Meritocracy in Singapore is tainted badly

Johnrambo

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Apr 10, 2017
Messages
4,084
Points
113
Although faith in Meritocracy is weakening, the ideology will remain a key principle for recognising individuals in Singapore. Though meritocracy is under siege, it has not failed. In the last few years, meritocracy has taken on a negative overtones due to its association with elitism and there has been an ongoing debate over social inequality and stratification in society. Even those who rail against meritocracy struggle to come up with a better system”– Education Minister Ong Ye Kung.

True meritocracy is a very noble ideal and lest you are unaware, meritocracy comes from the word, Merit. During the early years of our nation-building, true meritocracy had indeed served us well; only truly the best were appointed to roles based on his/her merit. However as inequality and stratification surreptitiously crept in, more sinister machinations have since taken root in society - should we continue to ignore or pretend everything is sunshine and rainbows, our ostrich mentality will definitely cost this country a great deal.

Pray tell, what has gone wrong with the notion of meritocracy in Singapore so much so it is now terribly weakened, much questioned and despised by our own citizens?

Well the answer is very simple really, if only the Lee Hsien Loong administration is willing to be courageous and honest with itself: meritocracy in Singapore under this useless government has become a badly tainted farce. Genuine meritocracy on the other hand is pretty much six feet under.

More at https://www.domainofexperts.com/2019/08/meritocracy-in-singapore-is-tainted.html
 
Meritocracy and democracy cannot exist in tandem.
One must have chinese traits or submit to one in order to be recognise as a merit.
 
Agree very much with the taint.

Meritocracy has been used to white wash over obvious conflicts of interests. The biggest and most glaring one is the appointment of spouse of PM as head of SWF.

What would have been ethically or morally unacceptable becomes legitimized under the guise of merit.

Yes there is no obvious replacement to the system of merit, but merit should never supercede ethics. And where such conflicts exists, there is no shame with passing over the best candidate for the 2nd best.
 
Although faith in Meritocracy is weakening, the ideology will remain a key principle for recognising individuals in Singapore. Though meritocracy is under siege, it has not failed. In the last few years, meritocracy has taken on a negative overtones due to its association with elitism and there has been an ongoing debate over social inequality and stratification in society. Even those who rail against meritocracy struggle to come up with a better system”– Education Minister Ong Ye Kung.

True meritocracy is a very noble ideal and lest you are unaware, meritocracy comes from the word, Merit. During the early years of our nation-building, true meritocracy had indeed served us well; only truly the best were appointed to roles based on his/her merit. However as inequality and stratification surreptitiously crept in, more sinister machinations have since taken root in society - should we continue to ignore or pretend everything is sunshine and rainbows, our ostrich mentality will definitely cost this country a great deal.

Pray tell, what has gone wrong with the notion of meritocracy in Singapore so much so it is now terribly weakened, much questioned and despised by our own citizens?

Well the answer is very simple really, if only the Lee Hsien Loong administration is willing to be courageous and honest with itself: meritocracy in Singapore under this useless government has become a badly tainted farce. Genuine meritocracy on the other hand is pretty much six feet under.

More at https://www.domainofexperts.com/2019/08/meritocracy-in-singapore-is-tainted.html
Bro, meritocracy means you choose the laulan runner to represent SG in SEA games. His time fastest. Don't choose already tell u something wrong with PAP today not the PAP of LKY time. :unsure:
 
Meritocracy and democracy cannot exist in tandem.
One must have chinese traits or submit to one in order to be recognise as a merit.

Cannot complain too much even though it is a pseudo-democracy or else we degenerate into kleptocracy which is even worse! :roflmao:
 
What meritocracy? Look at Ng Yat Chung. I rest my case. :roflmao:
He is scholar. General. Help shareholder make a lot of money selling companies. What no merit? Glass housers should not throw rocks! :mad:
 
He is scholar. General. Help shareholder make a lot of money selling companies. What no merit? Glass housers should not throw rocks! :mad:

Ehh... wat happened to NOL ya:roflmao:. A number of blue chip co profit down....couple of them just to name a few i.e. like SIA...SPH....
 
Back
Top