If India do this...many of their men will kenna

BuiKia

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Joined
Jan 18, 2010
Messages
7,177
Points
48
Courts will now be able to order chemical castration for all rapists from Tuesday, as part of imposing tougher penalties against sex crimes.

Until now the hormone treatment has been a sentencing option only for child sex offenders, but can now apply to all convicted rapists through the legal revision, according to the Ministry of Justice Sunday. The treatment can also be ordered by a committee operating under the Ministry of Justice.

The bill, which was passed in December, comes into effect after a three-month legal probation, the ministry said. The ministry added that the new rule is also applicable for rapists who were convicted earlier.

According to the revised bill, rapists can be subject to up to 15 years of chemical treatment during sentencing or as part of their parole conditions. committee decisions are limited to three years.

In the first such sentence since the measure was first introduced in 2011, the Seoul Southern District Court earlier this year sentenced a repeated rapist of teenage girls to chemical castration. The court ordered the 31-year-old offender to undergo three years of chemical treatment as well as 200 hours of therapy and wear an electronic tracking ankle bracelet for 20 years.

The National Assembly in July 2011 passed a bill allowing the administration of libido-suppressing hormone medication for convicted child molesters who are over 19 years of age.

Advocates claim that the use of chemical castration is an effective and scientific method of reducing sexual crimes, while human rights activists and religious groups oppose it, saying it seriously infringes upon basic human rights.

The Constitutional Court is currently reviewing whether the chemical punishment is in violation of constitution and infringes basic human rights.
 
chop off their lan jiao most effective :D 杀鸡儆猴
 
Chemical castration is not as lethal as it sounds. Merely sexual repression drugs. Not as if they use acid to burn off the penis.
 
.......................................... is currently reviewing whether the chemical punishment is in violation of constitution and infringes basic human rights.

As far as I am concerned, criminals (especially violent ones) should not have the "rights" associated with regular humans. What is wrong with this fucking society?

Cheers!
 
Indian legal and court systems are very well known to be sloppy and full of red tape.

So the question belies is who will follow through to ensure that the chemical castration is enforced once sentence is put down? The rapist will probably just skip town and continue with his deeds again.


Courts will now be able to order chemical castration for all rapists from Tuesday, as part of imposing tougher penalties against sex crimes.

Until now the hormone treatment has been a sentencing option only for child sex offenders, but can now apply to all convicted rapists through the legal revision, according to the Ministry of Justice Sunday. The treatment can also be ordered by a committee operating under the Ministry of Justice.

The bill, which was passed in December, comes into effect after a three-month legal probation, the ministry said. The ministry added that the new rule is also applicable for rapists who were convicted earlier.

According to the revised bill, rapists can be subject to up to 15 years of chemical treatment during sentencing or as part of their parole conditions. committee decisions are limited to three years.

In the first such sentence since the measure was first introduced in 2011, the Seoul Southern District Court earlier this year sentenced a repeated rapist of teenage girls to chemical castration. The court ordered the 31-year-old offender to undergo three years of chemical treatment as well as 200 hours of therapy and wear an electronic tracking ankle bracelet for 20 years.

The National Assembly in July 2011 passed a bill allowing the administration of libido-suppressing hormone medication for convicted child molesters who are over 19 years of age.

Advocates claim that the use of chemical castration is an effective and scientific method of reducing sexual crimes, while human rights activists and religious groups oppose it, saying it seriously infringes upon basic human rights.

The Constitutional Court is currently reviewing whether the chemical punishment is in violation of constitution and infringes basic human rights.
 
Back
Top