportional representation. Ditch the first past the post system.

If the Papaya think that unity is strength using GRC they are committing suicide,
because by 2016 ppl hatred for papaya is so strong, they will be finished.

If they go individual poll maybe some will survived because not every apple are bad, so
the good apple example George Yeo, he's a real nice guy, b'cos he step somebodLee's toe
so he was placed at Aljunied constituency where WP was predicted to win!!

So Mr. Nice guy was out, any way blessing in disguised GY is very good hand overseas!!
good for him now earning even more money than poLeetics!!
 
If the Papaya think that unity is strength using GRC they are committing suicide,
because by 2016 ppl hatred for papaya is so strong, they will be finished.

If they go individual poll maybe some will survived because not every apple are bad, so
the good apple example George Yeo, he's a real nice guy, b'cos he step somebodLee's toe
so he was placed at Aljunied constituency where WP was predicted to win!!

So Mr. Nice guy was out, any way blessing in disguised GY is very good hand overseas!!
good for him now earning even more money than poLeetics!!

PAP must go en mass in 2016 and not earn anything after they are out of politics
 
From wat I see. This is nothing but minorities claming for more safe jobs just cos they r minorities. This is my post on the political section.

Reserve seats for minority is nothing but the tyranny of the minority. Isnt Singapore a meritocratic country? If that the case, than i vote for the best candidate not based on the colour of his or her skin. Race base politics is nothing but going back to old days. If the MP is chinese but look after the constituents well,,what is the problem.?
 
Last edited:
The PAP won't scrap the GRC system no matter what happens..

There is a big chance of many big shot Pappy Ministers being kick out of Office if you put them in a one on one battle during a GE..

Scumbags like Zorro Lim, MBT won't see the light of the day.. The PAP will not risk that..
 
Last edited:
From wat I see. This is nothing but minorities claming for more safe jobs just cos they r minorities. This is my post on the political section.

Reserve seats for minority is nothing but the tyranny of the minority. Isnt Singapore a meritocratic country? If that the case, than i vote for the best candidate not based on the colour of his or her skin. Race base politics is nothing but going back to old days. If the MP is chinese but look after the constituents well,,what is the problem.?

Little to do with minority tyranny....I'm sure not many minority sinkies base their votes on the race or religion of the MP candidates.
It's all the BS from pap to get what they want....that's why we must kick them out or at least deny them a 2/3 majority so that they cannot suka suka change the constitution
 
From wat I see. This is nothing but minorities claming for more safe jobs just cos they r minorities. This is my post on the political section.

Reserve seats for minority is nothing but the tyranny of the minority. Isnt Singapore a meritocratic country? If that the case, than i vote for the best candidate not based on the colour of his or her skin. Race base politics is nothing but going back to old days. If the MP is chinese but look after the constituents well,,what is the problem.?

You ever noticed minorities and i believe they are mostly malay or indian demanding more and more and more and nit picking on everything. Like we have some m&d getting offended that we have xin msn cause it sounds like chinese instead of mudyoyo msn.

As if they don't fight amongst themselves. Malays and indians aren't that united just that some indians are muslim so they marry with malays and take up malay culture anyway.
 
Little to do with minority tyranny....I'm sure not many minority sinkies base their votes on the race or religion of the MP candidates.
It's all the BS from pap to get what they want....that's why we must kick them out or at least deny them a 2/3 majority so that they cannot suka suka change the constitution

but this group doesn't seem to be a pappy group. Fucking sick and tired of them demanding shit from the majority all the time.
 
I hope that the PAP will be denied the 2/3 majority,,,but knowing singaporeans,,give them a bit of crumbs from the table they happy like crap...so its going to be an uphill battle,,,furthermore the 3rd rate oppos will spoil it all..like CSJ and Got More shit and maybe kenneth J...so will be hard lah,,but all can live in hope...

Little to do with minority tyranny....I'm sure not many minority sinkies base their votes on the race or religion of the MP candidates.
It's all the BS from pap to get what they want....that's why we must kick them out or at least deny them a 2/3 majority so that they cannot suka suka change the constitution
 
Back
Top