Scoot - where is the compensation?

winnipegjets

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Jul 19, 2011
Messages
28,058
Points
113
Technical fault was principal cause of flight delays: Scoot

SINGAPORE - Budget airline Scoot issued a statement on Tuesday apologising for its recent flight delays, and explaining that the disruption was mainly due to a technical fault.

Scoot flight TZ8 to Perth was delayed for more than 22 hours last weekend, much to the ire of its passengers. The flight was originally scheduled to depart from Singapore at 12.10pm last Saturday but got rescheduled to 9.50am on Sunday, before eventually taking off at 10.42am.

Scoot's chief executive officer Campbell Wilson said in the statement that the principal cause of the disruption was a technical fault experienced when flight TZ220 arrived at Hong Kong on Friday morning.

"Initial attempts to resolve the issue failed and, ultimately, a spare part and team of engineers had to be dispatched from Singapore."

"With a small fleet and one aircraft out of action in Hong Kong a number of flights were rescheduled, including Saturday's TZ8 from Singapore to Perth."

A "tyre issue" was also detected during checks prior to flight TZ8, requiring a wheel to be changed over three hours, Mr Wilson added.

"Regrettably, this new delay meant that the operating crew could not complete the flight in their legal duty time and were obliged to stand down but, because of earlier rescheduling of flights, no standby crew were available. Consequently, TZ8 was delayed overnight until a new, rested crew was available."

Mr Wilson also said that hotel accommodation is "not assured" in the event of a flight disruption, and that travel insurance is "highly recommended".

"These conditions are made known to and are acknowledged by every passenger at the time of booking," he said.


"The safe operation of our airline is paramount and will not be compromised. Occasional technical issues nonetheless happen, to any airline, and the smaller the fleet, the larger the effect on schedules."

Flight TZ221, which was supposed to depart from Hong Kong at 7.10am last Friday, was also rescheduled to 7pm the following day.

Mr Wilson pointed out that Scoot chose to provide hotel accommodation in Hong Kong to passengers on TZ221, as well as lounge access and food and beverage vouchers at Changi Airport to those on TZ8. Compensation vouchers were also given to guests on both flights, he said, adding that Scoot is reviewing the handling of these two flights to refine its processes and procedures.

"We again apologise to those affected, assure them that their safety was at the core of our actions at all times, and commit that we will learn from this experience."

[email protected]
 
In the United States, the Transportation Department imposes a fine of $27,500 per passenger for planes left on the tarmac for more than four hours without taking off.[8]

European legislation (see Regulation 261/2004) states that flight delays for over three hours, cancellations and denied boarding entitles passengers to a compensation of up to €600 per passenger from the airline.[9]
 
"With a small fleet and one aircraft out of action in Hong Kong a number of flights were rescheduled, including Saturday's TZ8 from Singapore to Perth."

If no money to buy plane, then SCOOT should shut down lah. One aircraft and major disruption. Reputation tarnish and who wants to fly SCOOT next time?
 
Mr Wilson also said that hotel accommodation is "not assured" in the event of a flight disruption, and that travel insurance is "highly recommended".

"These conditions are made known to and are acknowledged by every passenger at the time of booking," he said.

Sinkapore is a developed country mah ...why not adopt the EU standard or at least the US standard where accommodation and food MUST be provided when delay is caused by technical problems.
 
I have flown Tiger, Airasia, Jetstar,.... With Tiger it was when they were new & found the service ok. Stopped taking Tiger because of the problems I had booking flights because as a Mac computer user I had some problems with their online booking system. I emailed Tiger about the problems but they didn' t seem to care. So I started using Airasia. These airlines have better schedules for where I want to go. Did take a look a Scoot but their schedule is pretty limited.

I have experienced delays with Airasia but it is usually only for 30 to 45 minutes. There was one time when the delay was for a few hours & they did provide a meal ticket as compensation. The main reason I stopped taking Airasia was because when flying to Bangkok they use the old Don Muang airport. I prefer Suvarnabhumi because you can take a MRT train from Suvarnabhumi to Bangkok, no taxi ques or traffic jams.
 
Continue your story leh, how about Jetstar? :p

I have flown Tiger, Airasia, Jetstar,.... With Tiger it was when they were new & found the service ok. Stopped taking Tiger because of the problems I had booking flights because as a Mac computer user I had some problems with their online booking system. I emailed Tiger about the problems but they didn' t seem to care. So I started using Airasia. These airlines have better schedules for where I want to go. Did take a look a Scoot but their schedule is pretty limited.

I have experienced delays with Airasia but it is usually only for 30 to 45 minutes. There was one time when the delay was for a few hours & they did provide a meal ticket as compensation. The main reason I stopped taking Airasia was because when flying to Bangkok they use the old Don Muang airport. I prefer Suvarnabhumi because you can take a MRT train from Suvarnabhumi to Bangkok, no taxi ques or traffic jams.
 
I have flown Tiger, Airasia, Jetstar,.... With Tiger it was when they were new & found the service ok. Stopped taking Tiger because of the problems I had booking flights because as a Mac computer user I had some problems with their online booking system. I emailed Tiger about the problems but they didn' t seem to care. So I started using Airasia. These airlines have better schedules for where I want to go. Did take a look a Scoot but their schedule is pretty limited.

I have experienced delays with Airasia but it is usually only for 30 to 45 minutes. There was one time when the delay was for a few hours & they did provide a meal ticket as compensation. The main reason I stopped taking Airasia was because when flying to Bangkok they use the old Don Muang airport. I prefer Suvarnabhumi because you can take a MRT train from Suvarnabhumi to Bangkok, no taxi ques or traffic jams.

Don Muang airport is more... retro and atmospheric. Depends on what you want to do in Thailand. At Don Muang you may also transfer to one of their domestic budget airlines (Nok Air?) and fly off to another city in Thailand.
 
If no money to buy plane, then SCOOT should shut down lah. One aircraft and major disruption. Reputation tarnish and who wants to fly SCOOT next time?

Then the people should make Scoot shut down, by boycotting it.
 
Continue your story leh, how about Jetstar? :p


Jetstar is the budget airline I am currently using if I visit Bangkok. I notice that it is not as popular with the PRC chinese as Airasia. There might be PRC passengers but so far they have been properly behaved & not as rowdy as those flying with Airasia.
 
Don Muang airport is more... retro and atmospheric. Depends on what you want to do in Thailand. At Don Muang you may also transfer to one of their domestic budget airlines (Nok Air?) and fly off to another city in Thailand.

If I was taking a cab to Bangkok, I would prefer Don Muang because it is closer to Bkk. However Suvarnabhumi is better if you are going to Pattaya because it is nearer to that place. It also has MRT train services to Bangkok. I heard that in future the train services will be extended to Pattaya.
 
Back
Top