I so stupid: Please help me understand Sinkie gabrament's line of reasoning

[dr.wailing]

The Sinkie gabrament has banned Tan Pin Pin's film from being screened publicly in Sinkieland as doing so poses a national security threat.

However one of our ministars--who incidentally belongs to the inner circle of Familee--recently paid a visit to the cradle of Communism accompanied by senior Communist cadres/comrades. Our ministar even praised Mao Zedong, the man who fought against the legitimate government of that time.

Please help me understand why our ministar's recent actions in Jinggangshan do not pose a security threat to Sinkieland whereas Tan Pin Pin's film about the lives of some communists 45 years ago still pose a national security threat.

NB: The attached photo is taken from The Straits Times, April 10, 2015, page A15 titled "DPM Teo visits historic Chinese city"

 

[shittypore]

Simply, if its the truth they will not permit it to be screen but if it's a lie than allowed, funny tinking Gahman.

 

[kryonlight]

Pragmatic pimps and integrity are mutually exclusive.

 

[xpo2015]

Ministars have millions salaries, won't form strong unions and ask pay rise like commoners?

 

[tonychat]

The Sinkie gabrament has banned Tan Pin Pin's film from being screened publicly in Sinkieland as doing so poses a national security threat.

However one of our ministars--who incidentally belongs to the inner circle of Familee--recently paid a visit to the cradle of Communism accompanied by senior Communist cadres/comrades. Our ministar even praised Mao Zedong, the man who fought against the legitimate government of that time.

Please help me understand why our ministar's recent actions in Jinggangshan do not pose a security threat to Sinkieland whereas Tan Pin Pin's film about the lives of some communists 45 years ago still pose a national security threat.

NB: The attached photo is taken from The Straits Times, April 10, 2015, page A15 titled "DPM Teo visits historic Chinese city"

What they mean is the tan pin pin's film pose a security threat towards the PAP and not the country.. So must banned it to preserve the fake integrity of the PAP.

 

[laksaboy]

'A threat to Singapore' really means 'a threat to the PAP'.

That's is why until despotic regimes crumble, the country will remain in a state of arrested development. The people in power won't bat an eyelid while they insult your intelligence with such lies, because they know you are being oppressed and they can get away with whatever deceit and abuse they dish out.