Has anyone ever refused to surrender ICs to security?

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Jul 25, 2008
Messages
14,786
Points
113
Just wondering what if all of us start to enforce our rights to personal data protection: refuse to surrender ICs and ask the security guards to escort us to our destinations. Pretty soon the security guards will go peng san going up and down the building whole day long. Good idea?


Surrendering ICs at buildings: Set guidelines to protect data

Aug 7, 2014

VISITORS to buildings face the dilemma of being denied entry if they refuse to hand over their identity cards, or risking abuse of their personal data if they do ("Some security staff unsure of data act"; July 28).


The risk is greater when a visitor is required to fill in his IC number, mobile phone number and address in a log book in exchange for a pass.


There are no clear guidelines and visitors are presumed to have voluntarily provided the data.


I used to receive calls from telemarketers. When I asked how they got my mobile number, they told me it was collected from organisations that asked for visitors' ICs.


What security arrangements are in place to protect personal data and prevent unauthorised access to it?


As the Personal Data Protection Act does not prescribe a period for retaining personal data, organisations are at liberty to keep it for as long as they wish.


The Act should be amended so that the retention period is reasonable.


Organisations should not be given unlimited access to personal data, as IC numbers can be used to perform transactions.


Security staff should take appropriate measures to respect visitors' data and ensure that entries in a log book are concealed from other visitors.


If possible, organisations could ask staff to escort the visitors in, without the need to retain ICs.


Francis Cheng

 
Who ask you to give true identity, give your father IC, give IMH, LKY, undertaker Tel. No if they asked, why bother. if you can't handle security guard, PRC mei mei issues how can you handle your complex life, hate / love issues.

Just wondering what if all of us start to enforce our rights to personal data protection: refuse to surrender ICs and ask the security guards to escort us to our destinations. Pretty soon the security guards will go peng san going up and down the building whole day long. Good idea?


Surrendering ICs at buildings: Set guidelines to protect data

Aug 7, 2014

VISITORS to buildings face the dilemma of being denied entry if they refuse to hand over their identity cards, or risking abuse of their personal data if they do ("Some security staff unsure of data act"; July 28).


The risk is greater when a visitor is required to fill in his IC number, mobile phone number and address in a log book in exchange for a pass.


There are no clear guidelines and visitors are presumed to have voluntarily provided the data.


I used to receive calls from telemarketers. When I asked how they got my mobile number, they told me it was collected from organisations that asked for visitors' ICs.


What security arrangements are in place to protect personal data and prevent unauthorised access to it?


As the Personal Data Protection Act does not prescribe a period for retaining personal data, organisations are at liberty to keep it for as long as they wish.


The Act should be amended so that the retention period is reasonable.


Organisations should not be given unlimited access to personal data, as IC numbers can be used to perform transactions.


Security staff should take appropriate measures to respect visitors' data and ensure that entries in a log book are concealed from other visitors.


If possible, organisations could ask staff to escort the visitors in, without the need to retain ICs.


Francis Cheng

 
Just wondering what if all of us start to enforce our rights to personal data protection: refuse to surrender ICs and ask the security guards to escort us to our destinations. Pretty soon the security guards will go peng san going up and down the building whole day long. Good idea?

The first rule when you are not happy with rules is NEVER to tekan the "bottomest" employee enforcing them.

The government now wants to increase salaries for cleaners, nurses and security guards because Singaporeans have treated them shabbily. Their job became harder to do resulting in more turnover and less recruits. Ultimately, who pays for the costs of their pay rise? You. Your conservancy fees and hospital bills are just going to go up.

Not happy, just vote for any opposition and leave the staff alone. I don't know about you, but I am the last person who will want to increase my own cost of living.
 
Back
Top