- Joined
- Jul 15, 2008
- Messages
- 15,744
- Points
- 83
there chee soon juan goes again creating another controversy. right or wrong, u guys decide.
Bryan Ti
"Raffles City says it is private property, the Attorney-General's Chambers says it is PUBLIC PROPERTY. If Raffles City is right, the AGC has a lot of explaining to do." - Chee Soon Juan*
...true to his habitually deceitful self, CSJ is being disingenuous.
In 2006, he was charged for illegal assembly in a 'public place' and not 'public property'. Under the law, a 'public place' means:
(a) any place to which members of the public have access as of right or by virtue of express or implied permission, whether or not on payment of a fee, whether or not access to the place may be restricted at particular times or for particular purposes..., or,
(b) a part of a place that the occupier of the place allows members of the public to enter, but only while the place is ordinarily open to members of the public.
It matters not whether the property is privately owned or not. As usual, CSJ is out to deceive and attract attention.
Bryan Ti
"Raffles City says it is private property, the Attorney-General's Chambers says it is PUBLIC PROPERTY. If Raffles City is right, the AGC has a lot of explaining to do." - Chee Soon Juan*
...true to his habitually deceitful self, CSJ is being disingenuous.
In 2006, he was charged for illegal assembly in a 'public place' and not 'public property'. Under the law, a 'public place' means:
(a) any place to which members of the public have access as of right or by virtue of express or implied permission, whether or not on payment of a fee, whether or not access to the place may be restricted at particular times or for particular purposes..., or,
(b) a part of a place that the occupier of the place allows members of the public to enter, but only while the place is ordinarily open to members of the public.
It matters not whether the property is privately owned or not. As usual, CSJ is out to deceive and attract attention.
