Transmodified from hxxp://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/1258178/1/.html
PEASANTPORE: A wayang review into whether a Victorian era section of the kangaroo law that criminalizes bapok sex is unconstitutional was conducted at the High Kangaroo Court on Wednesday morning.
Kangaroo Quentin Loh has reserved judgement to buy some time as he is asking his Neh colleagues pals for help to twist and turn his way out of trouble. He is expected to deliver his verdict that continues to balk bapok sex at a later date.
Bapok Tan Eng Hong brought his silly case to court arguing that Section 377A of the Penal Code goes against Article 12 of the constitution, which says all persons are free before the law to poke each another's arses. Yet Section 377A of the Penal Code criminalises sex between bapoks.
His started his vendetta against the regime when he was busted in 2010 having oral sex with another bapok at a public toilet in CityLink Mall.
He applied to have Section 377A declared unconstitutional because he thinks other peasants love to watch him suck another bapok's cock in a toilet. That stupid law violates his and other peasants' rights to watch a free cock sucking show between two consenting bapoks.
Bapok Tan was then made an example and charged under a different section of the Penal Code for an indecent act. Pissed with the joke played on him, he swore to make life difficult for the regime and his application to declare that Section 377A is unconstitutional was initially struck out.
As bapoks have that die hard streak, Bapok Tan took his case to the Kangaroo Court of Appeal, where it decide to toy with him by ruling last year that he had a right to waste more money and make a fool of himself by applying to pursue the constitutional challenge.
The three kangarooo judges who presided over that hearing said that they found an arguable case as Jewish norms should have no effect on the Section 377A inherited from the Brits to deal with paedophiles. But they understood Ruler Loong's political calculations and decided to admit Bapok Tan's case to the High Kangaroo Court to teach bapoks a lesson to impress the more rabid X'tians.
In arguing Bapok Tan's case on Wednesday during the closed-door hearing, anti-regime lawyer Mr M Ravi said that Section 377A is "inherently absurd, arbitrary, vague and discriminatory as it foist a Jewish outlook onto decadent Asiatic culture."
But Moslem Abdul-la-lah, who is representing the regime, submitted that 377A has the purpose of reflecting public morality to placate X'tians who were already pissed with Ruler Loong for the Casinos.
He added that Peasantpore society is still largely Asiatic and have no fight with bapoks. The trouble makers are the X'tians who interpret the Jewish Torah literally and declare war on bapoks. He is reminding the Kangaroo Judges while they have the independence of mind and logic to propose abolishing that stupid law, yet they must be mindful that they are merely kangaroo judges. Kangaroos who must interpret the laws based on Ruler Loong intentions. If Ruler Loong wants to retain the anti-bapok laws to make X'tians happy, the Kangaroo Justices must 'lan lan' reflect their ruler's intent.
The standard defence to be used is that bapoks undermine traditional Asiatic family values underpinning society in Asiatic Peasantpore.
Just last month, Kangaroo Justice Loh also presided over the hearing between the regime and bapoks pretending to be graphic designers Gary Lim and Kenneth Chee. The bapok pair has foolishly also sought a repeal of Section 377A, arguing that it goes against Article 12 of the constitution that allows bapoks to poke each others arse as equals instead of doing the boring 69.
Justice Loh also reserved judgment, buying time to allow his neh colleagues to apply Neh Serpent Logic to twist and turn his way out of trouble.
PEASANTPORE: A wayang review into whether a Victorian era section of the kangaroo law that criminalizes bapok sex is unconstitutional was conducted at the High Kangaroo Court on Wednesday morning.
Kangaroo Quentin Loh has reserved judgement to buy some time as he is asking his Neh colleagues pals for help to twist and turn his way out of trouble. He is expected to deliver his verdict that continues to balk bapok sex at a later date.
Bapok Tan Eng Hong brought his silly case to court arguing that Section 377A of the Penal Code goes against Article 12 of the constitution, which says all persons are free before the law to poke each another's arses. Yet Section 377A of the Penal Code criminalises sex between bapoks.
His started his vendetta against the regime when he was busted in 2010 having oral sex with another bapok at a public toilet in CityLink Mall.
He applied to have Section 377A declared unconstitutional because he thinks other peasants love to watch him suck another bapok's cock in a toilet. That stupid law violates his and other peasants' rights to watch a free cock sucking show between two consenting bapoks.
Bapok Tan was then made an example and charged under a different section of the Penal Code for an indecent act. Pissed with the joke played on him, he swore to make life difficult for the regime and his application to declare that Section 377A is unconstitutional was initially struck out.
As bapoks have that die hard streak, Bapok Tan took his case to the Kangaroo Court of Appeal, where it decide to toy with him by ruling last year that he had a right to waste more money and make a fool of himself by applying to pursue the constitutional challenge.
The three kangarooo judges who presided over that hearing said that they found an arguable case as Jewish norms should have no effect on the Section 377A inherited from the Brits to deal with paedophiles. But they understood Ruler Loong's political calculations and decided to admit Bapok Tan's case to the High Kangaroo Court to teach bapoks a lesson to impress the more rabid X'tians.
In arguing Bapok Tan's case on Wednesday during the closed-door hearing, anti-regime lawyer Mr M Ravi said that Section 377A is "inherently absurd, arbitrary, vague and discriminatory as it foist a Jewish outlook onto decadent Asiatic culture."
But Moslem Abdul-la-lah, who is representing the regime, submitted that 377A has the purpose of reflecting public morality to placate X'tians who were already pissed with Ruler Loong for the Casinos.
He added that Peasantpore society is still largely Asiatic and have no fight with bapoks. The trouble makers are the X'tians who interpret the Jewish Torah literally and declare war on bapoks. He is reminding the Kangaroo Judges while they have the independence of mind and logic to propose abolishing that stupid law, yet they must be mindful that they are merely kangaroo judges. Kangaroos who must interpret the laws based on Ruler Loong intentions. If Ruler Loong wants to retain the anti-bapok laws to make X'tians happy, the Kangaroo Justices must 'lan lan' reflect their ruler's intent.
The standard defence to be used is that bapoks undermine traditional Asiatic family values underpinning society in Asiatic Peasantpore.
Just last month, Kangaroo Justice Loh also presided over the hearing between the regime and bapoks pretending to be graphic designers Gary Lim and Kenneth Chee. The bapok pair has foolishly also sought a repeal of Section 377A, arguing that it goes against Article 12 of the constitution that allows bapoks to poke each others arse as equals instead of doing the boring 69.
Justice Loh also reserved judgment, buying time to allow his neh colleagues to apply Neh Serpent Logic to twist and turn his way out of trouble.
Last edited:
