• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

PR continue to own properties after they left.. hv paper general got his facts right?

virus

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Feb 26, 2012
Messages
15,733
Points
83
http://www.theonlinecitizen.com/2014/05/prs-allowed-to-retain-property-after-giving-up-status/


CNA-left.jpg

The CNA report caused much anger among the public, and the removal of the particular part of its report caused confusion.


In full, this is the relevant part of Mr Shanmugam’s speech which you can view here [emphasis ours]:

“Requiring ex-Singapore Citizens and ex-Permanent Residents to dispose of their Restricted Properties

“The final group of key amendments deals with the disposal of Restricted Properties belonging to ex-Singapore citizens and ex-Permanent Residents (PRs), and to foreign persons beneficially entitled to Restricted Properties through inheritance. Our policy is that only foreigners who are PRs and who have been given specific approval under the RPA can own Restricted Properties. Foreign beneficiaries who inherit such properties and Singapore Citizens and PRs who renounce or lose their citizenship or permanent residency, must dispose of their interests in the properties in a timely manner.

“Currently, the executors or administrators have ten years to dispose of the foreign beneficiaries’ interest in a Restricted Property if the beneficiaries do not qualify for approval under the RPA. As the estate administration process has been simplified with the abolishment of estate duty in 2008, we will shorten the disposal period to five years.

“We will now also require individuals who renounce or lose their Singapore Citizenship or Permanent Residency to dispose of their Restricted Properties. The amendment will address the current anomaly in our laws whereby an ex-Singaporean or ex-PR can continue to hold on to their Restricted Properties.”

so who is right? if he anyhow pom, how to believe his words then?
 
Re: PR continue to own properties after they left.. hv paper general got his facts ri

the sign of fumbling PAP is here.

More fumbles = disagreements and soon split into 2.
 
Re: PR continue to own properties after they left.. hv paper general got his facts ri

Another fucking lie.

10407037_10202008177181761_6803607094097430510_n.jpg


 
Re: PR continue to own properties after they left.. hv paper general got his facts ri

I know of a converted citizen from PRC. He stays in a paid up 5-room HDB flat. Owns a private condo for rental income. Invested most of his saving in a relative's business in PRC.

His grand retirement plan: return to china.

Sinkie's gahman is damn gong gong.
 
Re: PR continue to own properties after they left.. hv paper general got his facts ri

I know of a converted citizen from PRC. He stays in a paid up 5-room HDB flat. Owns a private condo for rental income. Invested most of his saving in a relative's business in PRC.

His grand retirement plan: return to china.

Sinkie's gahman is damn gong gong.

The PAPzis are not gong gong. IT is they and their cronies that have enriched themselves by opening up the property market to increase demand and prices. This is an easy way to gather great wealth for a group of men who have very little ingenuity and intelligence. It is Singaporeans who are gong gong to allow such a small group to enrich themselves while suffering the consequences.
 
Re: PR continue to own properties after they left.. hv paper general got his facts ri

Seriously PR can own a property overseas and in Singapore without violating the HDB regulations?
 
Re: PR continue to own properties after they left.. hv paper general got his facts ri

The PAPzis are not gong gong. IT is they and their cronies that have enriched themselves by opening up the property market to increase demand and prices. This is an easy way to gather great wealth for a group of men who have very little ingenuity and intelligence. It is Singaporeans who are gong gong to allow such a small group to enrich themselves while suffering the consequences.

yes in short it is a betraying act. Selling cunt tree to make wealth for themselves.
As to why sinkie are gong gong, this one really no answer can be found till now - that is why I can only relate this to "baris, heads down, ass up , senja tak" all the time.
Having said that, betrayers usually will not have a good ending. ..
 
Last edited:
Back
Top