• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Potent legislation in Obama care - Challenge for PAP to adopt!!!

TopSage

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Feb 13, 2011
Messages
798
Points
0
Why the Republicans so opposed to Obama care when analysis showt
tthat it will reduce the healthcare costs of American society tremendous once the initial costs borne by govt is paid out.

One potent legislation in Obama care is insurance companies
have to pay out 85% of premiums collected. You minus overheads, admin costs and taxes it reduces the profit margin's to a minimum. Insurance companies play an important role to negotiate down the charges paid to hospitals by putting pressure on their margin's, it will suppress the rise of medical costs. By forcing them to payou, insurannce companies will reduce it's costs... spend less on advertising and
has less incentive to pay lawyers who specialise in denying claim.

If you look at all insurance schemes run
by the PAP , a significant portion of the premiums is not paid out but kept by the scheme. This translate to profits for private companies when scheme's like medishield are transferred to them.
So far there is little transparency on the accurial computational if these schemes are design to seek high surplus and profits.

Before medishield is changed to. Medishield Life we must consider
these suggested changes to reduce costs for Singaporeans
 
Back
Top