[h=1]PAP MP HRI KUMAR LIES TO AVOID KNOWLEDGABLE S'POREAN FROM ATTENDING HIS CPF DIALOGUE[/h]
<!-- /.block -->
<style>.node-article .field-name-ad-box-in-article {float: left;margin: 15px 15px 10px 0;}.node-article .field-tags{clear: both;}</style>
Post date:
11 Jun 2014 - 8:56am
<ins style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: currentColor; width: 336px; height: 280px; display: inline-table; visibility: visible; position: relative; background-color: transparent; border-image: none;"><ins id="aswift_1_anchor" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: currentColor; width: 336px; height: 280px; display: block; visibility: visible; position: relative; background-color: transparent; border-image: none;"><iframe name="aswift_1" width="336" height="280" id="aswift_1" frameBorder="0" marginWidth="0" marginHeight="0" scrolling="no" vspace="0" hspace="0" style="left: 0px; top: 0px; position: absolute;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe></ins></ins>
Background Story:
PAP MP Hri Kumar rejects Roy Ngerng and Kenneth Jeyaretnam from his CPF dialogue event
PAP MP Hri Kumar is holding a CPF dialogue event in his constituency titled "CPF - An Honest Conversation" on June 14. However, it seems that instead of an honest conversation, he wants it to be one-sided as he deliberately rejected Roy Ngerng and Kenneth Jeyaretnam from attending the event despite the deep knowledge and understanding that these two have on CPF.
Both Roy and Kenneth had registered for the event and Roy had forwarded the email he sent to Hri to TRS.
From: “Roy Ngerng”
Date: 9 Jun 2014 18:25
Subject: Regarding Interest in Attending CPF – An Honest Conversation: Public Dialogue with Thomson-Toa Payoh Residents
To: “Hri Kumar”
Dear Mr Hri Kumar,
I am writing in to you to confirm on my attendance for the public dialogue, CPF – An Honest Conversation: Public Dialogue with Thomson-Toa Payoh Residents.
I had registered for the event via the Facebook event page before the on-line registration was closed.
I would like to confirm on my registration. I understand that you had stated that this dialogue is open to all Singaporeans and look forward to being able to participate in this honest conversation.
Thank you for your attention in this matter. I look forward to attending the open dialogue.
Thank you.
However, despite the registration of Roy and Kenneth well before the close of online registrations, Hri Kumar obviously doesn't want them there and he replied to Roy giving the excuse that the event was only open to residents in his constituency:
From: “Hri Kumar” Date: 10 Jun 2014 08:55
Subject: Re: Regarding Interest in Attending CPF – An Honest Conversation: Public Dialogue with Thomson-Toa Payoh Residents
To: “Roy Ngerng”
Hi Roy,
I had organized the dialogue for my residents, as they are my constituents. The title of the invitation expressly states that. I do not recall saying that it is “open to all Singaporeans”. Can you let me know where I said that?
Could you let me know if you are a resident of Thomson – Toa Payoh or Bishan – Toa Payoh GRC?
Thanks.
Regards,
Hri
Despite Hri Kumar's denial that the event was 'open to all Singaporeans' it seems that he is lying to Roy or has conveniently decided to change the rule in order to avoid having to answer difficult questions at the dialogue.
Screenshots of Hri Kumar's replies to other Singaporeans proves that he intended the event to be open to others outside his constituency:
When these inconsistencies were pointed out to Hri Kumar, all he could do was come up with a lame excuse again:
From: “Hri Kumar” Date: 10 Jun 2014 12:20
Subject: Re: Regarding Interest in Attending CPF – An Honest Conversation: Public Dialogue with Thomson-Toa Payoh Residents
To: “
[email protected]”
That response was to that individual resident who asked.
I am currently not in Singapore with limited connection, hence the delay in response.
Regards
Why is Roy different when he also asked individually to attend the event just like Ghazali did.
Clearly, Hri Kumar is just trying to avoid having to answer difficult questions at the dialogue which he claims is an "honest" conversations
What do you think?
