Got LAW but who respect who uphold? U dare violate, nobody dare stop and bring you to justice. SPF, SBS, SMRT workers dare confront them?

WangChuk

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Oct 19, 2024
Messages
4,660
Points
113
https://sg.news.yahoo.com/disruptive-bus-passengers-those-play-145727239.html

Straits Times

Disruptive bus passengers, like those who play loud music, to be penalised for causing nuisance​

Vanessa Paige Chelvan
Tue, 14 October 2025 at 10:57 pm SGT
4 min read

Generic photos of commuters at Choa Chu Kang bus interchange taken on Oct 12, 2025. Can be used for transport fare, cost of living, economy stories.

Those who breach regulations will face penalties in line with how their behaviour affects other bus passengers, with higher penalties for repeat offenders.
SINGAPORE – Disruptive and inconsiderate bus passengers, such as those who litter or cause a nuisance to others by playing loud music, are set to be penalised under new laws passed on Oct 14.

Senior Minister of State for Transport Murali Pillai said in Parliament that the Government intends to regulate the conduct of passengers to prevent inconsiderate behaviour on public buses and at bus interchanges. He cited examples such as eating and drinking, as well as playing loud music and videos on mobile phones.

Those who breach regulations will face penalties in line with how their behaviour affects other bus passengers, with higher penalties for repeat offenders, Mr Murali told the House.

The regulations will be made later and take reference from the Rapid Transit Systems Act, Mr Murali said during the debate on the Transport Sector (Miscellaneous Amendments) Bill.

In March, then Senior Parliamentary Secretary for Transport Baey Yam Keng had said in Parliament that the Government’s powers to manage commuter behaviour on board buses were more limited than for rail. The regulatory framework against inconsiderate behaviour will be aligned across buses and trains by 2026, he added.

The Bill passed on Oct 14 will also allow the authorities to conduct security checks on passengers on public buses and at bus interchanges.

Passengers who refuse to comply with checks, which could include frisk searches and putting their belongings through an X-ray machine, can be asked to leave the premises and fined up to $1,000.

These amendments to the Bus Services Industry Act are part of the Government’s efforts to make the public transport system more secure, said Mr Murali.

The powers to stop and search passengers at public transport nodes are already provided for in the Road Traffic Act and the Rapid Transit Systems Act.

With these changes, authorised officers such as Land Transport Authority (LTA) enforcement officers and public transport staff will be able to better protect members of the public at bus depots, interchanges and on public buses, said Mr Murali.

However, public transport workers should not be bogged down with passenger screening, said Ms Yeo Wan Ling (Punggol GRC), who is also executive secretary of the National Transport Workers’ Union.

“Their primary duty is – and must remain – to operate our public transport system,” she said, adding that security checks should be done by trained personnel. Where bus drivers are expected to support these efforts, procedures should be “clear, simple and practical”.

Ms Yeo noted that the Bill includes penalties against anyone who risks the safety of passengers on buses and at interchanges. She asked if this extends to the abuse of public transport workers.

Replying, Mr Murali said the Government intends to issue new regulations that will allow LTA enforcement officers to take stern action against passengers who abuse public transport workers. These will be announced later.

Ms Joan Pereira (Tanjong Pagar GRC) called for “special attention” to be placed on training officers to handle vulnerable commuters such as the elderly, and those with disabilities or with mental health challenges.

Mr Murali assured her that officers will be trained to carry out their duties professionally and with sensitivity towards more vulnerable groups.

Workers’ Party MP Dennis Tan (Hougang) asked how the LTA will ensure that security checks do not cause disproportionate delays to passengers. “How can we avoid creating unnecessary tension, given passenger loads during peak times?”

Mr Murali said each search takes less than a minute, and that passengers have been “generally understanding and cooperative”.

Security checks are “a necessary deterrence” as public transport nodes are attractive targets for terrorists, he added.

Mr Ang Wei Neng (West Coast-Jurong West GRC) said the Government should set aside a portion of the revenue it collects from certificate of entitlement (COE) premiums to improve the public transport system, such as by offsetting a portion of the annual fare increase, and to fund the renewal of bus and train assets.

In response, Mr Murali said the Government looks at the needs across different sectors to maximise the impact of its spending. The public transport sector is a key area for investment, and substantial operating subsidies of $2 billion are already provided every year, he added.

Other changes under the Bill include allowing the Public Transport Council to grant applications by bus operators to withdraw money they deposited into the Fuel Equalisation Fund, established in 1992 to help operators manage fuel price volatility.

This will allow bus operators to withdraw money that they had contributed to the fund over the years before contributions were suspended.
 
https://sg.news.yahoo.com/disruptive-bus-passengers-those-play-145727239.html

Straits Times

Disruptive bus passengers, like those who play loud music, to be penalised for causing nuisance​

Vanessa Paige Chelvan
Tue, 14 October 2025 at 10:57 pm SGT
4 min read

Generic photos of commuters at Choa Chu Kang bus interchange taken on Oct 12, 2025. Can be used for transport fare, cost of living, economy stories.

Those who breach regulations will face penalties in line with how their behaviour affects other bus passengers, with higher penalties for repeat offenders.
SINGAPORE – Disruptive and inconsiderate bus passengers, such as those who litter or cause a nuisance to others by playing loud music, are set to be penalised under new laws passed on Oct 14.

Senior Minister of State for Transport Murali Pillai said in Parliament that the Government intends to regulate the conduct of passengers to prevent inconsiderate behaviour on public buses and at bus interchanges. He cited examples such as eating and drinking, as well as playing loud music and videos on mobile phones.

Those who breach regulations will face penalties in line with how their behaviour affects other bus passengers, with higher penalties for repeat offenders, Mr Murali told the House.

The regulations will be made later and take reference from the Rapid Transit Systems Act, Mr Murali said during the debate on the Transport Sector (Miscellaneous Amendments) Bill.

In March, then Senior Parliamentary Secretary for Transport Baey Yam Keng had said in Parliament that the Government’s powers to manage commuter behaviour on board buses were more limited than for rail. The regulatory framework against inconsiderate behaviour will be aligned across buses and trains by 2026, he added.

The Bill passed on Oct 14 will also allow the authorities to conduct security checks on passengers on public buses and at bus interchanges.

Passengers who refuse to comply with checks, which could include frisk searches and putting their belongings through an X-ray machine, can be asked to leave the premises and fined up to $1,000.

These amendments to the Bus Services Industry Act are part of the Government’s efforts to make the public transport system more secure, said Mr Murali.

The powers to stop and search passengers at public transport nodes are already provided for in the Road Traffic Act and the Rapid Transit Systems Act.

With these changes, authorised officers such as Land Transport Authority (LTA) enforcement officers and public transport staff will be able to better protect members of the public at bus depots, interchanges and on public buses, said Mr Murali.

However, public transport workers should not be bogged down with passenger screening, said Ms Yeo Wan Ling (Punggol GRC), who is also executive secretary of the National Transport Workers’ Union.

“Their primary duty is – and must remain – to operate our public transport system,” she said, adding that security checks should be done by trained personnel. Where bus drivers are expected to support these efforts, procedures should be “clear, simple and practical”.

Ms Yeo noted that the Bill includes penalties against anyone who risks the safety of passengers on buses and at interchanges. She asked if this extends to the abuse of public transport workers.

Replying, Mr Murali said the Government intends to issue new regulations that will allow LTA enforcement officers to take stern action against passengers who abuse public transport workers. These will be announced later.

Ms Joan Pereira (Tanjong Pagar GRC) called for “special attention” to be placed on training officers to handle vulnerable commuters such as the elderly, and those with disabilities or with mental health challenges.

Mr Murali assured her that officers will be trained to carry out their duties professionally and with sensitivity towards more vulnerable groups.

Workers’ Party MP Dennis Tan (Hougang) asked how the LTA will ensure that security checks do not cause disproportionate delays to passengers. “How can we avoid creating unnecessary tension, given passenger loads during peak times?”

Mr Murali said each search takes less than a minute, and that passengers have been “generally understanding and cooperative”.

Security checks are “a necessary deterrence” as public transport nodes are attractive targets for terrorists, he added.

Mr Ang Wei Neng (West Coast-Jurong West GRC) said the Government should set aside a portion of the revenue it collects from certificate of entitlement (COE) premiums to improve the public transport system, such as by offsetting a portion of the annual fare increase, and to fund the renewal of bus and train assets.

In response, Mr Murali said the Government looks at the needs across different sectors to maximise the impact of its spending. The public transport sector is a key area for investment, and substantial operating subsidies of $2 billion are already provided every year, he added.

Other changes under the Bill include allowing the Public Transport Council to grant applications by bus operators to withdraw money they deposited into the Fuel Equalisation Fund, established in 1992 to help operators manage fuel price volatility.

This will allow bus operators to withdraw money that they had contributed to the fund over the years before contributions were suspended.
The older ones will have all kinds of excuses and say they have hearing issues and can’t hear properly whether the music is loud. If they play pah ceng buay song, they might be excused
 
In some countries, you will be shamed for taking a phonecall in public transport. :wink:

Warn first. If refuse, throw the person out at the next stop. This is when another person (a conductor or security guard) on board helps. :cool:
 
The law should reward anyone who confronts those boomers and kelengkia for either playing videos on the phone loudly or talking incessantly on the phone.

Every report is rewarded with $20 EZlink top up is enough. Like that @zhiwei can easily gross $200 EZlink top up per month.
 
just get security to stand at MRT interchange platform, many foreigners don't let people on the train to align first and rush to board.
 
The law should reward anyone who confronts those boomers and kelengkia for either playing videos on the phone loudly or talking incessantly on the phone.

Every report is rewarded with $20 EZlink top up is enough. Like that @zhiwei can easily gross $200 EZlink top up per month.
The offender tio orkong $1,000, from the $1,000 just give me $20 EZ-Link top up. SMRT sure earn one.
 
This can turn out to be a profitable revenue stream for SMRT.

But Muralee disclosed that $2 billion of operating subsidies are already provided every year. Question is, provided by who, and how are these substantial subsidies utilized? Or did it go straight into the pockets of those useless SMRT JLBs?
 
Now also need to control & train commuters while using & paying for their service? Sinkies are just one unique bunch that don't even know their rights as paying customers.

We really didn't have all these low SES behaviour till aliens flooding here. Now because of all these social ills, sinkies generally well behaved now also subject to end of the stick.
 
Liddat then must like FAA have bus marshall macam air marshall undercover to catch these people ?
 
Now also need to control & train commuters while using & paying for their service? Sinkies are just one unique bunch that don't even know their rights as paying customers.

We really didn't have all these low SES behaviour till aliens flooding here. Now because of all these social ills, sinkies generally well behaved now also subject to end of the stick.
Like these aliens. Floor is cleaner than bed
 

Attachments

  • 175AC309-494E-4B32-848E-29EF7B6EFAEA.png
    175AC309-494E-4B32-848E-29EF7B6EFAEA.png
    337.9 KB · Views: 1
  • E410161A-4194-40C8-B48C-5E05CBF92ED6.jpeg
    E410161A-4194-40C8-B48C-5E05CBF92ED6.jpeg
    17.3 KB · Views: 1
  • D0536DB0-06AB-4DAC-A720-F86102247FC7.jpeg
    D0536DB0-06AB-4DAC-A720-F86102247FC7.jpeg
    154.7 KB · Views: 1
Liddat then must like FAA have bus marshall macam air marshall undercover to catch these people ?
Why? Social distancing ambassadors that time not enough to catch people and keep unemployment low in Sg. Bus and MRT commuters need to be shepherd like primary school kids on a sch bus with bus Marshall to help
 
Back
Top