• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Prosecution turns against its own witness Cecilia Sue

Extremist

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Jun 21, 2012
Messages
2,799
Points
0
In an unexpected move, prosecutors in the sex-for-contracts trial involving former anti-narcotics chief Ng Boon Gay yesterday turned against their own star witness.

Deputy Public Prosecutor Tan Ken Hwee accused former IT sales manager Cecilia Sue of lying, given the wide discrepancies between what she told investigators and what she has said in court. As a result of the turn of events, Ms Sue will be in court for a fifth day today, and will be questioned again by Ng's lawyer, Senior Counsel Tan Chee Meng.

Ms Sue, 36, said in statements to the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) that she and Ng had been lovers between 2009 and late 2010. When she became pregnant, she wondered if the baby might be his.

But under questioning by defence counsel last week, she insisted that there was never any relationship, and said Ng had forced her to perform oral sex on him.
 
hi there


1. hahahaha!
2. this is no some unexpected turn of event.
3. it is scripted!
4. a total waste of taxpayers' monies to fuel such a load of crap.
5. where top dogs play its game!
 
It's turning out into a huge embarrassment for CPIB. However, that Pervert Gay abused his position of power to obtain sexual gratification is without question as per existing laws. What I find amazing is that the prosecution's case seems to rely wholely on her testimony without concrete or even circumstantial evidence to support a case against Pervert Gay for the crime he is being charged with. Even if BJ Queen Sue was playing ball with the prosecution, the prosecution required other evidence to seal their case, they had to show that BJ Queen Sue benefited from her sexual trysts with Pervert Gay and that Pervert Gay assisted her. The prosecution can still win this case provided they have other evidence other than BJ Queen Sue's court testimony.
 
How cum moi hab dis feeling...Ah sisilia is trying 2 save Ah Gay all dis while...:confused:
 
Actually doesn't matter at all, ppl here fail to read that justice here is tampered with a choice to accept whichever statement they wished.

And they would always fall back on the CPIB dogs written statements as truth as the case was built on it.

Or else it would have never proceeded to this stage.

They have already made sure NBG was already guilty cos all they need to believe ( and believe me) was that there were occassions when NBG would have spliied the details about the quotations of whatever to CS.

And who would not believe this possiblites since 'pillow talk' between the two after a orgasmic performance would entail the most intimate details of whatever, be it work or not work related.

The verdict of this case was already sealed before it begun.
 
Last edited:
Brother SCROOBAL, what's your take on the latest turn of events?
 
Actually doesn't matter at all, ppl here fail to read that justice here is tampered with a choice to accept whichever statement they wished.

The verdict of this case was already sealed before it begun.

With Earth's Clay, they did the Last Men's knead
And then of the Last Harvest sow'd the Seeds.
Yea, the First Morning of Creation wrote
What the Last Dawn of Reckoning Shall Read

- Omar Khayyam
 
Last edited:
Now Cecilia need to bring her child for DNA test.
 
Now Cecilia need to bring her child for DNA test.

We need a paternity test tv show from Mediacorp.

[video=youtube;a4dJV0ZPFAU]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a4dJV0ZPFAU[/video]
 
hi there


1. hahahaha!
2. this is no some unexpected turn of event.
3. it is scripted!
4. a total waste of taxpayers' monies to fuel such a load of crap.
5. where top dogs play its game!

1. Muahahahahhahaha !
2. Yes this is expected turn of event.
3. it is NOT scripted!
4. people love to see crap drama.
5. waiting for you to join the top dogs

6...7...8...9....10.... HAHAHAHAH!
 
thanks to cecilia, newspapers are selling like hotcakes for the first time!
 
Deputy Public Prosecutor Tan Ken Hwee accused former IT sales manager Cecilia Sue of lying, given the wide discrepancies between what she told investigators and what she has said in court

Maybe DPP Tan fucking tulan because Cecilia didn't give him a BJ..
 
With Earth's Clay, they did the Last Men's knead
And then of the Last Harvest sow'd the Seeds.
Yea, the First Morning of Creation wrote
What the Last Dawn of Reckoning Shall Read

- Omar Khayyam

Amendment - With Earth's First Clay. .........
 
http://www.asiaone.com/News/Latest+News/Singapore/Story/A1Story20121003-375133.html

Read this and you know LKY, CPIB, MHA and the courts are in contempt of commmonwealth, international practices in law, Singaporeans and of the average intellect of mankind. NBG not even join CNB when CS was marketing for contract and NBG suggest money use for renovation not IT. So if it was sex, it was free sex. CS enjoyed so many times that it cannot be called rape. In fact. NBG was doing national and public service.:D
 
Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned. A jilted lover who thought she could just lie and get NBG sacked ended up having to testify in court instead. And then having to lie again because she didn't want her husband to know about the affair and created another lie.

unexpected turn of events
 
lianbeng noted the hunter became the hunted n the witness became the suspect.:D
 
The presumptive elements of the law is till an issue for NBG. Sex or some form of sex has occurred on a number of occasions which has been acknowledged by both parties but definitions differ.

He was certainly in a position of conflict at the material time. No need to prove influence of tender but taking advantage of a vendor is also an issue.

Its very much up to NBG to say that it is not gratification but an affair of the heart.

I think her statements to PIB will be admiited.

I am sure that he will be convicted but fined for his indescretion. His only hope is VK Rajah of the Appellate Courts who is well known liberal and does not brook onerous laws. But even he is constrained as Courts must follow strictly what Parliament enacted unless he can find a fundamenat flaw or conflict.




Brother SCROOBAL, what's your take on the latest turn of events?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top