• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

SC Hri Kumar's disastrous & disgusting "honest" CPF discussion

Confuseous

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
12,730
Points
113
Well if that was the underlying message, then the people overseeing the CPF monies of Singaporeans can sod off: don’t forget that the CPF is a significant monthly deduction off the salaries of 99% of Singaporeans– for the ones lucky enough to make millions in a year, be it by means of merit or simply having the good karma and a lifetime membership to the 1% lucky sperm club being born into rich families, the maximum monthly contribution of $5,000, or $60,000 a year is probably small change; but for the rest of us who aren’t lucky to be holding multi-million dollar ministerial jobs or are CEOs of our daddy’s companies, the monthly contribution deduction of 20% of salaries is a sizeable chunk especially for those earning below SGD 3,000 a month.

So rich as this auntie may be, are you telling me she has no right to claim back her CPF monies that she contributed during the course of her adult working life just because she lived in a larger house than the FAP idiot who put up the post? Incidentally, those blokes clearly need to brush up on their English if they’re going to be spamming everyone with their brainless comments, lest we start thinking the ruling party has serious issues with the selection criteria of their league of defenders on the World Wide Web.

Get real: she has every right to do it, and I don’t care if half the Members of Parliament and Cabinet Ministers disagree with me.

And dig this — did it occur to our dear million-dollar MP to at least have one representative from the Central Provident Fund Board to help answer questions? Maybe then, there wouldn’t be “questions and more questions”, to quote the official news media.

http://alphamalesyndrome.wordpress.com/2014/06/17/disgusted-by-pap-supporters-response/#more-2127
 
Is he hiding his tail somewhere?


article-2660148-1ED9495D00000578-611_308x185.jpg
 
Senior Counsels are supposed to be the top lawyers in this tiny dot, equivalent, as claimed by the PAP, to UK's Queen's Counsels.

This PAPpy doesn't exude any intellectual prowess deserving of that designation.
 
Back
Top