-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Number of new HDB flats built over 20 years
- Thread starter theDoors
- Start date
Why prices of new HDB flats shot up so much
Is it a surprise that prices of new HDB flats shot up so much?
MBT is responsible for this... :oIo::oIo::oIo:
using singaporean babies cohort size as a guesstimation, the 70s/80s cohort is 36,000 there abouts , they marry within the same age group, and 30% remain single, (36000 x 0.7)/2, at least 12,000 should be built a year...
from 2001-2005, 55,000 flats were built, which corresponds to the 70s/80s cohort size
from 2006-2010, 26,319 flats were built, which is grossly inadequate to supply born and bred Singaporeans
HDB is under building for the years 2006-2010, for born and bred singaporeans
from 2001-2005, 55,000 flats were built, which corresponds to the 70s/80s cohort size
from 2006-2010, 26,319 flats were built, which is grossly inadequate to supply born and bred Singaporeans
HDB is under building for the years 2006-2010, for born and bred singaporeans
www.fuckwarezone.com.sg - View Single Post - Look at how Mah Bow Tan dramatically scaled down the flat supply from 2001 to 2010
WTFFFFF
SINGAPORE - Immigration statistics revealed by the Government for the first time showed that, between 2007 and last year, the majority of those granted citizenship and permanent residence were not economically active - with the number of dependents outstripping working individuals.
During this period, there were 259,040 new permanent residents (PRs) and 92,310 new citizens. Working individuals accounted for 48 per cent of the new PRs and 38 per cent of the new citizens.
TODAYonline | Singapore | Many new PRs, citizens young, well-qualified
where got enough flats........ so many new citizens knnccb
The underlying reason is that they don't understand or they have forgotten the purpose/objective of government, which is to try and make the lives of ordinary people better.
"Lives of people" will suffice, imo. Governance should not be reduced to a zero-sum game. The rich are not my enemies.
don't include "ordinary" and they will point out how well they treat their family members.
"papa is such a ...................", oh, never mind.
No way a well trained engineer like Minister Mah Bow tan can make such stupid mistake,when he knows well that Ah Lao & PM son and holy Goh were all looking at 6 million plus,the real reason must be very interesting,now that some bright sparks has pointed this out,our Cyber investigation team should be on their way by now,the real reason should be out soon,good luck,ex-Minister Mah Bow Tan.
Population increased whereas supply of flats decreased between 2006 to 2010. 1st Class Gabernment!:oIo:
Excellent chart. But I would like to add that PR accepted/rejected is another red herring. Net migration would be a better indicator of how strained current infrastructure and housing have become. S-pass, F-pass or whatever-pass holders also need roofs over their heads.
employment pass holders can't buy flats
They still need to rent a place to sleep. Can you guess where?
