Serious Putin: When Ang Moh Trump and myself hit the nuke button there w b NO SURVIVORS!

Ang4MohTrump

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Nov 29, 2016
Messages
5,674
Points
63
[video=youtube_share;-fajGIA_0dw]https://youtu.be/-fajGIA_0dw[/video]

[video=youtube_share;GfRhd3VEt78]https://youtu.be/GfRhd3VEt78[/video]


https://www.rt.com/news/391171-oliver-stone-putin-hot-war/



‘Nobody would survive’: Putin to Oliver Stone on ‘hot war’ between Russia & US

Published time: 7 Jun, 2017 00:17
‘Nobody would survive’: Putin to Oliver Stone on ‘hot war’ between Russia & US
© SHOWTIME / YouTube
2K2
No country on earth would survive should the world’s most powerful nuclear states unleash their atomic weapons, Vladimir Putin has said. His remarks form part of a series of interviews with American film director Oliver Stone.
The question of whether the human race would survive a potential global nuclear war has tormented the minds of generations, and indeed Stone, who wondered if the Russian president believes the US might emerge victorious if such a conflict were to break out.

“In a hot war is the US dominant?” the American director asked the Russian president.

“I don’t think anyone would survive such a conflict,” Putin replied in a short Showtime teaser, a precursor to a documentary titled 'The Putin Interviews' that will be aired next week.


Putin then proves he has the pulse on Russia’s military strategy and tactics. As part of the preview, the clip shows Stone and Putin in the situation room where the Russian leader demonstrated that his on top of developments playing out in the Syrian military theater.

“Pilot says he is going to make another attempt,” Putin tells the US director while showing him a live feed from a military jet on a smartphone.

READ MORE: Putin gives Oliver Stone a lift, says Snowden not a traitor, but ‘what he did was wrong’

Stone then asks if there’s “any hope of change” in US-Russian relations, which both countries have acknowledged are at the lowest point since the Cold War.

“There is always hope. Until they are ready to bring us to the cemetery and bury us,” Putin replied.


Apart from the teaser, Showtime has also uploaded two separate interview segments that touched on Russia-NATO relations and the numerous assassination attempts on the Russian president.

Describing NATO an an instrument of American foreign policy, Putin said the alliance’s members inevitably become US “vassals.”

READ MORE: Putin to Oliver Stone: I suggested Russia joining NATO to Clinton, he ‘didn’t mind’

“Once a country becomes a NATO member, it is hard to resist the pressures of the US. And all of a sudden any weapons system can be placed in this country. An anti-ballistic missile system, new military bases and if need be, new offensive systems,” Putin explained.

Russia, Putin says, is forced to take countermeasures over the ever-increasing NATO threat and armed military build-up on Russia’s borders.

“We have to aim our missile systems at facilities that are threatening us. The situation becomes more tense,” Putin said.


In the third clip, published Tuesday by Showtime, Stone claimed he had credible information that the Russian leader survived at least five assassination attempts, which Putin implied were successfully thwarted by his security team.

“I do my job and the Security Officers do theirs, and they are still performing quite successfully,” Putin said, adding, “I trust them.”

Recalling a Russian proverb, Putin told Stone that “those who are destined to be hanged are not going to drown.”

READ MORE: ‘It's very important we hear what Putin has to say’ – Oliver Stone

“What is your fate sir, do you know?” Stone asked.

"Only God knows our destiny – yours and mine,” the President replied.

“One day, this is going to happen to each and every one of us. The question is what we will have accomplished by then in this transient world, and whether we’ll have enjoyed our life?”


0592948dea.jpg
 
[video=youtube_share;mDP7ik2wBzs]https://youtu.be/mDP7ik2wBzs[/video]


0592948dea.jpg
 
It is still possible for Putin to do a good 1st strike, with accurate surveillance to locate each & every US Ohio Class Subs, and eliminate all of them at 1st strike, hence USA have nothing to counterstrike against Putin. Putin is still fucking too kind and civilized and lack the Brute in Kim Jong Nuke / Duterte, or I think he is actually pretending to be civilized for the interview for publicity sake.

Effective nuke 1st strike must be very well planed and synchronized, and with very good intelligence surveillance. Intelligence can be captured by hacking Pentagon & White House, spies, kidnap enemies' key persons (e.g. generals) to extra info, Trojans & many dirty tricks. It should also be synchronized with Cyber-attack, satellites & fiber network sabotage, assassinations, etc, to cripple counter-strike and interception capacities. The point-blank shots must be launched from submarines sneaking very close to targets, which fires EMP nuke, which a single warhead blast 300+km in space above the USA can fuck whole USA & Canada's electrical grids, all electrical & electronic devices, including defense computers, radars, missiles, warplanes, satellites, phones & Internet, to be fried instantly by an enormous electromagnetic impulse.

These can make counter-strike by USA next to impossible, and will die completely sitting duck during Putin's 1st strike.

The other crucial thing is 100% ready your own interceptions to prevent counter-strikes from e.g. overseas US bases, but these are very minor capacity, if Putin can wipe out Ohio Class subs, there is no massive counter-strike to worry about, each Ohio sub got 20+ SLBMs with each up to 10 warheads, but Putin knows that good half of them are in poor non-usable conditions. In the oversea bases, there are small amount of nukes essentially for tactical strikes during unexpected emergencies, essentially not meant for a dooms day counter-strike, quantity far less than what it will take to wipe out Russia. The amount of S-400s Putin has got around Moscow is enough to block these.

http://www.futurescience.com/emp.html


he topic of nuclear electromagnetic pulse (EMP) is very mysterious to most people, and it is quite commonly misunderstood. It is also the subject of a large amount of misinformation. (It is a serious and persistent problem that many people want to ignore the science and make it into a political issue; or even worse, into a matter of Hollywood fantasy.) There are many additional EMP pages on this site, including separate pages on EMP personal protection, Soviet nuclear EMP tests in 1962, and on other EMP related topics including a separate page of notes and technical references. There is also a very important page about widely-believed EMP myths and a Site Map of EMP Pages on this web site. Much of the information here describes the possible effects of EMP on the continental United States, but the information can be used to describe the effects on any industrialized country......


Unlike Russia & China, USA do not have any land mobile TEL trucks / MRT / Trains, and only have nukes on fixed silos(Minuteman ICBMs), submarines(Tridents & Tomahawks), strategic bombers(B-52/B1/B2+Tomahawks), F-22/35 can do tactical short-ranged Tomahawk strikes but far too ineffective for dooms days counter-strikes. Chinese & Russian got lots of mobile land trucks & trains to fire ICBMs, Chinese even got tremendous underground network of tunnels called Nuke Great Wall Underground, the significance of that is giving Chinese multiple-rounds of counter-strike chances, that even if Ang Moh Trump could nuke China 4~5 times / rounds still there could be ICBMs surviving inside their deep tunnels to emerge and strike back.
 
Last edited:
USA Pentagon acknowledged that Xijinping's DF-26 IRBMs can nuke Guam to vaporise!

df26.jpg



http://www.straitstimes.com/asia/ea...ble-to-send-nukes-to-western-pacific-pentagon

China's missiles able to send nukes to Western Pacific: Pentagon
Military vehicles carrying DF-26 ballistic missiles participate in a military parade at Tiananmen Square in Beijing to mark the 70th anniversary of victory over Japan and the end of World War II on Sept 3, 2015.
Military vehicles carrying DF-26 ballistic missiles participate in a military parade at Tiananmen Square in Beijing to mark the 70th anniversary of victory over Japan and the end of World War II on Sept 3, 2015.PHOTO: AFP
Published
2 hours ago

WASHINGTON (BLOOMBERG) - China deployed new ballistic missiles last year capable of delivering nuclear warheads to ground targets in the Western Pacific, the Pentagon said.

The intermediate-range Dongfeng-26 rockets could also be used for conventional strikes against ships in the region, the US Department of Defence said in its annual report on China's military.

The deployment has been anticipated since at least September, when the missiles were displayed during a military parade hosted by President Xi Jinping.

The weapons represent China's latest strategic advancement after two decades of budget increases that turned it into the world's second-largest military spender.
Get The Straits Times
newsletters in your inbox
Sign Up

The modernisation drive, which has focused on expanding China's air and naval reach, is challenging more than 70 years of US military dominance in the Western Pacific.

In 2016, Xi also began a sweeping structural overhaul of the military that saw the elevation of China's rocket force to a branch equal with the army, navy and air force.

The DF-26 joins an arsenal that includes DF-21 "carrier killer" missiles.

The report confirmed that China's Jin-class submarines are now equipped with JL-2 submarine launched ballistic missiles, boosting its sea-based nuclear deterrence. The Pentagon has been predicting since at least 2014 that China would carry out patrols of the submarines with the missiles aboard.

The Pentagon report noted several security developments regarding China, including cooling relations with Taiwan, drone sales to Pakistan, the construction of a military base in Djibouti in Africa and the continued use of "low-intensity coercion" tactics in the disputed South China Sea.

The report comes days after US Defence Secretary James Mattis attended a security forum in Singapore and warned China against actions that "impinge on the interests of the international community, undermining the rules-based order that has benefited all countries."

Senior Colonel Zhao Xiaozhuo, a member of China's delegation, said during the event that "China wants to use diplomatic and peaceful means, but not military force" to settle differences.

Beijing has opposed the deployment of a US missile shield in South Korea to defend against attacks from North Korea, in part because it says it could be used to counter China's capabilities.

0592948dea.jpg
 
Back
Top