1. IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Members are encouraged to install GOM or HOLA or TUNNELBEAR for an added layer of protection.

    The SEX forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Putin revenge Syria attack by HUNTING DOWN BRITISH NUKE SUB, UK SOS! SOS!

Discussion in 'The Courtyard Café' started by tun_dr_m, Apr 17, 2018 at 11:54 PM.

  1. tun_dr_m

    tun_dr_m Alfrescian Old Timer

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2008
    Messages:
    2,839
    Likes Received:
    25
    Trophy Points:
    48
    http://www.sohu.com/a/228548048_243255

    [​IMG]
    高峰军事观察
    1448文章
    3.4亿总阅读
    查看TA的文章>
    20
    • 分享到


    北约第二大国核潜艇这次真丢脸,被俄罗斯舰机围剿只剩呼救的份儿
    2018-04-17 15:20 核潜艇 /俄罗斯 /英国
    北约空袭叙利亚过后,相关的争议话题很多。包括美英法巡航导弹的性能、打击效果,以及叙军和俄罗斯装备的反应能力和拦截成果真伪等等。但与这些问题相关的数据大部分都是各说各话。美国称所有的战斧导弹和空射隐身对地导弹全部命中目标,而俄罗斯称有71枚导弹被叙军的老旧俄制防空导弹成功拦截。俄罗斯专家嘲讽称,三国的这次导弹联合打击等于花大钱为俄罗斯的防空武器做了广告。

    [​IMG]

    英国是北约第二大军事强国,也是美国在中东多场军事行动的拥趸。根据《金融时报》战前提供的消息称,英国有6架“台风”战斗机、8架“狂风”战斗机和一架空中加油机驻扎在塞浦路斯的皇家空军基地。该地还配有武装侦察无人机和正在执行北约任务的皇家海军的45型驱逐舰。为此次行动,英国还向地中海派了一艘配有“战斧”巡航导弹的机敏级攻击核潜艇。

    不过英国的攻击核潜艇恰恰是这两年来最受争议的装备。2017年2月10日,英国《太阳报》报道,英国皇家海军的3艘超现代化机敏级攻击核潜艇(每艘价值12亿英镑)频发技术故障,而4艘特拉法尔加级潜艇已几乎不能使用。英国海军少将佩里说:“英国花了10亿买的45型驱逐舰吵得要命”。英国海军官员更说俄国潜艇在100里以外都可以听到这些船。

    [​IMG]

    这七艘核动力攻击潜艇原先均被部署于“受到伊朗威胁”的贸易路线进行巡航,并密切关注俄罗斯在大西洋的一举一动。《太阳报》表示,这是近几十年以来英国首次没有攻击潜艇针对威胁处于待命状态。因为害怕来自高层的震怒,英国国防部乃至国防大臣都集体向首相隐瞒了此事。一位英国政府官员透露,“对于这些丑闻,没人实话实说。”

    [​IMG]

    这些英国媒体透露的内幕或许只是炒作,实战表现才是检验实力的唯一标准。但这次地中海针对叙利亚的联合打击行动,不但没有为英国海军“正名”反而真丢脸了。英国《泰晤士报》16日援引消息人士的话报道称,英国的这艘机敏级核潜艇未能参与对叙军事行动,因为不得不应对俄罗斯两艘“基洛级”常规潜艇的围追堵截。此外,英国潜艇还不得不躲避两艘俄罗斯护卫舰和一架反潜机。

    [​IMG]

    尽管潜艇在空袭之前几天都极力避免被发现(看来英国机敏级核潜艇刚进入地中海东部就被盯上了),但最后还是无法靠近预定战位并完成对叙进行军事打击无功而返。消息人士还透露,俄罗斯海军的海空潜立体反潜相当有效,令这艘机敏级潜艇只有招架之功了。在最危急的时刻英国核潜艇不得不向周边的美国友军呼救。最终靠美舰和P8反潜机迫使俄罗斯潜艇退出。返回搜狐,查看更多

    声明:本文由入驻搜狐号的作者撰写,除搜狐官方账号外,观点仅代表作者本人,不代表搜狐立场。
    阅读 (13万)
    不感兴趣 投诉


    Peak military observation

    1448 articles
    340 million total reading

    ">View TA's Articles>

    20

    share to

    The NATO’s second-largest nuclear submarine was really embarrassed. It was encircled by Russia’s warships and only left to call for help.
    2018-04-17 15:20
    Nuclear submarine
    /
    Russia
    /
    United Kingdom

    After NATO’s air strikes against Syria, there are many related topics of controversy. Including the performance of the US-British-France cruise missiles, the effectiveness of strikes, and the ability to respond to Syrian and Russian equipment, as well as the authenticity of interception results. However, most of the data related to these issues speak differently. The United States claimed that all Tomahawk missiles and air-launched stealth-to-ground missiles hit all targets, while Russia claimed that 71 missiles were successfully intercepted by the Syrian Army’s old Russian air defense missiles. Russian experts ridiculed that the missile strikes of the three countries were equal to spending large sums of money to advertise Russian air defense weapons.

    The United Kingdom is the second largest military power in NATO and is also a fan of the United States’ many military operations in the Middle East. According to the information provided by the Financial Times before the war, there are six Typhoon fighter aircraft, eight Fighter fighter aircraft and one air refueling aircraft in the British Royal Air Force base in Cyprus. The area is also equipped with armed reconnaissance drones and the Royal Navy’s Type 45 destroyer, which is carrying out NATO missions. For this action, the United Kingdom also dispatched a sensitive attack submarine equipped with a "Tomahawk" cruise missile to the Mediterranean.

    However, the British attack on nuclear submarines is precisely the most controversial equipment in the past two years. On February 10, 2017, the British "The Sun" reported that three ultra-modern attack-class nuclear submarines of the British Royal Navy (worthing 1.2 billion pounds each) had frequent technical problems, and four Trafalgar-class submarines had Can not be used almost. British Navy Admiral Perry said: "The United Kingdom spent $ 1 billion to buy the 45-type destroyer quarreled." British Navy officials even said that the Russian submarines can hear these boats within 100 miles.

    The seven nuclear-powered attack submarines were originally deployed on a trade route that was “threatened by Iran” to cruise and closely watch Russia’s every move in the Atlantic. "The Sun" stated that this is the first time in recent decades that the United Kingdom has not attacked a submarine for the threat to be on standby. Because of fear of wrath from the top, the British Ministry of Defence and even the Defense Minister collectively concealed the matter from the Prime Minister. A British government official revealed, "No truth was said about these scandals."

    The insiders revealed by these British media may be merely hype, and actual performance is the only criterion for testing strength. However, this time, the Mediterranean’s joint strike against Syria has not only been disgraced for the British navy’s “name”. The British "Times" quoted sources as saying on the 16th that the British smart-class nuclear submarine failed to participate in the Syrian military operation because it had to deal with the interception of two Russian "Kilo-class" conventional submarines. In addition, the British submarine also had to evade two Russian frigates and one anti-submarine aircraft.

    Although the submarine tried to avoid being spotted a few days before the air strikes (it seems that the British smart-class nuclear submarine had just been spotted in the eastern Mediterranean), it was unable to get close to the scheduled position and complete the military strike against Syria without success. Sources also revealed that the Russian Navy’s anti-submarine anti-submarine anti-submarine warfare is quite effective, making this alert-class submarine only effective. In the most critical moment, the British nuclear submarine had to call for help from the nearby American allies. Ultimately, the U.S. and P8 anti-submarine aircraft forced the Russian submarine to withdraw. Back to Sohu, see more
    Disclaimer: This article was authored by the author who settled in Sohu. In addition to the official Sohu account, the point of view only represents the author and does not represent Sohu's position.
    Reading (130,000)
    Not interested in complaints
     
  2. tun_dr_m

    tun_dr_m Alfrescian Old Timer

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2008
    Messages:
    2,839
    Likes Received:
    25
    Trophy Points:
    48
    http://www.sohu.com/a/228591109_352347

    [​IMG]
    军机图
    946文章
    8555万总阅读
    查看TA的文章>
    5
    • 分享到

    这次把普京逼急了,俄罗斯或军援叙利亚S-300防空导弹
    2018-04-17 21:01 导弹 /普京 /俄罗斯
    针对美英法联军4.14轰炸,俄罗斯终于做出强势回应。俄罗斯消息报报道,俄方打算帮助叙进一步加强防空力量,包括可能继续早前被破中断的S300防空导弹供应计划(实际上这更是一种军事援助)。此举一出,各方反应精彩纷呈,中断上一次俄叙S300防空导弹军火交易始作俑者以色列反应最激烈。

    [​IMG]

    这一举动让以色列像爬到太阳表面的蚂蚁一样乱窜。全世界都知道以色列有多害怕俄罗斯向叙利亚供应S300,这意味着日后,以色列空军会有更多F16战斗机被叙防空导弹击落,这也意味着以色列空军独霸中东地位遭遇严峻挑战。以色列不着急才怪,于是不管三七二十一就向俄发出警告,千万别越过红线。言外之意就是,不管任何时候俄罗斯向叙供应S300,都将引来以色列不可预测还击。几乎在同一时间,以色列空军再次发起对叙攻击,向俄罗斯大秀肌肉,证明以色列没有开玩笑。

    [​IMG]

    美国反应有点怂。自打美军打算撤军消息一出,剧情就开始让人匪夷所思。截止目前,美方没有对俄进一步加强在叙军事部署做出任何表态,倒是对再次轰炸叙军事基地一事,早早站出来撇清关系,主动申明这次轰炸和美军无关。

    [​IMG]

    接下来,俄罗斯会顺利卖出去S300防空导弹吗?上一次以色列敲打俄罗斯别越过红线后,俄罗斯选择乖乖听话。这一次,俄罗斯会继续乖乖听话还是会完全无视警告?俄媒倾向于相信这次S300防空导弹交易会顺利进行。理由是,上一次在叙部署S300计划中断,系俄对战局无全局把握,怕贸然推进先进防空导弹帮倒忙。这一次,S300防空导弹有且只有一种军事用途,那就是加强叙方防御防空力量,以便应对北约联军不期而至的更多潜在空袭。

    [​IMG]

    同时,俄媒劝告以色列,仗着打遍中东无敌手的军事优势存在,四处横行霸道事是行不通的。如果以色列初心不变,仍旧渴望在应许之地繁衍生息世世代代,就不该继续扮演掠夺和侵略角色,而应该想想静静了。返回搜狐,查看更多

    声明:本文由入驻搜狐号的作者撰写,除搜狐官方账号外,观点仅代表作者本人,不代表搜狐立场。


    Military aircraft map

    946 articles
    85.55 million total reading

    ">View TA's Articles>

    5

    share to

    Putin's urgency this time, Russia or the military aid Syria S-300 air defense missile
    2018-04-17 21:01
    missile
    /
    Putin
    /
    Russia

    In response to the 4.14 bombing of the United States, Britain, and France, Russia finally made a strong response. The Russian News reported that Russia intends to help Syria further strengthen the air defense forces, including the S300 air defense missile supply plan that may continue to be interrupted earlier (in fact, this is more of a kind of military aid). In response to this move, the parties responded brilliantly. Israel’s response to the previous Russian Syrian-S300 anti-aircraft missile arms trade was most fierce.

    This move made Israel scurry like an ant crawling over the surface of the sun. The whole world knows how much Israel fears that Russia will supply S300 to Syria. This means that in the future, more F-16 fighters will be shot down by Syrian air defense missiles. This also means that the Israeli Air Force has to face severe challenges in its dominant position in the Middle East. Israel is not in a hurry to blame. Therefore, regardless of whether it was in 271, it warned Russia not to cross the red line. The implication is that no matter what time Russia supplies Syria to Syria, it will lead Israel to react unpredictably. Almost at the same time, the Israeli air force renewed its attack on Syria and showed its muscles to Russia, demonstrating that Israel was not joking.

    The U. Since the U.S. military intends to withdraw its troops, the story begins to be bizarre. Up to now, the United States has not made any statement about Russia’s further stepping up its military deployment in Syria. Instead, it has reopened the relationship between the military bases and the bombing of Syria, and took the initiative to declare that the bombing had nothing to do with the US military.

    Next, will Russia successfully sell the S300 air defense missile? The last time Israel beat Russia and did not cross the red line, Russia chose to obey. This time, will Russia continue to obey or will completely ignore the warning? Russian media tends to believe that the S300 anti-aircraft missile fair will proceed smoothly. The reason is that the last time the S300 plan was suspended in Syria, Russia had no overall grasp of the war situation and was afraid that rushing forward with advanced anti-aircraft missiles would help. This time, the S300 anti-aircraft missile has one and only one military purpose. That is to strengthen the Syrian defense air defense forces in order to deal with more potential air strikes that the NATO coalition has unexpectedly encountered.

    At the same time, the Russian media has advised Israel to continue its military superiority with the invincible hand in the Middle East. It is impractical to go anywhere with a hegemony. If Israel's original mind remains unchanged and it is still eager to multiply the generations of generations in the promised land, it should not continue to play the role of plunder and aggression, but should think about silence. Back to Sohu, see more
    Disclaimer: This article was authored by the author who settled in Sohu. In addition to the official Sohu account, the point of view only represents the author and does not represent Sohu's position.
     

Share This Page