Positive after 7 days no need to isolate ?

NanoRay

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Aug 30, 2021
Messages
7,294
Points
113
It seems to be the case for fully vaccinated, that on the 7th day of your isolation if you are positive, then as long as you are fully vaccinated, you are released from quarantine. However, if you partially or not vaccinated, then after 14 days, regardless of your test status, you can roam the streets:

Screenshot_2.jpg
 
Does that mean if an unvaccinated is infected, after 14 days he is still alive he can roam the streets. Then why block him from shopping malls and restaurants ? I don't get the logic at all. :rolleyes:

It's about inconveniencing them until some of them say 'fuck it' and join the vaxtard club.

 
Do you think the test kits are trustworthy? :wink:

My point is if it's true a person can be released from isolation even if he is positive, and a positive person is allowed to roam the malls and restaurants, then why discriminate an unvaxxed who is negative ?
 
Does that mean if an unvaccinated is infected, after 14 days he is still alive he can roam the streets. Then why block him from shopping malls and restaurants ? I don't get the logic at all. :rolleyes:
Imuho it is just a form of punishment to the unvac as pap knows sinkies are tam jiak + ter nao :sneaky:
 
I think we all know that the objective is to inconvenience the unvaccinated. The problem is as Govt they need to be able justify, and it looks like they have run out of explanations. I would have more respect for them if they come clean and say : "Okay, we are just trying to inconvenience the unvaccinated."
 
Does that mean if an unvaccinated is infected, after 14 days he is still alive he can roam the streets. Then why block him from shopping malls and restaurants ? I don't get the logic at all. :rolleyes:
It's revenge for not taking their prescribed poison.
 
Does that mean if an unvaccinated is infected, after 14 days he is still alive he can roam the streets. Then why block him from shopping malls and restaurants ? I don't get the logic at all. :rolleyes:
You expect logic from PAP? Tan Gu Gu.
 
Does that mean if an unvaccinated is infected, after 14 days he is still alive he can roam the streets. Then why block him from shopping malls and restaurants ? I don't get the logic at all. :rolleyes:
thats y most ordinary citizens are angry and frustrated with their garbermen. the vaccination rules forced onto the people totally go against common sense
, safe medical practice. it totally disregard the serious side effects of the vaccine.
It is safe to say that more than 90% of those infected in the past few weeks are either fully vaxxed or vaxxed twice , which proved beyond doubt that vaccine
is not effective. yet garbermen staunchly insisted that everyone must take the third jab. this is another illogical mandate.
 
My point is if it's true a person can be released from isolation even if he is positive, and a positive person is allowed to roam the malls and restaurants, then why discriminate an unvaxxed who is negative ?
Positive doesn't mean infectious. The probability of infecting someone 7 days after you first tested positive (and provided you no longer have symptoms) is as low as anyone on the streets.
 
lets observe a minute's silence for sporeans who were jailed for circuit breaker 'offences' or whatever fuck shit you call those useless measures.
i remember one guy went to buy bakuteh kena jailed. how fucking ridiculous is that? really iwan
 
Do you think the test kits are trustworthy? :wink:

ART kits err on the careful side. You need to have a specific amount of virus load to be positive. Therefore, if you're negative, you could be positive but if you're positive, you're sure as fuck positive.
 
Positive doesn't mean infectious. The probability of infecting someone 7 days after you first tested positive (and provided you no longer have symptoms) is as low as anyone on the streets.

Someone I know, her child was still positive after 7 days. Partially vaccinated. School told her to send her kids back to school after 7 days and she did. 1/3 of the class in isolation now :roflmao:
 
Someone I know, her child was still positive after 7 days. Partially vaccinated. School told her to send her kids back to school after 7 days and she did. 1/3 of the class in isolation now :roflmao:
School indeed set their own “extra layer”. The MC is just five days. So parents are asked to take pic of positive ART results to justify absence beyond the 5 days MC. Bloody hell. MOH rule: you are released after 12 noon on day 7 without need of ART tests, provided you feel well and not showing symptoms
 
Someone I know, her child was still positive after 7 days. Partially vaccinated. School told her to send her kids back to school after 7 days and she did. 1/3 of the class in isolation now :roflmao:

OYK must have signed a "Ceasefire Agreement" with the Commander-in-Chief of the Corona Virus Army that the virus will not spread after "jun jun" 7 days for the vaccinated and 14 days for the partially vaccinated or unvaccinated, and "jun jun" at 12 pm they will ceasefire and stop infecting.
 
Someone I know, her child was still positive after 7 days. Partially vaccinated. School told her to send her kids back to school after 7 days and she did. 1/3 of the class in isolation now :roflmao:

Hope the brats enjoy constant mask wearing and incessant 'remote learning' sessions, in the not too distant future you will see a bunch of mentally retarded kids whose skills at face-to-face social interaction would have been crippled during their most formative years. Your kids, your problem. :cool:

https://www.aier.org/article/masking-children-tragic-unscientific-and-damaging/
 
Back
Top