No end in sight to U.S. economic crisis

Watchman

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Mar 12, 2009
Messages
13,160
Points
0
No end in sight to U.S. economic crisis as
'scariest jobs chart ever' shows post-recession
unemployment is at its worst since World War Two


By Daily Mail Reporter
Last updated at 2:09 PM on 6th December 2010

As unemployment in the U.S. nears the dreaded 10 per cent mark, it is a chart to chill the bones of any job hunter.

Comparing previous recoveries from all 10 American recessions since 1948 to the current financial crisis, the stark figures show almost no improvement in employment figures in the past year.

Some commentators have described the comparison as 'the scariest jobs chart ever', pointing to the fact that only the 2001 recession took longer to bring employment back to pre-crisis levels.

article-1336078-0C5E2E4A000005DC-349_468x336.jpg


Number of months after peak employment

Even then, the total percentage of jobs lost bottomed out at two per cent, compared with six per cent this time round.


More...
Clinton promises her own leak after playing host to celebrities
Senate vote kills off two separate bids to extend tax cuts for 'average' Americans


The job chart will heap further pressure on Barack Obama's attempt to stimulate the economy as plans were drawn for a temporary extension of the Bush-era tax rates for all taxpayers.

The bipartisan economic package would also extend jobless benefits for millions of Americans.

Differences remained over details, including White House demands for middle and low-income tax credits.

But Republicans and Democrats appeared to come together yesterday, raising the possibility of a deal in Congress by the end of the week.

Some Democrats continued to object to extending current reduced tax rates for high earners.

The action is needed to prevent the delivery of a tax hike to all taxpayers at the end of the year when the current rates expire and revert to higher pre-2001 and 2003 levels.

article-1336078-0C4F8CAF000005DC-654_468x286.jpg


Worrying times: Unemployed people queue for a jobs fair at the Los Angeles Convention Centre as politicians debate whether to extend benefits in the new year

Negotiations between the Obama administration and a bipartisan group of lawmakers centered on a two-year extension of current rates.

The 9.8 per cent unemployment rate has also heaped pressure on Republicans to accede to President Obama's demand that Congress extend jobless benefits for a year.

Republican congressional leaders had opposed an extension of benefits without cuts elsewhere in the federal budget.

'I think most folks believe the recipe would include at least an extension of unemployment benefits for those who are unemployed and an extension of all of the tax rates for all Americans for some period of time,' said Senator Jon Kyl, the Senate's Republican negotiator in the talks.

'Without unemployment benefits being extended, personally, this is a nonstarter,' said Senator Dick Durbin, the second-ranking member of the Senate Democratic leadership.

Republicans have insisted that any extension of jobless aid be paid for with cuts elsewhere in the federal budget.


article-1336078-0C593BEB000005DC-771_468x335.jpg


Demands: Barack Obama wants lawmakers to extend unemployment benefits for millions

The White House opposes that, saying such cuts are economically damaging during a weak recovery.

About 2m unemployed workers will run out of benefits this month if they are not renewed, and the administration estimates 7m will be affected if the payments are not extended for a year.

Any deal would require the approval of the House and Senate, and the president's signature.

President Obama told Democratic congressional leaders that he would oppose any extension of tax rates that did not include jobless benefits and other assistance his administration was seeking.

The short-term tax and spending debate is unfolding even as Congress and the Obama administration confront growing anxieties over the federal government's growing deficits.

A presidential commission studying the deficit identified austere measures last week to cut $4 trillion from the federal budget over the next decade.
 
The most important thing is what happens in mid-2011, when the Fed’s QE 2 wears off. The markets will look to the Fed to tell them what the next move will be. The Fed will have to say, ‘We’re going to have to do it again’. If it doesn’t, the markets will sell off in a big way. But the Fed will probably reassure the markets that it’s going to keep on doing it. There will be a QE 3 or perhaps a QE 2A (laughs). That’s the first milestone.

The greatest danger is that the Republicans in the US launch an effective campaign to stop the Fed from doing QE 2A. If there’s no more QE, everything implodes in the near term, as opposed to it imploding a little later. Effectively, the policy thinking now and for some time has been: “It’s better to die tomorrow than to die today.”

"China cant win a trade war,it will be massacred"

From:
<China can't win a trade war,it will be massacred>
<China can’t win a trade war; it will be massacred’>
 
The United States Of America, doesn't have talented a government liks SINgapore, who every economic downturn, comes up with a winner. We even have a singer, who can sing the downturn that became an upturn.

Can the Obama Administration or the USA beat that!
 
which i think why they are trying to bring WWIII in Asia, to create jobs as in WWII
 
Even if Bill Clinton is the president, there is little he can do.

There is no technology boom in US now and that's why the slump is persisting.
 
Back
Top