• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

old chilldren with young children and old parents= no time no money

tanwahtiu

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Dec 17, 2009
Messages
37,095
Points
113
McDonald kids party children, Gen X &Y, are facing hard time .....


Families paying the price of a new financial order

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/national/fami...ncial-order-20140517-38gon.html#ixzz321ijTSX0


Life just got a little squeezier for people in middle age. Already wedged between the demands of paid work, dependent children and ageing parents, changes forecast by this week's federal budget have forced them firmly into the ''heavy lifting'' corner.

With educational expenses set to increase, the kids are likely to stay in the family home longer. At the same time, support for their elderly parents has been whittled down. They'll be paying more to see a doctor and more to fill up the car while their family tax benefits diminish. Oh, and if they happen to be born after 1965, they will be working until they're 70 before they can get the age pension.

There is no respite for generation squeeze, with pressures simply mounting for people in their 40s and 50s, and women generally doing the heaviest lifting of all, according to Graeme Hugo, director of the Australian Population and Migration Research Centre at the University of Adelaide.

''The load falls disproportionately on these women who straddle the younger baby boomers and the older Gen X-ers,'' he said. ''They have multiple demands on them.''



His observation is supported by the findings from the Australian Work and Life Index, compiled by the University of South Australia's Centre for Work + Life.

Women aged 35 to 44 have the worst work-life balance, but those who are carers for both children and others fare worst of all.

Sara Charlesworth, associate professor at the Centre for Work + Life, said this group was already pushed to the limit with changes flagged in the budget expected to weigh heavily.

''These people are always rushed and pressed for time because they are juggling multiple responsibilities,'' she said.

''That affects their capacity for social interaction, relaxation, exercise. All that gets pushed aside.

''Now we have government policy which is withdrawing financial support at the same time as it's creating an extra care burden for families who will be expected to absorb that.''

Stephanie Cunio, who with her partner Andrew Scarborough has three children aged between four and 11, knows what it's like to juggle multiple responsibilities.

The Sydney couple provide much of the care for Ms Cunio's 84-year-old mother, who is in an aged-care hostel


Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/national/fami...ncial-order-20140517-38gon.html#ixzz321iD2v7U
 
If the Aussies knew that this government would increase the retirement age to 70, they would not have voted them in. Never trust the right-wingers.
 
McDonald kids party children, Gen X &Y, are facing hard time .....


Families paying the price of a new financial order

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/national/fami...ncial-order-20140517-38gon.html#ixzz321ijTSX0


Life just got a little squeezier for people in middle age. Already wedged between the demands of paid work, dependent children and ageing parents, changes forecast by this week's federal budget have forced them firmly into the ''heavy lifting'' corner.

With educational expenses set to increase, the kids are likely to stay in the family home longer. At the same time, support for their elderly parents has been whittled down. They'll be paying more to see a doctor and more to fill up the car while their family tax benefits diminish. Oh, and if they happen to be born after 1965, they will be working until they're 70 before they can get the age pension.

There is no respite for generation squeeze, with pressures simply mounting for people in their 40s and 50s, and women generally doing the heaviest lifting of all, according to Graeme Hugo, director of the Australian Population and Migration Research Centre at the University of Adelaide.

''The load falls disproportionately on these women who straddle the younger baby boomers and the older Gen X-ers,'' he said. ''They have multiple demands on them.''



His observation is supported by the findings from the Australian Work and Life Index, compiled by the University of South Australia's Centre for Work + Life.

Women aged 35 to 44 have the worst work-life balance, but those who are carers for both children and others fare worst of all.

Sara Charlesworth, associate professor at the Centre for Work + Life, said this group was already pushed to the limit with changes flagged in the budget expected to weigh heavily.

''These people are always rushed and pressed for time because they are juggling multiple responsibilities,'' she said.

''That affects their capacity for social interaction, relaxation, exercise. All that gets pushed aside.

''Now we have government policy which is withdrawing financial support at the same time as it's creating an extra care burden for families who will be expected to absorb that.''

Stephanie Cunio, who with her partner Andrew Scarborough has three children aged between four and 11, knows what it's like to juggle multiple responsibilities.

The Sydney couple provide much of the care for Ms Cunio's 84-year-old mother, who is in an aged-care hostel


Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/national/fami...ncial-order-20140517-38gon.html#ixzz321iD2v7U

It's the same in Singapore too.
Unless the parents has make good financial planning earlier. The burden is going to fall on their children.

My thought is quite a number of baby boomer in Singapore are also now in their late 40s and 50s. With aged parents to look after, it's the old looking after the old.
 
advanced medical and health science has cause old children more burden to take care old parents. It is a sad situation.

Baby boomers are those born from 1946-1964 and 1 billion of them worldwide. Those 1964 are now 50 y.o today.

The world need a WW3 soon.




It's the same in Singapore too.
Unless the parents has make good financial planning earlier. The burden is going to fall on their children.

My thought is quite a number of baby boomer in Singapore are also now in their late 40s and 50s. With aged parents to look after, it's the old looking after the old.
 
advanced medical and health science has cause old children more burden to take care old parents. It is a sad situation.

Baby boomers are those born from 1946-1964 and 1 billion of them worldwide. Those 1964 are now 50 y.o today.

The world need a WW3 soon.

Do you think longevity is a curse?
 
advanced medical and health science has cause old children more burden to take care old parents. It is a sad situation.

Baby boomers are those born from 1946-1964 and 1 billion of them worldwide. Those 1964 are now 50 y.o today.

The world need a WW3 soon.

no need la.the sar will come back
 
If the Aussies knew that this government would increase the retirement age to 70, they would not have voted them in. Never trust the right-wingers.

nonono. listen to the sinkie quitters in aussie!!! nazis are the best!! labor party just make every1 lazy wor!!

sinkie in aussie: "we must import PAP into aussie to save it!!!"
 
Back
Top