Mouthpiece CNA sinks to all time low, the logic is not even wrong!
hxxp://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/1231839/1/.html
Peasantpore: A pro-regime study concluded that local peasants are willing to pay more than twice to die comfortably than burden Ruler Loong a longer life span.
The queer study on end-of-life care preferences was presented by the Ah Lian Centre for Killing Old Peasants at a dodgy conference on Wednesday.
Researchers interviewed 522 pro regime peasants and permanent parasites aged 50 and above to find out how important factors such as life expectancy, pain management, and cost of treatment are in affecting decisions for end-of-life care.
Respondents were given hypothetical scenarios which force them to pick options to allow Ruler Loong to reduce health care spending.
The researchers pegged a monetary value to the various factors by seeing how peasants reduce their medisave usage so that they can donate them to Ruler Loong after they die.
As a result, on average, most peasants opt to be undergo morphine injections that do not exceed S$24,000 peanuts till they die. In addition, most peasants think quality healthcare was valued at S$21,600 year but they know many will die of neglect before the year is up.
The study found that on average, an additional year of life was only worth S$9,100 to older Peasants if they were critically ill. This supports evil Penang Laksa's earlier idea of asking peasants to dump their parents in hospices to ensure Ruler Loong does overspend on old peasants' healthcare.
Compared to the Ang Mohs $50,000 benchmark, old peasants' lives are indeed cheap.
The study also showed that peasants were only willing to pay S$5,400 a year to avoid burdening their kin.
For poor peasants who were unwilling to make trade-offs, the study found that biggest factor in deciding course of treatment was the expected cost of treatment -- 23 percent of respondents would always opt for the cheapest treatment, without regard for other factors. Not everyone can get SIA to charter a plane for their spouse or mama!
The next most important factor was place of death -- only a miserable 7 percent of peasants choose the course of treatment solely based on whether it would let them die at home. This proves that Penang Laksa was correct when he proposed sending old peasants to die in oversea hospices.
Researchers said the findings could have profitable implications on how the regime continues to reduce resources in providing end-of-life care for old peasants. The regime currently adopt a hands off approach to dying old peasants and wish more of them should die faster so that it can steal their annunity principal.
However, the evil team acknowledged that the silly study is skewed in such a way to allow the regime to force old peasants to die without creating fiscal problems for them.
A similar study is being conducted among advance cancer patients by hinting to them that further treatment is futile and most of them should simply die to give Ruler Loong an easier time to balance the budget.
hxxp://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/1231839/1/.html
Peasantpore: A pro-regime study concluded that local peasants are willing to pay more than twice to die comfortably than burden Ruler Loong a longer life span.
The queer study on end-of-life care preferences was presented by the Ah Lian Centre for Killing Old Peasants at a dodgy conference on Wednesday.
Researchers interviewed 522 pro regime peasants and permanent parasites aged 50 and above to find out how important factors such as life expectancy, pain management, and cost of treatment are in affecting decisions for end-of-life care.
Respondents were given hypothetical scenarios which force them to pick options to allow Ruler Loong to reduce health care spending.
The researchers pegged a monetary value to the various factors by seeing how peasants reduce their medisave usage so that they can donate them to Ruler Loong after they die.
As a result, on average, most peasants opt to be undergo morphine injections that do not exceed S$24,000 peanuts till they die. In addition, most peasants think quality healthcare was valued at S$21,600 year but they know many will die of neglect before the year is up.
The study found that on average, an additional year of life was only worth S$9,100 to older Peasants if they were critically ill. This supports evil Penang Laksa's earlier idea of asking peasants to dump their parents in hospices to ensure Ruler Loong does overspend on old peasants' healthcare.
Compared to the Ang Mohs $50,000 benchmark, old peasants' lives are indeed cheap.
The study also showed that peasants were only willing to pay S$5,400 a year to avoid burdening their kin.
For poor peasants who were unwilling to make trade-offs, the study found that biggest factor in deciding course of treatment was the expected cost of treatment -- 23 percent of respondents would always opt for the cheapest treatment, without regard for other factors. Not everyone can get SIA to charter a plane for their spouse or mama!
The next most important factor was place of death -- only a miserable 7 percent of peasants choose the course of treatment solely based on whether it would let them die at home. This proves that Penang Laksa was correct when he proposed sending old peasants to die in oversea hospices.
Researchers said the findings could have profitable implications on how the regime continues to reduce resources in providing end-of-life care for old peasants. The regime currently adopt a hands off approach to dying old peasants and wish more of them should die faster so that it can steal their annunity principal.
However, the evil team acknowledged that the silly study is skewed in such a way to allow the regime to force old peasants to die without creating fiscal problems for them.
A similar study is being conducted among advance cancer patients by hinting to them that further treatment is futile and most of them should simply die to give Ruler Loong an easier time to balance the budget.
