• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Chitchat Oppie Throws Pebbles From Moving Car To Damage Other Cars! Guess His Caste!

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
as-pebbles-19.jpg


SINGAPORE - A 61-year-old man allegedly threw pebbles out of his moving vehicle, causing damage to two stationary cars.

as-pebbles4-19.jpg


as-pebbles5-19.jpg


On Saturday (Nov 18), the suspect was arrested after the police established his identity.

Officers found a bag of pebbles in his vehicle. The Straits Times understands that the man drives a taxi.

In a statement on Sunday, the police said they received reports from the two vehicle owners between 10pm and 11.20pm on Nov 16, stating that their rear windscreens had shattered.

Their cars had been parked in Foch Road and Desker Road.

Officers conducted on-scene investigations and ground enquiries, and managed to establish the identity of the suspect.

He was arrested in Hougang Avenue 3 at 2.20am on Saturday.

Preliminary investigations revealed that he had also tossed pebbles out of his vehicle on several other occasions.


Investigations are ongoing.

Any person found guilty of committing a rash act which endangers the life or personal safety of others under Section 336(a) of the Penal Code, Chapter 224 faces up to six months' jail and/or a fine of up to $2,500.

http://www.straitstimes.com/singapo...sing-pebbles-from-moving-taxi-shattering-rear
 

glockman

Old Fart
Asset
Officers conducted on-scene investigations and ground enquiries, and managed to establish the identity of the suspect.
Aiyah, they reviewed CCTV footage. No need for highfalutin terms like on-scene investigations, ground enquiries
 

virus

Alfrescian
Loyal
Aiyah, they reviewed CCTV footage. No need for highfalutin terms like on-scene investigations, ground enquiries
How come mata no review CCTV cameras n void deck at yistana? Those farkers still on loose rite?
 

sweetiepie

Alfrescian
Loyal
Aiyah, they reviewed CCTV footage. No need for highfalutin terms like on-scene investigations, ground enquiries
my uncle say he watched crime watch episode 9 tresspassing , the IO solve a simple hdb tresspassing cum robbery case by using the cctv and say until use high tech and forensic also. He say his son know how to solve the case also.
 
Top