- Joined
- Jul 24, 2008
- Messages
- 33,627
- Points
- 0
<TABLE id=msgUN cellSpacing=3 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD id=msgUNsubj vAlign=top> Coffeeshop Chit Chat - On The Advice Of Cabinet</TD><TD id=msgunetc noWrap align=right> </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><TABLE class=msgtable cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="96%"><TBODY><TR><TD class=msg vAlign=top><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR class=msghead><TD class=msgbfr1 width="1%"> </TD><TD><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 border=0><TBODY><TR class=msghead vAlign=top><TD class=msgF noWrap align=right width="1%">From: </TD><TD class=msgFname noWrap width="68%">Roboxxxxx <NOBR></NOBR> </TD><TD class=msgDate noWrap align=right width="30%">Jun-10 10:51 pm </TD></TR><TR class=msghead><TD class=msgT noWrap align=right width="1%" height=20>To: </TD><TD class=msgTname noWrap width="68%">ALL <NOBR></NOBR></TD><TD class=msgNum noWrap align=right> (1 of 23) </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR><TR><TD class=msgleft width="1%" rowSpan=4> </TD><TD class=wintiny noWrap align=right>52507.1 </TD></TR><TR><TD height=8></TD></TR><TR><TD class=msgtxt id=msgtxt_1>Latest from CNA:
http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/1134471/1/.html
http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/1134471/1/.html
"On all other matters, under the Constitution the President must act in accordance with the advice of the Cabinet."
[Endquote]
There are historical roots for this thing called "on advice of the cabinet", and incidentally this is only now coming into focus thanks to the anti-death penalty campaign. "On advice of the cabinet" has its roots in England after the abolishment of absolute monarchy there to be replaced by a constitutional monarchy - the Singapore Head of State plays most of the same roles as the British constitutional monarch.
But the reason that the head of state accedes to any cabinet decision - ie rubber stamps any cabinet decisions or, more officially, "acts on advice of the cabinet" - is really to accede to the people's wishes. That's because - in theory - in a true democracy, the cabinet is formed from members of the winning party/coalition in free and fair elections in accordance with the people's wishes.
But can we actually say that, in Singapore, any elections are free and fair? And if they are not, can anyone elected under such unfree and unfair conditions be said to represent the people's wishes?
If elections are in Singapore are never free and fair, can the President rubber stamping cabinet decisions - "on the advice of cabinet" - which applies only to true democracies, similarly apply to Singapore?
<HR SIZE=1>Edited 6/11/2011 1:54 am ET by Roboxxxxx</TD></TR><TR><TD> </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=msgleft width="1%"> </TD><TD class=msgopt noWrap width="24%">Options</TD><TD class=msgrde noWrap align=middle width="50%">
Reply</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>