Good Question: Is ComfortDelgro Abetting Trolley Theft by PRC?

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Jul 24, 2008
Messages
33,627
Points
0
[h=2]Trolley on bus incident: PRC woman engaging in theft![/h]
PostDateIcon.png
June 3rd, 2012 |
PostAuthorIcon.png
Author: Contributions

why_did_the_bus_driver_allow_passenger_to_bring_trolley-thumbnail-300x180.jpg
(Photo Stomp)

That trolley is the property of the supermarket meant only for the convenience of it’s customers to shop for their purchase within it’s premises. Pushing the trolley home without the consent of the supermarket amounts to theft of the trolley under the Penal Code. That bus driver was clearly abetting that theft committed and he should be sacked and the matter be reported to the police for criminal action to be taken against that lady and the bus driver.

Why is Comfort Delgro not doing it? The legal department of Comfort Delgro should know that not reporting a theft at law also render itself to be liable for prosecution for concealing a theft which they knew about it. This is the question Comfort Delgro must come clean with the people and the police for they are not above the law.

Our leadership is well known in always setting up the law to justify their doing and here lies a clear example why they are not doing it when there is clear evidence of theft in the clip and Comfort Delgro has not denied it. Double standard in applying the law for their own benefit.
.

Balancemind

* The comment first appeared on: ComfortDelGro replied on trolley on bus incident: PRC driver just being helpful
 
yes, why not take down the bus number and time, and photo so to get the PRC drivers fired? Then they can go back to china and find more money to bribe PAP dogs so they can come back again to singapore. Let Them Pay twice.
 
I recall, if I not mistakened, that the stomper(?) mentioned both the driver and shopper are PRC-accent.

I do not recall it being reported in the MSM who claimed to bring news to readers as it is.
 
Back
Top