Great. PAP and WP singing duet on remote gambling bill
http://wp.sg/2014/10/debate-on-remote-gambling-bill-mp-png-eng-huat/
http://wp.sg/2014/10/debate-on-remote-gambling-bill-mp-png-eng-huat/
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Great. PAP and WP singing duet on online gambling bill
- Thread starter Wanderer
- Start date
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2012
- Messages
- 2,783
- Points
- 0
The speech doesn't sound like a duet to me, as it contains disagreements in certain parts. You are entitled to your interpretation though, no matter how warped it can be, because I know warpness is a tendency with WP's critics.
WP position on gambling has been known especially after the casino debate in 2005 where WP was the most vocal opposition against it. It will support any bill against gambling and more.
The WP support the remote gambling bill proposed by the PAP, if that's not singing duet with the PAP in this bill, I don't know what is. U need to seriously brush up your comprehension skill. Or maybe get a highlighter.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2011
- Messages
- 1,163
- Points
- 0
The "disagreement" is wayang to let U know that they are "opposition". Most PAP MPs also have similar disagreement, why U don't support
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2012
- Messages
- 2,783
- Points
- 0
I would use Yellowarse's illustration in SDP's instance - you can't please everyone. Speak up and people say WP is wayang. Don't speak up and people say WP is silent.
- Joined
- May 26, 2009
- Messages
- 17,247
- Points
- 63
instead of just eliminating remote gambling, the pap should eliminate all gambling
如果你看不懂，我就用英文回應。這是我個人的語言偏好。
- Joined
- May 26, 2009
- Messages
- 17,247
- Points
- 63
hahahaha. thanks, I understand what you wrote but many here use english
Exactly. I mean, its like all vices. Such as alcoholic drink or cigarette. If use too much, it will harm. So some people can't handle vices, they will get addicted to cig to beer. Should we ban them all??
Sometime I just love using it... Okay I try to stick to using English most of the time here. I will try.
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2012
- Messages
- 2,783
- Points
- 0
Lesson: never use extreme example as for every extreme end there is another extreme end of the stick.
I am simply going to say that you allow prostitution, cigarettes and drugs all over the place, your place won't look pleasant even if you are not into vices. How about lifting the age on cigarette purchases and seeing two prostitutes at your doorstep?
What the hell u talking about? There are cig there are alcohol there are prostitutes in Singapore. They are not ban. Go drink some coffee clear your head before u speak.
This WP MP Png Eng Huat damn jialat... PAP wanna fine those who go online to gamble, he UP THE 'ANTE'!
"Bearing in mind that persons at-risk are exposed to the temptation of remote gambling 24-7, could the Ministry consider making counselling and therapy sessions compulsory in lieu of the penalties imposed especially if the person is a first time offender?"
PAP proposed to fine the first time offender, WP MP want the first time offender (ontop of the fine) TO GO COMPULSORY THERAPY SESSIONS! Mind you, FIRST TIME OFFENDER! Jesus!
Similar threads
