PRC wishes to avoid international court over territorial claims in SCS

[Agoraphobic]

PRC would prefer to deal with individual countries one at a time rather than face a panel of them in disputes over territory in SCS. The ball is in their court. However with Japan and US now showing their backing for smaller nations, PRC might have to take them more seriously now.

Cheers!

http://www.scmp.com/news/china/arti...-over-maritime-disputes-says-vietnam-official

News›China

DIPLOMACY

China wants to avoid court over maritime disputes, says Vietnam official

Official claims Beijing made several requests not to take maritime dispute to arbitration

China has repeatedly asked Vietnam not to take the two countries' maritime territorial dispute to an international court, a top Vietnamese military official said yesterday.
Speaking on the sidelines of the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, Deputy Defence Minister Nguyen Chi Vinh said the country had yet to decide when to seek international arbitration but the decision hinged on China's actions in the South China Sea.
"They [China] have asked us several times not to bring the case to international court," Vinh said in comments to Japanese media that were provided to the South China Morning Post.
"Our response was that it's up to China's activities and behaviour; if they continue to push us, we have no choice. This [legal] option is also in accordance with international law."
Vinh's remarks came after Vietnamese Prime Minister Nguyen Tan Dung said that his country had prepared evidence for a legal suit challenging China's claim to waters off the Vietnamese coast and was considering the best time to file it.
Vinh held a bilateral meeting with Wang Guanzhong , deputy chief of general staff of the People's Liberation Party, on Friday in Singapore.
Chinese defence spokesman Yang Yujun said Wang and Vinh "candidly exchanged views" on security issues. But Yang would not confirm whether the issue of international arbitration was raised.
Relations between the long-time ideological allies have nosedived since China parked a state-owned oil rig in disputed waters off Vietnam's coast on May 1. The deployment, which Hanoi has said is a violation of its sovereignty, prompted large-scale anti-China protests in Vietnam.
The episode has also seen Hanoi step up its efforts to galvanise international support for its case.
Vinh said remarks by Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and US Defence Secretary Chuck Hagel at the regional security forum had "great value and significance" in forcing China back to the negotiating table.
The strong remarks from Japan and the US, Vinh added, would also remind Association of Southeast Asian Nations countries that "the rig is not for Vietnam, it's for other countries as well".
China has responded fiercely to speeches by Abe and Hagel, who criticised Beijing for its "unilateral" and "destabilising" behaviour in its surrounding waters.
Additional reporting by Reuters

 

[3_M]

It strange for US to talk about adherence to International Maritime Law when in actual fact they don't even recognize and rectify UNCLOS. No major power US, China, Russia, India far as I know recognize the compulsory jurisdiction of Internationale courts like ICJ or ICC. Why should they have any reason to accept order from another authority ? That a reality.

If it so easy, Japan would have taken Russia to ICJ for the territorial dispute in their northern 4 islands. So there is no question of SCS appearing before International court.

 

[syed putra]

If China goes to ICJ, they may lose Tibet, Taiwan, Xinjiang, outer mongolia, manchuria,............

 

[sochi2014]

Seow Lah they know they will definitely lose one har when they dun have the kangaroo courts in control.

Because the world supports angmos ideals!!