• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Misleading reports by Straits Times and Today on Hougant law suit

Confuseous

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
12,730
Points
113
The 2 reports, however, have left out the conditions upon which Ms Vellama will consider withdrawing her application, which Mr Ravi’s letter to the AGC had stated.

The reports did not mention that Ms Vellama’s offer to withdraw her application is contingent upon two agreements from the AGC, namely:

1. That the AGC withdrew its appeal against Judge Pillai’s decision for the case to be heard.

2. That the AGC would not seek costs against her.

The letter said if the AGC agreed to the 2 conditions, only then is Ms Vellama “prepared” to withdraw her application.

She made the offer to withdraw because “the factual objective of her litigation has now been achieved” with the Prime Minister having called a by-election in Hougang where Ms Vellama is a resident.

- http://www.publichouse.sg/categories/topstory/item/590-misleading-reports-by-straits-times-and-today
 
Back
Top