• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Funding cut becoz they critical of government and satirised political leaders

Char_Azn

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Aug 6, 2008
Messages
4,968
Points
48
THE National Arts Council (NAC) has cut the annual grant given to local theatre company Wild Rice even as it celebrates its 10th anniversary.

It will get $170,000 this year, down from $190,000 the year before. It is the smallest annual grant that the company has received from the council.

Artistic director Ivan Heng says the council told him funding was cut because its productions promoted alternative lifestyles, were critical of government policies and satirised political leaders.

In April last year, Wild Rice staged an all-male version of Oscar Wilde's The Importance Of Being Earnest, which had a sold-out two-week run at the Drama Centre. It was given an advisory of '16 years and above' by the Media Development Authority because of its all-male cast.

It also organises the OCBC Singapore Theatre Festival, a biennial festival showcasing local scripts, some of which take on political issues in a cheeky way.

Heng, 47, tells Life! he is disappointed with the council's decision. 'Shouldn't NAC be funding people's experience of theatre? What does support of the arts mean? What does moving into a more progressive society entail?'

http://www.straitstimes.com/BreakingNews/Lifestyle/Story/STIStory_523212.html

Anyone familiar with this group care to comment what issue exactly they were critical about or who they were making fun of?
 
Back
Top