Parents further distraught by MediShield exclusion letter

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Jul 24, 2008
Messages
33,627
Points
0
<TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%"><TBODY><TR>Parents further distraught by MediShield exclusion letter
</TR><!-- headline one : end --><!-- show image if available --></TBODY></TABLE>




<!-- START OF : div id="storytext"--><!-- more than 4 paragraphs -->MY FIRST child was born with suspected cysts in her lungs, according to the paediatrician and the paediatric surgeon who monitored her. At the same time, my wife and I were told that new laws offered MediShield coverage for babies like mine.
We duly filled the requisite forms for coverage and expected possible exclusions for my daughter's condition. Two months later, the Central Provident Fund (CPF) Board denied our daughter MediShield coverage, citing the higher insurance risk posed by her pre-existing health condition.
We were flabbergasted, given the promise from the Health Ministry that every Singaporean will enjoy basic MediShield coverage unless he or she chooses to opt out.
The least we expected was basic MediShield coverage, with an exclusion for our daughter's pre-existing condition. In fact, we were even prepared to pay higher premiums.
All parents want healthy babies. Having a baby born with some health complications is a tormenting experience, be it financially or mentally.
While the CPF Board suggested that we reapply pending treatment and confirmation of our daughter's condition, the bluntness of its reply was cold comfort and the last thing we expected as first-time parents burdened by the anxiety of our daughter's condition, which was diagnosed during pregnancy.
Leslie Ong
 
<TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 width="100%"><TBODY><TR><TD class=heading>Latest comments</TD></TR><TR><TD id=messageDisplayRegion width="100%"><TABLE style="WIDTH: 100%" cellSpacing=2 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left><TABLE style="WIDTH: 100%" cellSpacing=2 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left><TABLE style="WIDTH: 100%" class=Post cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left>There should be coverage no matter what even if the premier had to be higher.
No one should be denial of medical benefits.

I understand rules and regulation had to be followed, but there should be some flexibility and
review when exceptional cases happened.

It is sad to know that this is happening where people had become so stiff and
inhumane.
</TD></TR><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left>Posted by: cheap3877 at Wed Sep 02 13:41:20 SGT 2009
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left><TABLE style="WIDTH: 100%" cellSpacing=2 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left><TABLE style="WIDTH: 100%" class=AlternatePost cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left>This is disgusting – with all the BILLIONS of dollars made by Temasek and GIC, you would expect the government to at least take care of its CITIZENS properly.

Why would MediShield and CPF just refuse to provide any medical coverage to this Singaporean citizen baby, because of something the parents have no control over?

Now that MediShield and CPF do not want to protect this Singaporean citizen, it is a very likely possibility that the Singaporean parents and family will face financial hardships because of their baby’s spiraling medical costs. And all this while being a CITIZEN in one of the richest countries in the world.

Well done men in white, yet another successful effort in making your own citizens feel second class.
</TD></TR><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left>Posted by: nicholas_lah at Wed Sep 02 10:30:24 SGT 2009
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left><TABLE style="WIDTH: 100%" cellSpacing=2 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left><TABLE style="WIDTH: 100%" class=Post cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left>I totally am on the side of Mr Ong. Everyone wants a healthy baby and CPF should be decent enough to respond empathetically instead of the usual letter and official words. So much for "civil servants" - not civil and not servant!
</TD></TR><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left>Posted by: lisalimbf at Wed Sep 02 08:56:29 SGT 2009
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left><TABLE style="WIDTH: 100%" cellSpacing=2 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left><TABLE style="WIDTH: 100%" class=AlternatePost cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left>Government runs like company looking at P&L.
</TD></TR><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left>Posted by: theinlim at Wed Sep 02 08:46:38 SGT 2009
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left><TABLE style="WIDTH: 100%" cellSpacing=2 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left><TABLE style="WIDTH: 100%" class=Post cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0><TBODY><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left>Another reason why Singaporeans do not have children. While we do not expect handouts from the govt, even simple entitlements are such as medical coverage remain unfulfilled.
</TD></TR><TR><TD style="VERTICAL-ALIGN: top" align=left>Posted by: HC027 at Wed Sep 02 07:47:46 SGT 2009
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
 
Back
Top