Govt bends laws in ways that defy common reasoning

[Confuseous]

I refer to the 7 Nov 2014 Straits Times report “Parliament: ‘When you have a small Bar and very small talent pool’”.

Contrary to what Minister Shanmugam said, if the constitution is changed to suit what the government finds it has to do, that’s not fitting the rules to the best it can but changing the rules to suit whatever purpose it may have.

Mr Chan Sek Keong isn’t the greatest jurist of his generation

Many Singaporeans may not agree with Minister Shanmugam that former chief justice Chan Sek Keong is the greatest jurist of his generation.

During the general election of 1997, Mr Goh Chok Tong and Mr Tony Tan entered Cheng San polling station in contradiction to general election rules but Mr Chen Sek Keong, as Attorney General then decided that no laws were broken.

But according to Parliamentary Elections Act (Chapter 218), contested elections:..............http://www.tremeritus.com/2014/12/02/govt-bends-laws-in-ways-that-defy-common-reasoning/

 

[mojito]

The reasoning is simple: enemies of the PAP - guilty, PAP and friends - never wrong.

 

[winnipegjets]

2017, charge Chan Sek Keong for crime against sinkees and breaching the constitution. He is a scum bag of the highest order.

 

[mojito]

2017, charge Chan Sek Keong for crime against sinkees and breaching the constitution. He is a scum bag of the highest order.

They are not within 200m of the polling station. They are inside the station itself! Ok what. So simple you dunno?