• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Fool me once, shame on you, but fool CPIB over and over 4 years?

Confuseous

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
12,730
Points
113
CPIB head Eric Tan must be feeling pretty daff then. It’s a good thing that he accepts “responsibility for any lapses and deficiencies which allowed a senior staff’s actions to go undetected for four years”. But short of resigning, which would be harsh for at this stage, what does it mean exactly when the chief accepts responsibility? Two weeks ago, Police Commissioner Ng Joo Hee made no mention of responsibility and hardly anyone raised a ruckus. Responsible or not, the outcome on both cases will be similar: internal investigations, more checks in place, throw in a few government statements on the importance of integrity, the chief’s job stays safe for now, and let’s quickly move on and hope it doesn’t happen again. Fingers crossed, yo.

http://www.voiddecker.com/2013/07/m...ker+(The+Void+Decker)&utm_content=Yahoo!+Mail
 
Do it thenWKS way....

Sweep under the carpet, scak the small guys and declare a "lets move on".....


Useless irresponsible Bastard.....



CB564301-82C9-4B51-9FE4-F5ED1EB4BF9D.JPG
 
Back
Top