Serious Please Guess Why Incredible India Reject RCEP - World Largest Trade Body

Pinkieslut

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Apr 14, 2011
Messages
18,942
Points
113
India opts out of RCEP for now but to continue negotiating over differences
PM Narendra Modi said India will not join RCEP. He said his decision was guided by the impact the RCEP would have on the livelihood of all Indians.
Nayanima Basu4 November, 2019
India opts out of RCEP for now but to continue negotiating over...
Prime Minister Narendra Modi in Bangkok | ANI
Prime Minister Narendra Modi in Bangkok | ANI
Text Size:
New Delhi: After days and months of suspense, India Monday said it would not join the ASEAN-led mega trade deal Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) even as the member countries decided to address New Delhi’s concerns and bring it on board by next year.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi made the announcement in Bangkok during his speech at the third RCEP Summit, which was attended by leaders of all the member countries.
“India conveyed its decision at the summit not to join the RCEP agreement. This reflects both our assessment that current global situation as well as fairness and balance of the agreement, India had significant issues of core interest that remained unresolved,” said Secretary (East), Ministry of External Affairs, Vijay Thakur Singh.
The RCEP is being negotiated between 16 countries, that includes the 10 ASEAN members — Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam — and their six trade partners — Australia, China, Japan, South Korea, New Zealand and India, which has now opted out.
At the summit, Modi said his decision was guided by the impact the RCEP would have on the “lives and livelihood of all Indians, especially vulnerable sections of the society”.
“In the given circumstances, we believe that not joining the agreement is the right decision for India…We took the right decision in national interest,” secretary Singh said.
While all the 15 countries have concluded their negotiations, it is only India that failed to finalise the talks despite “serious efforts” made by all member countries, sources told ThePrint.
Sources also indicated that the main reason why the talks fell apart was because India could not make significant progress in trade in services under the proposed pact. This means, India could not negotiate its access for its professionals such as engineers, doctors, journalists and IT employees to the markets of the member countries.
According to sources, other reasons behind the negotiations falling apart are — inadequate protection against import surge, differences over tariff structure with China on goods, possible circumvention of rules of origin, keeping the base year as 2014, and no credible assurances on market access and non-tariff barriers.
India has been facing stiff opposition from its industries and the farming community over the RCEP, mainly due to China and the over $60 billion trade deficit that New Delhi has with Beijing.
Countries to ‘work together’ to bring India on board
Meanwhile, leaders of all the participating countries stated that they would “work together” to resolve India’s concerns.
“India has significant outstanding issues, which remain unresolved. All RCEP participating countries will work together to resolve these outstanding issues in a mutually satisfactory way. India’s final decision will depend on satisfactory resolution of these issues,” the statement said.
The statement also mentioned that the 15 countries have concluded text-based negotiations for all the 20 major chapters that deal with market access issues. The negotiations will now undergo legal scrutiny by each of the countries in order for them to sign the agreement next year.
Earlier in the day, Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Le Yucheng said 15 countries decided to move ahead first.
“The text-based negotiations have been completed and issues of market access have been essentially concluded,” he said. “Whenever India is ready, they are welcome to come on board,” he added.
This is the reason why the 15 countries did not sign the deal Monday and decided to wait until 2020, sources said.
Also read: India will not join RCEP trade deal, my conscience won’t allow it, says PM Modi
New Delhi’s decision has upset Tokyo
It was Japan that had brought India on board the RCEP talks way back in 2012 when the negotiations for the deal began. At that time, China, which continues to remain the main driver in the deal, wanted to have the trade partnership with the ASEAN countries and Japan only.
The talks were begun by Beijing as Asia’s answer to US-led mega trade pact known as Trans-Pacific Partnership, which was later dumped by US President Donald Trump.
New Delhi’s decision to not join the RCEP has upset Tokyo much more than any other member country, according to a source.
The issue was also discussed during the bilateral meeting between Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and Modi which took place before the RCEP summit.
Both leaders are expected to discuss it later this year again when Abe comes to India for the India-Japan annual summit.
 
India is loyal friend. Want to retain advantages exclusively enjoyed by Singapore. :thumbsup:
 
2018 Article (from India)

What India stands to gain from RCEP negotiations (Or want to GAIN)

India has a whopping $104 billion trade deficit with the 16-member Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) grouping, which is 64% of India’s total trade deficit of 2017-18. No wonder, there is a raging debate on whether India should remain or quit the RCEP negotiations. RCEP comprises the 10-member Asean grouping and its six free trade partners, including China, India, Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand. Once concluded, RCEP will create the largest regional trading bloc, making up 25% of GDP, 30% of global trade, and 26% of foreign direct investment (FDI) flows.
Negotiations have dragged on for almost five years, primarily because of India’s reluctance to significantly open up its market, given the sensitivities around agriculture- and labour-intensive domestic industries. On 31 August, at the Singapore Ministerial, RCEP members, however, staged a coup of sorts by adopting a “package of year-end deliverables", for which negotiations need to be concluded by December. Given that member countries, India and Indonesia, are going to polls early next year, sealing the negotiations will ensure that the deal will be signed sometime next year. India claimed “big success" as members conceded to its demand to liberalize their services market and allow movement of skilled professionals (Mode 4).



However, former trade secretary Rajeev Kher said India should not overplay the Mode 4 card as the geopolitical situation has made it difficult for countries to negotiate easier immigration norms. “India should focus on skilling its manpower as the aging countries of Asia would anyway need skilled professionals from India because of its demographic advantage."
 
2018 Straits Times

Trade ministers of the 16 countries met last week in Singapore to push forward the complex negotiations that would create the world's largest trading bloc, covering one-third of the world's gross domestic product and a quarter of its exports.
RCEP negotiations have been going on for six years and there have been 23 rounds of talks so far.
Speculation was rife that India would leave the negotiations, following the setting up of a ministerial committee to look into reservations that the country has on the trade agreement amid opposition by sections within the government and the industry.


The talks have also come into focus against the backdrop of growing protectionism in the United States and the eruption of trade wars, with the US hiking tariffs on aluminium and steel affecting China and other countries.

Yet Indian sensitivities in negotiations revolve around China. The Indian industry is fearful that decreasing tariffs for China would lead to Chinese goods flooding the Indian market and widening a trade deficit.
India's trade deficit with China was US$51 billion (S$70.1 billion) in 2016-17 in favour of China, which does not have an FTA with India.
Another area of concern is ensuring easier movement of Indian skilled workers in the RCEP countries and greater access to local job markets.
A Commerce Ministry official said that much more ground must be covered on RCEP but noted progress had been made in Singapore. He said that India now has a lot of room to handle China.
"It was agreed (during the talks) to give large flexibilities for countries," the official said.
These include an understanding that countries with no FTA with each other - like India and China - could negotiate tariffs bilaterally within a certain range.
Mr Prabhu also said that there had been progress in India's efforts to push for linking of services and goods negotiations.
"We have been emphasising on the inevitable linkage between services and goods negotiations, because RCEP is not a goods agreement alone, and services must be an integral part of the agreement. The linkage has been finally accepted," said the Commerce Minister.

India is weak in goods but strong in services, and has been arguing that talks on services, which means movement of its professionals, should be given equal importance as the goods negotiations.
Still, concerns remain among the countries involved in the RCEP that upcoming elections in India and Indonesia could impact the pace of the talks.
Analysts said that India would benefit from RCEP but the signing of the final draft would take a political call.
"RCEP is of considerable importance for the success of India's Act East policy," noted former Indian diplomat Rajiv Bhatia, distinguished fellow at think-tank Gateway House.
"There are serious concerns on a number of issues. One of the major things has been how to open up to China and others. I think uncertainty still remains (for India)."
 
2018 Article (from India)

What India stands to gain from RCEP negotiations (Or want to GAIN)


India has a whopping $104 billion trade deficit with the 16-member Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) grouping, which is 64% of India’s total trade deficit of 2017-18. No wonder, there is a raging debate on whether India should remain or quit the RCEP negotiations. RCEP comprises the 10-member Asean grouping and its six free trade partners, including China, India, Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand. Once concluded, RCEP will create the largest regional trading bloc, making up 25% of GDP, 30% of global trade, and 26% of foreign direct investment (FDI) flows.
Negotiations have dragged on for almost five years, primarily because of India’s reluctance to significantly open up its market, given the sensitivities around agriculture- and labour-intensive domestic industries. On 31 August, at the Singapore Ministerial, RCEP members, however, staged a coup of sorts by adopting a “package of year-end deliverables", for which negotiations need to be concluded by December. Given that member countries, India and Indonesia, are going to polls early next year, sealing the negotiations will ensure that the deal will be signed sometime next year. India claimed “big success" as members conceded to its demand to liberalize their services market and allow movement of skilled professionals (Mode 4).



However, former trade secretary Rajeev Kher said India should not overplay the Mode 4 card as the geopolitical situation has made it difficult for countries to negotiate easier immigration norms. “India should focus on skilling its manpower as the aging countries of Asia would anyway need skilled professionals from India because of its demographic advantage."
Someone should just detonate a super nuclear bomb and wipe off these smelly people from the face of the earth. :D
 
Indians didn't grab a good deal with other nations. That's why India rejected it.

Whereas Singapore government think that they are real business man, thinking that they can make a splash in India market. But we got played out all the time.
 
At least Modi is looking out for the interests of his people. Can't say the same for the leaders of some other countries. :wink:
 
Hey so will there be RECIProcity in the RCEP?

i.e. I can go to Japan as a pasta maker and date JAV starlets?
 
CEACA HAS NO IMPACT WHATSOEVER ON US????☻☻☻
Mouldy's BJP party has been losing support over time. And FTAs have only benefitted their corrupt government and the few useless "talents" .. so the best move for him to do is fall back to building infrastructure and develop manufacturing

But then again .. the British raj has left them 2 presents that guarantees they will fail at economic development: the land act and labour law. And this is before we are talking about their social issues like the sectarianism , illiteracy and overpopulation.

The whole world knows to stay away from India until they sort out their own problems.. except Pap
 
Mouldy's BJP party has been losing support over time. And FTAs have only benefitted their corrupt government and the few useless "talents" .. so the best move for him to do is fall back to building infrastructure and develop manufacturing

But then again .. the British raj has left them 2 presents that guarantees they will fail at economic development: the land act and labour law. And this is before we are talking about their social issues like the sectarianism , illiteracy and overpopulation.

The whole world knows to stay away from India until they sort out their own problems.. except Pap
Yes, the whole world knows that EXCEPT PAP. India itself is a shot hole.
 
Modi want free movements of labor and Singapore agreed to it. Ramesh is a product of India shit hole.
 
CEACA HAS NO IMPACT WHATSOEVER ON US????☻☻☻

On the contrary, CECA has made more PMET jobless and pushed average Singaporean to the bottom of the food chain while can-talk-cannot-deliver-fake-degree earn big bucks and spit on Singaporeans.
 
Back
Top