Hopeless CASE

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Jul 25, 2008
Messages
15,049
Points
113
An organisation controlled by the PAP government to subdue consumer rights. Helmed by PAP puppets parachuted in from the PA, grassroots, civil service, military service. A second career for those dogs who have served their masters and are no longer of useful service.

Forum: Curious what percentage of complainants are helped by Case​


JAN 15, 2022

I read with interest the Forum reply by the Consumers Association of Singapore (Case) on actions that it has taken on errant firms (Case has options to go after errant firms, Jan 11).
The quoted number of escalated cases seems very low - 17 compliance agreements and five cases brought to the Competition and Consumer Commission of Singapore since 2018.
I visited Case's website and found 41 firms on Case's alert list, another low number.
Can Case give the percentages of total Case complaints these agreements, unfair practice cases and blacklisted number of firms make up?
I am very curious about Case's ability to help the majority of complainants as Case has told my friends and me that there is little that it can do about errant retailers who take payment and fail to deliver goods and services, and our only recourse is to take up civil suits against the retailers.

Theresa Lim Siew Leng
 
1. To get CASE to help you, you need to be their member.
2. If the company you complained is a member of CASETRUST, bear in mind that company contributes more revenue to CASE than you as an individual.
3. If you write to SPH media, and complain about a CASETRUST-accredited company, SPH will either not publish it, or first notify CASE to validate your case, before publishing. I am not kidding about this, CASE peddles their CASETRUST accreditation to retailers by stating this benefit.

So SPH is not unbiased.
 
CASE is another 'ownself check ownself' organization of the PAP regime. All the CASE chiefs have been the most trashy PAP dogs. Nice little chobolan cushy job. :biggrin:
 

$169,000 in insurance payouts unclaimed by customers following spa closures​

sv_spa_190722.jpg

About 580 consumers could not be contacted or have not responded to CaseTrust's appointed insurer to collect their payouts. PHOTO: ST FILE

July 19, 2022

SINGAPORE - About 580 consumers could not be contacted or have not responded to CaseTrust's appointed insurer to collect a total of $169,000 in prepayment protection insurance payouts.
The sum is part of the payout for those affected by the closure of 28 CaseTrust-accredited spas and wellness businesses between February 2017 and last month, said the Consumer Association of Singapore (Case) on Tuesday (July 19).
More than $280,000 had been paid out since 2017 under the scheme to 512 affected consumers, with each customer receiving an average of about $540.
Case introduced prepayment protection in the CaseTrust spa and wellness accreditation scheme in 2011. Spa and wellness businesses accredited under the scheme are required to protect prepayments made by consumers via the purchase of prepayment protection insurance.
Upon prepayment to such accredited businesses, customers would be issued insurance certificates which include details such as their personal details and insured sum. If these businesses fold, the appointed insurer will contact affected customers for the payouts.
As at July 13 this year, more than $15.8 million in prepayments by consumers are insured through the scheme, with more than $263 million in total prepayments protected since the introduction of the prepayment protection feature.
Case president Melvin Yong said many businesses in the spa and wellness industry have been impacted by Covid-19, with some having to close down, and the prepayment protection scheme has helped customers secure the unused portions of their packages, which can be up to tens of thousands of dollars.

He added: "While the CaseTrust prepayment protection scheme helps safeguard consumers' prepayment amounts for the spa and renovation contractor industries, there is a need to look into how we can better protect consumers' prepayments for other businesses, especially in areas where consumers tend to make large sums of payment upfront.
"I have called on the government to strengthen existing prepayment protection legislation, and mandate prepayment protection in industries where consumers report a high amount of prepayment losses."
Case has urged those with pending claims from shuttered CaseTrust-accredited spas and wellness outlets to contact AVA Insurance at [email protected] or 6535-1828. The list of such accredited businesses that closed between February 2017 and last month can be found on the CaseTrust website.
Claims must be submitted to AVA Insurance within six years of the business closure.
 

Forum: Is action taken against errant CaseTrust-accredited contractors?​


Aug 4, 2022

It was recently reported that 807 complaints were lodged with the Consumers Association of Singapore (Case) in the first half of the year against renovation contractors (Complaints against renovation contractors up due to unsatisfactory workmanship, delays, July 28).
Case advises home owners to patronise CaseTrust's list of accredited renovation contractors. It would be helpful if Case could reveal which of its members have complaints lodged against them.
I have been a victim of a CaseTrust-accredited renovation contractor.
Not only did the contractor ignore the CaseTrust contract template, but he also brought in an uncertified subcontractor to handle my renovation. When faced with subcontractor problems, the contractor disavowed his responsibility.
It seemed that this accredited member is no different from a non-CaseTrust contractor.
CaseTrust accreditation shows a company's commitment to fair business practices and honesty in its dealings with customers. Does CaseTrust conduct checks to ensure compliance by its members?
For those with complaints lodged against them, will it take action against them?

Low Wai Yee
 
1. To get CASE to help you, you need to be their member.
2. If the company you complained is a member of CASETRUST, bear in mind that company contributes more revenue to CASE than you as an individual.
3. If you write to SPH media, and complain about a CASETRUST-accredited company, SPH will either not publish it, or first notify CASE to validate your case, before publishing. I am not kidding about this, CASE peddles their CASETRUST accreditation to retailers by stating this benefit.

So SPH is not unbiased.

You are right.
After submitting all the relevnt documents and waiting donkey months,
they will tell you to file a civil suit.
 
Reminds me of NTUC-if you want to bring up any matter, you have to be a member and your fees must be current before they will listen to your issues.
They will only speak to your employer if you are a member for at least 6 months-even SAF BMT is only 3 months but NTUC need 6 months to pass out.
MOM no different , the officer say they are pro employment but that is another story
 
Last edited:

Genting Dream customers denied boarding: Case president calls for review of overbooking practices​

sv-cruise-110922.jpg

More than 100 customers were denied boarding cruise ship Genting Dream on Sept 4 due to overbooking. PHOTO: SHIN MIN DAILY NEWS
rosalind_byline.png

Rosalind Ang

SEP 11, 2022

SINGAPORE - The practice of overbooking should be reviewed to protect consumers in Singapore's tourism and hospitality industry, said Consumers Association of Singapore (Case) president Melvin Yong in a Facebook post on Sunday.
This comes after more than 100 customers were denied boarding cruise ship Genting Dream on Sept 4 due to overbooking.
There is currently no regulation for the practice of overbooking and how affected consumers should be compensated, wrote Mr Yong, adding that consumers can rely only on conditions of carriage or insurance coverage, which may not be entirely in their favour.
Conditions of carriage refer to the terms and conditions cited by transportation companies for using their services.
Mr Yong wrote: "It is perhaps timely for the relevant authorities and service providers to review the practice of overbooking and how consumers can be protected in our tourism and hospitality industry in Singapore."
The authorities should consider regulating how affected customers should be compensated, as is the case in the United States and Europe, he added.

In overbooking, more tickets are sold than seats available, as service providers in the tourism and hospitality industry expect some clients to not show up.

In the Sept 4 incident, the Genting Dream was due to depart Singapore on that day for calls at Port Klang and Penang before returning to Singapore.
It can accommodate 3,352 passengers.
A Resorts World Cruises (RWC) spokesman had said that all affected guests will receive a full refund. They will also get a complimentary cruise on the Genting Dream for sailings before April 28, 2023, subject to cabin availability.

"While the practice of overbooking is not unusual, this could not have come at a worse time for affected consumers," wrote Mr Yong.
The offer of a full refund and a complimentary cruise may not address the concerns of some consumers who had taken leave and were expecting to have a good vacation with friends and family, he noted.
This is because the incident came amid Singapore relaxing its Covid-19 measures and the September school holidays.
Service providers like RWC should review the accuracy of their back-end algorithms that may be based on outdated data, Mr Yong added.

They should also cater for a bigger buffer in the light of peak holiday seasons, as well as the pent-up demand for vacations after more than two years of Covid-19 travel restrictions, he wrote.
Affected consumers can approach Case via hotline on 9795-8397 or visit Case's website for advice.
RWC, one of two cruise lines operating in Singapore, started sailings on June 15.
Genting Dream was previously used by Genting Hong Kong-owned Dream Cruises before Genting Hong Kong collapsed due to financial troubles.
 
if you want to help yourself, go to Small Claims Tribunal. Cost only a little more to file a case with Small Claims Tribunal than Case Membership.

Just look at those IDs and contractors who got away.

Case is there to limit the fallout from consumers' adverse reactions, in case there is a major scam.
 

72 complaints filed against S’pore shipping firm Tamilan Express Cargo for non-delivery of goods​

IMG2029.jpg


The complaints against Tamilan Express Cargo were lodged between January and December 2022. ST PHOTO: JESSIE LIM
jessielim.png


Jessie Lim

DEC 12, 2022

SINGAPORE - Some 72 complaints have been lodged against Singapore-based shipping company Tamilan Express Cargo and Logistics for failing to deliver items from Singapore to India.
The complaints were lodged between January and December 2022 by consumers, most of whom said the items they sent via sea cargo delivery never reached their intended recipients, even after waiting for up to a full year.
In response to queries, the Consumers Association of Singapore (Case) said: “The value of the items, which include electronic goods, household products, foodstuff, clothing and personal items, ranged between $90 and $20,000.
“In addition, consumers reported that the company was unresponsive to their requests for assistance and refund.”
Under the Consumer Protection (Fair Trading) Act, it is an unfair practice for a supplier to accept payment for the supply of goods or services when it knows or ought to know it will not be able to do so within the period specified by the supplier.
Case said it has issued a warning letter to Tamilan Express Cargo and will engage it to enter a voluntary compliance agreement to cease its errant business practices and promptly resolve consumer complaints.
A search on the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority website last week showed that Tamilan Express Cargo, which is located in Little India, was registered in July 2020.

When The Straits Times visited the firm’s premises last Wednesday, the shutters were down and there was a notice informing customers that it was relocating.
In the notice, Tamilan Express Cargo said 25 containers worth of items belonging to its customers would be delivered in India, but did not specify a timeline.
When contacted by ST, Tamilan Express Cargo did not respond to queries about why the items were undelivered and whether customers would be compensated.


The police confirmed that reports were lodged and they are looking into the matter.
IMG2025.jpg


The store front of Tamilan Express Cargo was shuttered and there was a notice informing customers that the store was relocating, when The Straits Times visited the shop last Wednesday. ST PHOTO: JESSIE LIM
Mr Santhanam Muthukarthikeyan, 41, paid $900 to ship five boxes of household items – including a $869 Samsung television set – from Singapore to his home town in Tamil Nadu, India.
The Singapore permanent resident said: “We had photo frames containing pictures taken when our family went on holiday in Bali and Dubai. I feel sad because these are memories we cannot get back.”
Since he engaged Tamilan Express Cargo’s services in May 2021, he has not received confirmation that his parcels have been delivered to his family in India.
Mr Muthukarthikeyan said: “For the first three months, they told me my items will reach in two weeks. When I kept asking, they said my items were stuck in Customs but they refused to give me more information about the port and parcel tracking number.”

Shipping companies ST spoke to said it was unusual for parcels to spend many months in transit between Singapore and India.
Mr Hameed Sulthan Yousoof Ali, 44, owner of Star Cargo & Logistics, said: “For the last six months, we have been delivering our items within 30 days.
“There is no port congestion. After 14 days, if your items are still in the container, you have to pay the shipping line a fee every day.”
Mrs Priyanka Mistry, 33, said her personal items, including her late mother’s wedding sari, remain missing despite Tamilan Express Cargo assuring her last December they would deliver them to Pune, India, where she currently lives.
The Indian national had paid $240 in shipping fees to the company.
Mrs Mistry, who is a housewife, said: “These boxes contain all my memories. I’ve written to Case, I’ve tried calling Tamilan, but I’m not getting any outcome.
“I can’t even buy furniture for my new house because I’m still waiting and hoping I can get those items back.”
 
Heres a simple one for simpletons. If the boss is a foreigner how do you get back your money? Sinkies are bery dumb
 

What getting booted off a S’pore airline reveals about managing crises​

Airlines can do more to turn a negative experience into a positive one​

ang_qing_0.png

Ang Qing
yaohui-pixgeneric-1633_0.jpg

The writer and her family were recently kicked off a Scoot flight because the airline had sold too many tickets. ST PHOTO: LIM YAOHUI


JAN 15, 2023

One imagines that buckling your seat belt on the plane marks the start of a holiday.
Last month, I learnt how wrong this assumption was, when my parents and I were kicked off a red-eye flight on budget carrier Scoot because the local airline had sold too many tickets.
Initially, the airline had announced to seated passengers at about 5am that they needed two volunteers to relinquish their seats in exchange for a later flight to the same destination on a cushier airline.
No one on the flight did, and about half an hour after the plane was scheduled to depart, my 60-year-old father was told to leave the aircraft. He had rejected the first offer and $200 of compensation.
Instantly, the incident of a bloodied passenger being dragged off a United Airlines plane in 2017 for refusing to be bumped off the plane did not feel so remote.

After some resistance, my mother and I followed suit, as we did not want to leave my father behind.
While such experiences are unpleasant and unfortunate, bumping passengers off flights because of overbooking is an unspoken policy in the travel and leisure industry here and abroad.

As recently as September last year, more than 100 passengers were bumped off Genting Dream amid the resurgence in travel.
In a commentary for Channel News Asia, associate professors at Singapore University of Social Sciences’ School of Business Lau Kong Cheen and Vanessa Liu explained that selling more seats than available allows airlines to maximise profit while accounting for the likelihood of customers not showing up or cancelling their trips last minute.
If overbooking is eliminated, travellers will have to pay higher prices to cover up potential losses arising from no-shows and cancellations, they argued.


On top of this, the option of rescheduling or cancelling a booking could be removed so airlines and cruises can guarantee that each seat will be filled, they added.
While there might be a science to overbooking, telling an irate customer that she has to get off a plane because of business reasons does little to defuse a sour situation, which can and has ended in violence.
In some countries, regulation provides rights for compensation and restitution to customers who encounter these incidents.
In the European Union, passengers who have been denied boarding due to overbooking are entitled to increasing amounts of compensation based on how far their flight is.
For instance, getting bumped off a flight of more than 1,500km within the European Union entitles passengers to €400 (S$570).
No such protection exists in Singapore, which means that customers like me are left to their own devices to negotiate for compensation with little clue of how to go about it, apart from hastily searched-for guidance from other countries.
Consumers Association of Singapore (Case) president Melvin Yong said the consumer watchdog has received a total of six complaints on overbooking in 2022, of which five were related to flights and one to overbooking of a cruise.
Notwithstanding the fact that all cruise passengers affected by overbooking in Singapore have been compensated and the Singapore Tourism Board’s assurance that it will ensure the practice is carried out responsibly by cruise operators, Case will continue to monitor such complaints, said Mr Yong.
Those affected by the issue can approach Case by calling 9795 8397, he added.

The absence of regulation, however, leaves decision-making on compensating customers up to the airlines themselves, which can range from vouchers for another flight with the airline to cash.
This often comes at the customer’s expense, as contesting any decisions made by the airline takes days to resolve. At the time of writing, my complaint has yet to be addressed for at least three weeks.
Ultimately, overbooking also does not bode well for airlines and their reputation in an age when disgruntled customers can easily take to social media to air their grievances.
In the absence of regulation, some consumers have leveraged overbooking to their advantage.
US consumer activist Ralph Nader was initially awarded US$15,010 after suing an airline for kicking him off a flight in 1972. While his victory was later overturned, the US Civil Aeronautics Board then required airlines to post a notice at ticket counters stating that passengers whose reservations could not be accommodated on overbooked flights may be entitled to compensation.
It is therefore in everyone’s interests that staff are ready and able to deal with such crises when their company is at fault.
Staff should be equipped to communicate the crisis and methods for recourse truthfully and clearly.
After getting booted off the plane, my parents and I had to repeatedly press for details about the replacement flight that Scoot had offered.
15Jansundayviews2page-0001_0.jpg

ST ILLUSTRATION: MANNY FRANCISCO
While relocated to a lounge in the wee hours of the morning, we were left to wait for hours with no details about the alternative flight that Scoot had promised, apart from the timing.
After bouts of questioning, we learnt that the flight dangled as a substitute entailed a transit in Seoul, where we would need to transfer to a different airport via train.
Alternatively, we had to forgo our plans and take the next direct flight scheduled two days later. We eventually opted for the latter, as this option meant that we did not need to make a one-hour drive in darkness to our accommodation in Jeju.
The lack of clarity about our next steps only made us more unhappy, as we were left to our own devices to sort out the mess caused by the airline. While we were discreetly offered $750 in cash by a staff member at the lounge, this did not come with any explanation for how this number was arrived at. Despite the good intentions, this only made us angrier and more suspicious of whether the airline was trying to cover up its mistake.
What could have defused the situation was if the airline had been transparent about how and why the error occurred, and had apologised and provided concrete steps on how it intended to make good the situation.
In fact, if overbooking is a common practice, there should be procedures and policies to make sure overbooked passengers are treated properly, because they too are customers who have booked tickets.
And while the practice may not go away, airlines can work towards winning over such passengers, so people will end up having a good experience with the airline overall despite the delay.
 
You are right.
After submitting all the relevnt documents and waiting donkey months,
they will tell you to file a civil suit.

That should be the proper due process. Wasting time compliant to a body not a party to the contract.
 
WHY MY FLIGHT IS OVERBOOKED AND I WAS DENIED TO BOARD


1673790208654.png



MY ANSWER

MORE FLIGHTS ARE GETTING OVERBOOKED NOW-A-DAYS AS CECA INFECTED TRAVELLERS FLOODING TO CATCH THE CHEAP FLIGHT ALL OVER THE WORLD. As airlines decides whom to board. airlines are taking a wild and biased approach with the money as a factor/

You are denied boarding the flight because you are not a CECA. More airlines think CECA is preferred because of the evil nature of Lion who destroyed the world system. That is why CECA THINK THEY DESERVE THEIR SEATS MORE THAN OHER NATIONALS INCKLUDING SINKAPOREANS IN SINGAPORE FLIGHTS.
 
KNN we must resume the good old way of reserving seats like the good old days of cinema, where the seats taken are crossed with a marker pen.
 
Back
Top