Plastic Justice

[Confuseous]

After a speeding vehicle is detected, traffic police systems issue a summons to the owner of the vehicle. This creates a correspondence between the owner of the vehicle as well as the traffic police. In this case, the owner of the car would be Dr Wu. The Traffic Police should not be accepting information from anyone on the case other than the owner of the vehicle as they have no standing in the case. Therefore, information provided to the police on the case might be regarded as having been provided via Dr Wu. If this interpretation is correct, Dr Wu should be held responsible for both providing false information to the police and abetting Mr Kuan to assert the veracity of that false information. This would have implications for the proper sentence.As a matter of public interest, the Traffic Police and AGC are requested to provide clarification on this question of interpretation.

I will take the Minister at his word that it was not the case that Wu was spared a jail sentence because he’s rich.

- http://convexset.blogspot.sg/2012/06/plastic-justice.html