• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Gillian Koh - How is surfacing the issue by Alex disrespectful to the Archbishop?

Confuseous

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
12,730
Points
113
What?! It's within Alex's right to surface the issue even if it was disrespectful?! Transparency may not be the key element in this tangle?! I can't believe what I had read from the senior researcher of a government think tank and the former editor of the mainstream media. But should I have expected anything else?

How is surfacing the issue being disrespectful to the Archbishop? Gillian came to this conclusion because she feels that the issue is about the interference of religion in politics. She is mistaken. It is not! The issue at hand is one of restorative justice.

- http://www.raviphilemon.net/2012/09/alex-au-is-irresponsible-and.html
 
Hope that it is clear enough that the FAP attack canines are ever ready to pounce on SGs when it is convenient to do so to keep them at bay. The FAP is but buying time for its FTrash pets to out-vote SGs through kelong-versation and what have you not.
 
What?! It's within Alex's right to surface the issue even if it was disrespectful?! Transparency may not be the key element in this tangle?! I can't believe what I had read from the senior researcher of a government think tank and the former editor of the mainstream media. But should I have expected anything else?

How is surfacing the issue being disrespectful to the Archbishop? Gillian came to this conclusion because she feels that the issue is about the interference of religion in politics. She is mistaken. It is not! The issue at hand is one of restorative justice.

- http://www.raviphilemon.net/2012/09/alex-au-is-irresponsible-and.html

Political research? She should change her title to something undelectable based on her constant fear of PAP.
 
We have given too much leeway to religious bigots in this day and age. The only respect we should give them is the same respect we give to mentally retards in mental institution who claims to be superman.
 
Back
Top