http://sammyboy.com/showthread.php?...hot-down-MH17-with-Outdated-BUK-missile-(pics
When Russia denoted 2 types of BUK missiles to prove the truth, the West says unsure and No Smoking Gun. Just trying to deny on behalf Ukraine. MH-17 was downed by Ukraine using poor Soviet Era BUK missiles that Russia already stopped using. Pax & Crew of MH-17 are killed by US backed Ukraine. Which West started to shift blame on Russia since day one.
Why don't Obama fly inside his Air Force One also over Ukraine and let Putin test his new BUK missile, see if the marks sputtered by blast fragments on wreckage is similar with MH-17's marks or not. That will get some answers! Huh? BUK is good, and even B-52 will be wrecked and downed. It has a good coverage up to altitude of 25km, and radius 30km approx. If you want to cover SG airspace protection any deployment of BUK in say McRitche area is enough to shoot down any planes intruding SG.
When Russia denoted 2 types of BUK missiles to prove the truth, the West says unsure and No Smoking Gun. Just trying to deny on behalf Ukraine. MH-17 was downed by Ukraine using poor Soviet Era BUK missiles that Russia already stopped using. Pax & Crew of MH-17 are killed by US backed Ukraine. Which West started to shift blame on Russia since day one.
Why don't Obama fly inside his Air Force One also over Ukraine and let Putin test his new BUK missile, see if the marks sputtered by blast fragments on wreckage is similar with MH-17's marks or not. That will get some answers! Huh? BUK is good, and even B-52 will be wrecked and downed. It has a good coverage up to altitude of 25km, and radius 30km approx. If you want to cover SG airspace protection any deployment of BUK in say McRitche area is enough to shoot down any planes intruding SG.
