• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Min Wage OK for Ministers, Not OK for Citizens Woh

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Jul 24, 2008
Messages
33,627
Points
0
Feb 13, 2010

Why minimum wage system won't work

<!-- by line --><!-- end by line -->
<!-- end left side bar --><!-- story content : start -->
NOW and again, there are calls to set a minimum wage, which will not solve anything.
Businesses will likely transfer any increase in wages to the consumer via higher prices of products. This in turn will lead to another round of higher minimum wages. Forced higher wages all round will lead to increased liquidity and inflationary pressure on prices.
One of the ideas behind the minimum wage is to ensure that the minimum income is higher than welfare benefits, or other assistance, so as to wean people off welfare dependency. But large private sector industries must answer to shareholders with hefty profits and pay bonuses to top executives.
How will a minimum wage system work around this? It will be manipulated to hire fewer people so a company's wage costs do not rise. And it will mean inflated prices for everyone.
Perhaps we should consider the idea of a fair wage. That would mean looking at new ways to start businesses with government support as well. This can help ensure that people earn enough and the earnings are distributed in a fair manner.
This would involve paradigm-changing approaches such as:

Collective ownership of a business where all who work in it are shareholders; the Government could have a stake too.

Apart from regular wages, a system of profit sharing is set up for all who work in the business.

There should be no astronomical wages for anyone, and reasonable wages should depend on the nature of the job performed. Perhaps a higher ratio of profits can be given to those whose functions ensure high-end aspects of the profitability and sustainability of the business.

Apart from regular Central Provident Fund contributions and the like, a certain amount should be retained to be reinvested in the firm and set aside for additional health care, education and welfare benefits. This also prevents excess liquidity from flooding the economy.
This is just a set of general ideas that need to be extrapolated, improved and tweaked where necessary. But the old thinking that economic issues can be solved with the same system of stock market swings, inequitable incomes for a handful, and sudden unemployment due to so-called 'market forces' will not get us anywhere.
Sanjay Perera
 
Yes CCB to them.

With the lower income, they let in more lower paid FTs.

SINGAPOREANs must be stupid to vote for them again.

But then again in their words "SINGAPOREANS ARE OF VERY POOR STOCK.....WE ARE THE DESCENDANTS OF COLLIES FROM SOUTHERN CHINA..."
 
Min Wage OK for Ministers, Not OK for Citizens Woh

What we tolking about !

More like ; Maximum wage OK for Ministars, peasants get the below minimum wage !
 
Yes CCB to them.

With the lower income, they let in more lower paid FTs.

SINGAPOREANs must be stupid to vote for them again.

But then again in their words "SINGAPOREANS ARE OF VERY POOR STOCK.....WE ARE THE DESCENDANTS OF COLLIES FROM SOUTHERN CHINA..."

Did not HITLER use a similar excuse against about the Jews in WW2?

To bring in FTs to compete against your own citizens is amounting to exterminating your own race.
This is MODERN GENOCIDE
.

 
We shall give Zero tolerance for such practices that
contradicts Singapore citizen's way of life !
 
These people do not practise what they preach. They do not walk the talk.
Don't just complain here. Just make sure you and ALL your friends and relatives and others vote them out. Singapore had survive with the PAP and can survive without them.
 
The very crux of the problem is not min. wage. It's really the unequal distribution of the wealth in the world, a by-product of capitalism. In the Capitalism world, the harder you work, the more you will get. However, hard work is not measured by how much sweat you got out. In today's world, it's how much you can bring in for the company. Up till now, I really can understand why a financial executive can earn exorbitant bonuses, when in actual fact, they create nothing tangible. Yes, they manage the wealth of riches and super-riches and take credit for miniscule profits. Of course, they will charge you very high fees just to "look after" your account.

In other business, it's the same. Companies are always looking for record profits and revenues. Where are these profits from? From everyone of us, directly or indirectly. Let's look at the pie chart. What we can see is that there is a higher portion of the pie taken over by smaller percentage of the world population, leaving a miserable small slice for the bottom and middel layers. But can the riches spend them all? Tax system is actually a way to help redistribute the money so that the lesser mortals can benefit from the boom. But the world today, it seems only favour ppl who are well-off.
 
In Las Vegas, croupier get paid US$7.25 per hour and that is min. pay there.
With IR in full swing, if our croupiers get paid S$1800 per month, should it not be officially recognised as min. wage?
Actually gahmen must declare a min. wage and peg their wage as a multiple of that; in some enlightened companies in Fortune 500, the top pay do not exceed 28 times of the lowest pay in the company. In other words if the top cat wanted more pay, he must work very hard to uplift the lowest pay! That is fairness unless the greedy money grabber we have in power.
What is it telling us when an ex minister is only paid $22,000 per month in the private sector? All bloody mediocre ministers are far over paid - they are worth slightly more that toilet paper in the private biz world
 
What is it telling us when an ex minister is only paid $22,000 per month in the private sector? All bloody mediocre ministers are far over paid - they are worth slightly more that toilet paper in the private biz world

In pte sector, if the company is paying you more than 10K per month, you have to prepare to work your butt off. Any decision you make, u will be held responsible. Your KPIs are closely monitored and there are lines of ppl waiting in the sidelines to prowl on you given an opportunity.

For our gov, it seems honest mistakes and being caught off-guard are not grave enough to warrant a re-evaluation if the person's credentials and suitability. Beats me why we give them more than a mil a year.
 
Back
Top